Seems to me the judicial branch now thinks it's also the administrative branch

HisArpy

Loose canon extraordinair
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Posts
41,722
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...r&cvid=f59dbe11a9a84017e814fb753c0834ef&ei=52

If the State wasn't in compliance, the judge could have shut down Rikers but to seize it, and turn control over to a flunky who reports directly to the judge, puts the judge in command. Which, under the Constitution, the court cannot do because it is not the administrative branch and has no authority to administer the laws of the land.

WT actual F is going on with the courts these days?
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...r&cvid=f59dbe11a9a84017e814fb753c0834ef&ei=52

If the State wasn't in compliance, the judge could have shut down Rikers but to seize it, and turn control over to a flunky who reports directly to the judge, puts the judge in command. Which, under the Constitution, the court cannot do because it is not the administrative branch and has no authority to administer the laws of the land.

WT actual F is going on with the courts these days?
Joe Biden and the communist left. Schumer admitted to placing 200 judges in the federal circuits to stop Trump, and I suppose for other nefarious reasons that might require undermining the Constitution.
 
Back
Top