I got these ground breaking revelations from a little know magazine where hard-core enthusiasts get detailed expert analysis and the latest technical information on military events relating to airforces and aircraft.
In an article of the November 2001 issue of Airforces Monthly magazine there is an article titles War in the Shadows which is written by one of those people who worked in the aforementioned darkness so is privy to the sort of information that the government denies us when they so feel like it. Before I reveal what secrets he had to divulge let me first point out the authors credentials.
This guy is "in the know", his name is Ronald Lewis. Ronald is an honor graduate of the US armed forces Air Intelligence Training Center and has spent over 6-years as an imagery interpreter and instructor. He served six years as a US aircraft weapons technician, later served in the Army National Guard as an award-winning Intelligence Analyst, and completed a tour with the Air force National Guard as an imagery interpreter and trainer.
Now for the stuff the media and government KEPT from the news covered-up or just neglected to report to us at the time.
And who are the Abu Sayyef guerrillas? Why they are the Islamic fundamentalists were have just recently sent 660 US Special Forces to the Philippines to battle with. Remember all that evidence about other people who rented the truck and helped the bombers but suddenly the government did a 180 on and denied their existence and involvement? Well now you know why, "its the economy stupid" and Billy boy Clinton did not want ANYTHING to distract us from the domestic good times and the illusion of peace and relative prosperity that we were enjoying. So we sat on our ass as a war was being waged against us so that we could enjoy an artificial clamminess and not have to do anything about it all.
There’s more..
There is allot more in this article, but you get the idea. These were all like strange puzzle pieces when they happened, but after reading this they all seem to fit together and make sense. I remember that missile strike when the Kurds were being attacked and the collective response from the media was "what the hell did they do that for". Now it all comes together, that is why those missiles were used in a high visibility target that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the Kurds being repressed in the North by The Republican Guard and why it had no effect on the forces arrayed against them and did such little actual damage in the end result.
This sucks! We've been being "shitted on" for a lack of better term by Iraq and Iran frequently in the last decade and have done nothing about it. Maybe they did not feel they had enough evidence to connect the dots to satisfy the anti-American socialists in the court of World opinion for a military strike. I say who gives a damn, maybe if we did something back during TWA flight 800 or Dhahran we would have never had a fucking WTC attack! I also shudder and wonder what would have happened IF ONLY ONE PLANE HAD HIT THE TOWER! If it had been a single plane would we even now sit in blissful ignorance of the danger we face while our government and the media comfortingly reassured us it had been a navigation accident? God, I’m so pissed, we had a right to know even if it was only hearsay, conjecture and circumstantial evidence-we still should have been informed so we could form our own opinion on what happened! Now I REALLY wonder about this "accidental" and "mysterious" West Nile virus that suddenly appeared out of the damn thin air in New York and has rapidly spread throughout the Eastern United States! Have we already been attacked with biological weapons long BEFORE the recent Anthrax letter campaign?
(I'm pasting this to several boards so forgive the EZcodes for quotes that will not work here).
In an article of the November 2001 issue of Airforces Monthly magazine there is an article titles War in the Shadows which is written by one of those people who worked in the aforementioned darkness so is privy to the sort of information that the government denies us when they so feel like it. Before I reveal what secrets he had to divulge let me first point out the authors credentials.
This guy is "in the know", his name is Ronald Lewis. Ronald is an honor graduate of the US armed forces Air Intelligence Training Center and has spent over 6-years as an imagery interpreter and instructor. He served six years as a US aircraft weapons technician, later served in the Army National Guard as an award-winning Intelligence Analyst, and completed a tour with the Air force National Guard as an imagery interpreter and trainer.
Now for the stuff the media and government KEPT from the news covered-up or just neglected to report to us at the time.
On April 19, 1995 the federal building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was destroyed by a massive truck bomb. Two former US Army soldiers, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, were convicted. McVeigh claimed that the bombing was meant as retaliation for the deaths of Branch Davidian cult members during a federal siege of their compound at Waco in 1994, but a later essay by McVeigh would not mention Waco even once. Instead he ranted about deaths of Iraqi children under UN sanctions, which had been a staple of Iraqi anti-sanctions propaganda for years. Terry Nichols had ties to Abu Sayyef in Manila. Initial suspicions of Iraqi involvement in the Oklahoma City (OKC) bombing were erroneously dismissed. 'Only' 168 were killed and their deaths were blamed on disgruntled ex-soldiers tied to US militia groups.
And who are the Abu Sayyef guerrillas? Why they are the Islamic fundamentalists were have just recently sent 660 US Special Forces to the Philippines to battle with. Remember all that evidence about other people who rented the truck and helped the bombers but suddenly the government did a 180 on and denied their existence and involvement? Well now you know why, "its the economy stupid" and Billy boy Clinton did not want ANYTHING to distract us from the domestic good times and the illusion of peace and relative prosperity that we were enjoying. So we sat on our ass as a war was being waged against us so that we could enjoy an artificial clamminess and not have to do anything about it all.
There’s more..
Six months later, the US House of Representatives passed a bill to tighten sanctions on Iran for its continued support of terrorism, particularly of Hezbollah in Lebanon. Despite warnings from Iran that it would consider such actions an 'act of war', the bill was passed on June 13, 1996. Two weeks later, bin Laden's forces teamed up with Hezbollah and drove a massive truck bomb to the US Air Force barracks compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, detonating in thereon the night of June 25, 1996. That attack 'only' killed 19 US airmen and wounded hundreds of other allied airmen. It would have been much more deadly had it not been for an alert USAF security policeman who sounded the alarm. The attack took place on the night of a new moon, when it would be darkest, enabling the attackers to escape detection for a few more precious seconds. A month later, on the day after the US Senate finished the legislation which would ultimately become known as the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act of 1996, a warning was faxed to London saying that the mujahideen would respond and amaze the world. That night, which also featured the increased darkness of a new moon, TWA 800 was destroyed. It was shot down, it was hit by a missile and the missile was launched by Usama bin Laden's forces. 'Only' 230 people were killed and the deaths were attributed to an accidental fuel tank explosion.
The only US response to the above acts was the June 1993 cruise missile attacks on the Iraqi Intelligence directorate's headquarters for its reported involvement in a plot to kill former president George Bush during a planned visit in Kuwait in April 1993. That attack involved 23 missiles which were fired at night to minimize casualties. A weak response, it only encouraged more attacks.
In September 1996, four USAF B-52s flew up the Persian Gulf as part of Operation DESERT STRIKE, a mission to fire AGM-86 air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs) at southern Iraq. This was officially described as punishment for Saddam Husseins attacks on Iraqi Kurds in the north-but there was a curious twist. Each M-52 was escorted by four Navy carrier-launched F-14 Tomcats which had originally been slated to drop bombs themselves. Instead, they were ordered to stand down their air-to-ground ordnance, replace it with a full load of air-to-air weaponry and fly as escorts for the B-52s. The B-52s would fire from stand-off ranges that kept them well away from any potential Iraqi threat and all of the other countries in the Gulf were considered friendly, with one exception-Iran. The ACLMs were of no value to the Kurds in the north and were essentially wasted, being fired at the wrong kind of targets for their particular warheads. Either the mission had been a colossal screw-up and a wasted effort, or Iraq was never intended as the real target The truth is that those missiles were a signal to Iran-the same B-52s turning left to fire on Iraq today can just as easily turn right and hit Iran tomorrow. Stop! Iran apparently got the message. There would b no further terror strikes against US interests until August 7,1998, when the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed.
There is allot more in this article, but you get the idea. These were all like strange puzzle pieces when they happened, but after reading this they all seem to fit together and make sense. I remember that missile strike when the Kurds were being attacked and the collective response from the media was "what the hell did they do that for". Now it all comes together, that is why those missiles were used in a high visibility target that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the Kurds being repressed in the North by The Republican Guard and why it had no effect on the forces arrayed against them and did such little actual damage in the end result.
This sucks! We've been being "shitted on" for a lack of better term by Iraq and Iran frequently in the last decade and have done nothing about it. Maybe they did not feel they had enough evidence to connect the dots to satisfy the anti-American socialists in the court of World opinion for a military strike. I say who gives a damn, maybe if we did something back during TWA flight 800 or Dhahran we would have never had a fucking WTC attack! I also shudder and wonder what would have happened IF ONLY ONE PLANE HAD HIT THE TOWER! If it had been a single plane would we even now sit in blissful ignorance of the danger we face while our government and the media comfortingly reassured us it had been a navigation accident? God, I’m so pissed, we had a right to know even if it was only hearsay, conjecture and circumstantial evidence-we still should have been informed so we could form our own opinion on what happened! Now I REALLY wonder about this "accidental" and "mysterious" West Nile virus that suddenly appeared out of the damn thin air in New York and has rapidly spread throughout the Eastern United States! Have we already been attacked with biological weapons long BEFORE the recent Anthrax letter campaign?
(I'm pasting this to several boards so forgive the EZcodes for quotes that will not work here).