HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 41,722
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...r&cvid=f59dbe11a9a84017e814fb753c0834ef&ei=52
If the State wasn't in compliance, the judge could have shut down Rikers but to seize it, and turn control over to a flunky who reports directly to the judge, puts the judge in command. Which, under the Constitution, the court cannot do because it is not the administrative branch and has no authority to administer the laws of the land.
WT actual F is going on with the courts these days?
If the State wasn't in compliance, the judge could have shut down Rikers but to seize it, and turn control over to a flunky who reports directly to the judge, puts the judge in command. Which, under the Constitution, the court cannot do because it is not the administrative branch and has no authority to administer the laws of the land.
WT actual F is going on with the courts these days?