Scat?

[pimpslap]

Re: , why did I have a healthy dog that LIVED to eat shit

hence why people dont get mad cow disease or Parvo but animals do.

Actualy humans do get BSE, in humans it's called Jakob - Keuzfeld syndrome... The spelling is fubar, but it sounds right...

 

[lovechild27]

J&K is something SIMILAR to what other animals get...it isnt the exact same thing. My point was...biologically, we are different from animals. Our bodies arent made to handle what theirs are..hence why they eat poo and dont get sick.

And j&K is WAY rare....much more common in animals than the human form in people.

NO WAY. Dom/sub roles are all about respect

Well that is reassuring.... it is something Id like to maybe try one day....

 

[catalina_francisco]

If this is truly the case, why did I have a healthy dog that LIVED to eat shit? He was pretty healthy and lived to ripe old doggie age (until I finally put him down from complications of a prostate tumor).

(BTW--I did not let that or any other dog lick me.)

From memory, dogs actually need to eat shit as a vital source of potassium if I have remembered it correctly, though the biology book I read this in stated the richest source for dogs was from cat shit, not dog.

C

 

[catalina_francisco]

Re: Re: , why did I have a healthy dog that LIVED to eat shit

NO WAY. Dom/sub roles are all about respect, in my experience. Whatever happens in the context of a relationship and behind closed doors is one thing, but always, the true dom/sub relationship has respect and support of each other at the very core.

I suppose if someone agreed to do it, that's one thing. But dom/sub is not about forcing someone to do something that they find completely repulsive.

S.

This is partly true, but submission is not submission when you agree to do something you enjoy or want. Submission is about fulfillinf the needs of the Dominant at the expense of your own wants and needs.

Catalina

 

[Guest]

Re: Re: , why did I have a healthy dog that LIVED to eat shit

NO WAY. Dom/sub roles are all about respect, in my experience. Whatever happens in the context of a relationship and behind closed doors is one thing, but always, the true dom/sub relationship has respect and support of each other at the very core.

I suppose if someone agreed to do it, that's one thing. But dom/sub is not about forcing someone to do something that they find completely repulsive.

S.

I think those that DO force their subs to do this as a show of loyalty are sadistic and mean. There as you know , are many others ways to do this. It's incredibly gross. To me as a Mistress , this sinks to the lowest depths.

 

[catalina_francisco]

And each is entitled to his or her opinion but as we both know also, most Masters would see it as a compliment to be considered sadistic and mean.

 

[lovechild27]

most Masters would see it as a compliment to be considered sadistic and mean.

Thats just twisted...why would anyone want to be a part of that? (not to sound like Im putting you down catalina...I really am curious)

The thought of submitting to another turns me on..but being forced to do revolting things...is...just....EWWWW...

 

[Quint]

Re: Re: Re: , why did I have a healthy dog that LIVED to eat shit

This is partly true, but submission is not submission when you agree to do something you enjoy or want. Submission is about fulfillinf the needs of the Dominant at the expense of your own wants and needs.

Catalina

I disagree with how this is phrased. I would emphasize more that the sub's desires are irrelevant, rather than directly countered by the dominant. Submission is submission; it may be more challenging when it is an act the submissive finds unpleasant, but it is no more valid than doing routine chores, pleasuring their dominant, or accepting pleasure themselves should their dominant desire it. It's about the obedience to their dominant's will, not that his will be to do something contrary to the submissive's desires.

At least, that's the way I see it.

 

[catalina_francisco]

Re: Re: Re: Re: , why did I have a healthy dog that LIVED to eat shit

I disagree with how this is phrased. I would emphasize more that the sub's desires are irrelevant, rather than directly countered by the dominant. Submission is submission; it may be more challenging when it is an act the submissive finds unpleasant, but it is no more valid than doing routine chores, pleasuring their dominant, or accepting pleasure themselves should their dominant desire it. It's about the obedience to their dominant's will, not that his will be to do something contrary to the submissive's desires.

At least, that's the way I see it.

Guess when I answered this at the end of a long day I neglected to make myself explicitly clear as I was referring to the post in question and the context of it's content in speaking about it being okay if a sub agreed to do something for their D. To me this could only result if a D requested something of their sub which to me is far different to a command. Unfortunately I thought this would be understood.

My Master for one does many things with my needs in mind, and as far respect and loving care, I can truthfully say I have never known a woman to be more loved and respected than I am by him. That being said I do not totally agree that to do something which is routine or pleasant for the sub is of equivelant value as to perform a task which is difficult, usually due to it being the complete opposite of who you are, or an unpleasant duty.

To perform one of these submissions is difficult, at times requiring many attempts before success even looms on the horizon as a possibility, thus to the D it demonstrates the sacrifice a submissive is willing to make in regard to herself to fulfil his needs. IMO it in no way compares to performing a task you enjoy and look forward to being asked to do. I am fortunate my Master appreciates me attempting to fulfil these difficult commands, even if I do not succeed, and proceeds to tell me how proud it makes him to know I will make those sacrifices and submit for him as a mark of my respect and devotion.

catalina