nicklucas
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
- Posts
- 512
Hello. I'm new to Lit, so if this topic has been covered (or covered and recovered to the point of shabbiness, like your maiden aunt's divan), then I apologize. The search turned up no threads with a similar title.
I thought about this while devising a profile signature. How we define or plot a range for "middle age" or "middle years" has changed, hasn't it?
Many years ago, my mother had a glum spell when she turned 35 and "middle aged." Does anyone consider 35 to be middle-aged anymore?
I certainly don't. Then again, I'm 53. My colleagues in their 40s seem young to me. Those in their 30s? Hardly adults. In their 20s? Babies!
As for the other direction, I can remember when turning 60 meant you were officially old.
Does your mileage vary?
Perhaps my view is distorted because of my own advancing years. But I talk to a lot of people, socially and professionally. I doubt the collective, generally accepted range of 35-59 still holds.
Our lengthening average life spans (until recently, anyway) probably have something to do with the way we think of the middle of our lives. If the actuarials suggest you'll live longer than your parents or grandparents, then of course your notion of the middle will shift upward.
Is there something else at work? I can think of a few possibilities: i.e., more people staying healthy and active far longer than previous generations; anti-ageism campaigns; maybe even sex-positivism (appropriate for a forum here).
What do you think? I'm curious to know.
I thought about this while devising a profile signature. How we define or plot a range for "middle age" or "middle years" has changed, hasn't it?
Many years ago, my mother had a glum spell when she turned 35 and "middle aged." Does anyone consider 35 to be middle-aged anymore?
I certainly don't. Then again, I'm 53. My colleagues in their 40s seem young to me. Those in their 30s? Hardly adults. In their 20s? Babies!
As for the other direction, I can remember when turning 60 meant you were officially old.
Does your mileage vary?
Perhaps my view is distorted because of my own advancing years. But I talk to a lot of people, socially and professionally. I doubt the collective, generally accepted range of 35-59 still holds.
Our lengthening average life spans (until recently, anyway) probably have something to do with the way we think of the middle of our lives. If the actuarials suggest you'll live longer than your parents or grandparents, then of course your notion of the middle will shift upward.
Is there something else at work? I can think of a few possibilities: i.e., more people staying healthy and active far longer than previous generations; anti-ageism campaigns; maybe even sex-positivism (appropriate for a forum here).
What do you think? I'm curious to know.