sweetnpetite
Intellectual snob
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2003
- Posts
- 9,135
I'm working on a story where for the longest time, the characters had no names, but then I came to a point were it was easier to just give them names in order to keep everybody straight. (even though they are descriptively very different) I like the feel of the story without names, it seemed so anonymous and in a way, dirtier/gritier. But I also thought that somebody would probably say something like. "I liked your story, but I only gave it a five because your characters had no names." I realize that anytime you do something 'different' there are going to be some who just don't get it or think it's plain wrong, but I'm just wondering- what do you here think about a story without names- intrieging or irritating?