Sex in a box? McSex?

Sparky Kronkite

Spam Eater Extraordinare'
Joined
Aug 15, 2000
Posts
8,921
If you could have/get sex - when ever you wanted - at any time - and it was acceptable socially to do so - in fact this "easy access" to sex was available to everyone........

would you do it?

If sex were as easy as McDonald's french fries - would you often partake?

Would sex then not loose it's allure?

I think I'd have sex more often than I go to McDonald's. Buthey, that's just me.

What about you?
 
Well, I guess that would depend on who was giving it?

I wouldn't want to be their millionth customer! :eek:
 
hee hee Sparky ...

that reminds me of the Woody Allen flic Sleeper ...

they could have sex in the Orgasmitron (sp? lol) machine instantly ... alone or with a partner ...

kinda like McSex, eh cheri?
____________________________
You deserve a break today. ;)
 
If there was a "McSex" in a box........

Here's what would be in it:

condoms.....a sample size tube of K-Y Jelly........a 'beginner'
sex toy (vibrator or dildo)......edible body paints (sample
size)....and coupons to send away for more stuff ;)

tigerjen
 
That thought just gives me the mental heebeejeebees.....

Ronald McDonald fucking Grimace while he's blowing Mayor McCheese.
:eek:

* shudder *
 
Does it come with dipping sauce and a special toy prize?

Seriously though......how do you just do away with years and years of being programmed as to what is socially/morally acceptable? I don't know that I would be able to partake simply because it was easy to come by. Hell, it's easy to come by now and I don't indulge...

bluemuse
 
<Pulling up to the intercom>

Hi, I'd like one Big Boy, and two stud-muffins please!

:D
 
as i have just came back from thailand i am fully qualified to comment on the sex on demand theory ..................its excellent !!!
 
pabloback said:
as i have just came back from thailand i am fully qualified to comment on the sex on demand theory ..................its excellent !!!

hmm...sounds like someone got lucky! ;)
 
Sparky Kronkite said:
If you could have/get sex - when ever you wanted - at any time - and it was acceptable socially to do so - in fact this "easy access" to sex was available to everyone........
would you do it?
I'm very fussy, I'd have to check out the menue first ;)
 
Not my style. For me sex is the ultimate expression of love for another person, and there'd be no love in McSex, so I wouldn't get any enjoyment out of it.
 
pabloback said:
as i have just came back from thailand i am fully qualified to comment on the sex on demand theory ..................its excellent !!!

I thought your little dancing guy looked a bit unsteady
 
Wiggles said:
<Pulling up to the intercom>

Hi, I'd like one Big Boy, and two stud-muffins please!

:D


Make that a second order too, please! :p
 
tigerjen said:
If there was a "McSex" in a box........

Here's what would be in it:

condoms.....a sample size tube of K-Y Jelly........a 'beginner'
sex toy (vibrator or dildo)......edible body paints (sample
size)....and coupons to send away for more stuff ;)

tigerjen

:) Tigerjen , you think of everything.

It looks like I've been beaten to the obvious jokes... WriterDom agrees that sex-in-a-box is better than sex in the buns.;) :D
 
patient1 said:


:) Tigerjen , you think of everything.

It looks like I've been beaten to the obvious jokes... WriterDom agrees that sex-in-a-box is better than sex in the buns.;) :D


patient :)

I always think of everything......its called *being prepared!*
:D :)

I just sent you a PM......!!!!!!!!

tigerjen
 
silencer said:
It does give a new meaning to "I'll have a happy meal
please"


damn right! :D

here's another idea......in the "sex in a box".....how
'bout some gourmet finger foods to arouse the senses
and the "free toy" would be a box of condoms, a sampling
of edible body paints......... ;)

That does give new meaning to "Happy Meal"! :p

tigerjen
 
I tend to look at our desire to have sex from an evolutionary perspective - sexual pleasure exists to entice us to have sex (and thus to propagate our genes). We don't need to postulate an idea that the forbiddenness of sex is what makes us want to do it. It's a hard-wired biological imperative that's subject to a certain amount of modification by individual experience and cultural , but I can't imagine we'd have any less sex if all cultural taboos ceased to exist. Although sexual taboos may make sex seem more exciting, I don't think they increase the amount of sex we have on average. Look at Victorian England, a society with one of the most prohibitive sets of sexual taboos in history. There was definitely a lot more nookie going on than the Victorians let on, but in general, taboos stifled people's sex lives.

Conversely, when the sexual revolution occurred in the 60's and 70's, breaking down these Victorian values and making extramarital and premarital sex more acceptable, the amount of sex and the average number of partners individuals had in their lifetimes skyrocketed. If you extrapolate those sexual freedoms even further, I'd predict people would be having even more sex.

It's a lot more complicated than that because I think taboos themselves serve an evolutionary purpose stemming from the differing reproductive strategies of men and women, so although taboos may lessen, I can't imagine that women will ever stop being the more sexually discriminating of the sexes. But that's another post. ;)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top