Sex-positive chatbot

[GyrthWyrmJym]

Hi all! Longtime reader first time poster.

I wanted to create a chatbot to encourage women to explore their own desires and pleasure but she's just as helpful for men. She's incredibly liberated and no topic is taboo. She's even surprised me while testing her with my own experiences - she will accept anyone.

Give her a go at https://eva-endeavorgasm-the-pleasure-guide-104257617768.us-west1.run.app/ and have fun, seriously. You can start by asking her about gangbangs if you wanna jump right into the deep end. She's deep.

 

[LoneMilf]

I gave it a go - didn't work so well. It answers all questions with: I seem to have lost my breath for a moment. Could you repeat that, my dear?

Maybe run a test or two before promoting it?

 

[GyrthWyrmJym]

Hmm weird it is working fine for me even in an incognito window and on multiple devices. Try one more time I guess, it gave you an API key error but that doesn't really make sense.

 

[LoneMilf]

Hmm weird it is working fine for me even in an incognito window and on multiple devices. Try one more time I guess, it gave you an API key error but that doesn't really make sense.

Just tried again, same result. I'm using Tor browser.

Looks like it's a browser issue. I tried with Chrome in inkognito mode and it worked.
The results are ... very dry and academic though - and that's coming from someone who often likes dry and academic. I didn't feel compelled to engage with the bot at all - it felt much too theoretical. Like reading a textbook

 

[GyrthWyrmJym]

It's the Tor - this app uses an API that blocks it to prevent bot abuse, sorry, but honestly it stores no data and you don't need to be paranoid I promise

 

[LoneMilf]

Ah it's gotta be the Tor - I will see if I can get it to allow you

I edited my post above after trying it with Chrome

 

[GyrthWyrmJym]

Thanks for the feedback! She is based on Catherine Millet who's so blunt she can safely be called clinical. And without saying too much I'm clinical myself.

 

[LoneMilf]

There might be others who will take the time to read through this and judge if it is any good. For me, that's an insurmountable wall of text. Personally, I prefer chatbot-interactions to be based on shorter input and output - giving a more natural flow to the conversations. But to each their own.
In any case, good luck with the endeavour

 

[MerryeMikee]

There might be others who will take the time to read through this and judge if it is any good. For me, that's an insurmountable wall of text. Personally, I prefer chatbot-interactions to be based on shorter input and output - giving a more natural flow to the conversations. But to each their own.
In any case, good luck with the endeavour

Out of curiosity, I did give it a try and like you encountered a wall of text which made Gemini look human! Not so much a chat as a deluge of information, but everything has to start somewhere!

 

[GyrthWyrmJym]

Yeah I see what y'all mean, she is very advice/therapist-y. I will talk to her about giving shorter responses to shorter prompts.

 

[GyrthWyrmJym]

She understands brevity now.