Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?
If Wisconsin-ites are dumb enough to elect him (twice!), let them deal with him.
Because I shouldn't suffer for your bad economic choices.Wondering why you would say something like this? Truly, is it your opinion that the voters are so stupid that they deserve reduced debt and reduced unemployment as a result of their voting for Walker?
Perhaps you believe they'd be better served by higher unemployment and higher debt? Why would you believe so?
As it turns out, breaking the back of public unions is working everywhere it's being tried. Throwing off the shackles of publically employed parasites seems to work. Why should I, or anyone else in their right mind, pay for benefits that far exceed my own willingly with no measurable benefit to me or mine?
Schools are a failure, as is most other bureaucracies. For the most part they are an impediment to progress, unless you buy into the bull shit they profess for their own benefit. They exist for no other purpose than to expand their own sphere of influence. Not for you, me, or any progeny. For themselves and themselves alone.It is the nature of 'Empire Building.'
Why, for example, is it necessary for a budgetary expansion of government during an economic downturn?
Ishmael
well saidWondering why you would say something like this? Truly, is it your opinion that the voters are so stupid that they deserve reduced debt and reduced unemployment as a result of their voting for Walker?
Perhaps you believe they'd be better served by higher unemployment and higher debt? Why would you believe so?
As it turns out, breaking the back of public unions is working everywhere it's being tried. Throwing off the shackles of publically employed parasites seems to work. Why should I, or anyone else in their right mind, pay for benefits that far exceed my own willingly with no measurable benefit to me or mine?
Schools are a failure, as is most other bureaucracies. For the most part they are an impediment to progress, unless you buy into the bull shit they profess for their own benefit. They exist for no other purpose than to expand their own sphere of influence. Not for you, me, or any progeny. For themselves and themselves alone.It is the nature of 'Empire Building.'
Why, for example, is it necessary for a budgetary expansion of government during an economic downturn?
Ishmael
Anyway, I expect Romney's going to tap Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) for running-mate. Helps with the Latino vote (a bit; not that Mexicans really identify with Cubans). Walker is too much of a lightning-rod, he'd make every Dem in the country turn out on e-day.
Anyway, I expect Romney's going to tap Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) for running-mate. Helps with the Latino vote (a bit; not that Mexicans really identify with Cubans). Walker is too much of a lightning-rod, he'd make every Dem in the country turn out on e-day.
Do you think the Blunt-Rubio Amendment will make Marco a controversial choice too?
Note to liberals:
It's your people who think in racist terms like "Helps get the Latino vote." We only see Rubio as helping Romney get the Conservative vote.
Note to liberals:
It's your people who think in racist terms like "Helps get the Latino vote." We only see Rubio as helping Romney get the Conservative vote.
Being the primary political bulwark of the liberal-minority coalition, the Democrat Party must view all things through the prism of race and class.
He must be a right wing Tea Party cave man.
Oh wait, he's on the board of the NAACP.
Even blacks are being divided by the left's agenda. Thanks, Mr. Post-racial President.
http://qctimes.com/news/local/iowa-...cle_ce71937a-afec-11e1-96dc-0019bb2963f4.html
Yes really.
Note to liberals:
It's your people who think in racist terms like "Helps get the Latino vote." We only see Rubio as helping Romney get the Conservative vote.
I suggest you learn to read.
It shows an astounding, head in the sand, partisanship to suggest that only 1 party takes race and gender in to account when trying to win voters.
Wondering why you would say something like this? Truly, is it your opinion that the voters are so stupid that they deserve reduced debt and reduced unemployment as a result of their voting for Walker?
Perhaps you believe they'd be better served by higher unemployment and higher debt? Why would you believe so?
As it turns out, breaking the back of public unions is working everywhere it's being tried. Throwing off the shackles of publically employed parasites seems to work. Why should I, or anyone else in their right mind, pay for benefits that far exceed my own willingly with no measurable benefit to me or mine?
Schools are a failure, as is most other bureaucracies. For the most part they are an impediment to progress, unless you buy into the bull shit they profess for their own benefit. They exist for no other purpose than to expand their own sphere of influence. Not for you, me, or any progeny. For themselves and themselves alone.It is the nature of 'Empire Building.'
Why, for example, is it necessary for a budgetary expansion of government during an economic downturn?
Ishmael
Note to liberals:
It's your people who think in racist terms like "Helps get the Latino vote." We only see Rubio as helping Romney get the Conservative vote.
That, too, of course; but, if Romney makes that pick, it will be partly because he's thinking of the Latino vote as well. And you fucking know it. And there will be other electoral calculations to keep him from tapping Walker, and you know that too. The voters Romney really needs to win are centrist swing voters in swing states, not the Tea Partiers, who have nowhere else to go.
Get him out of Wisconsin.
Yeah, you're Mr. Content Of His Character. Don't try to bullshit us; we've been reading you for years.