Saving Net Neutrality

[Que]

Nothing in that definition about freedom.

But that doesn't stop you from "feeling" the way you do.



and murder people for profit. Then they pay off regulators to get away with it.

That's oppression.




You think health care is state oppression and violence?

Uhh, ok.




Corporations will extort and oppress you. The thing is, you are blind to that, because you're a fundamentalist.


What's it called when a corporation does it?

Oh yeah "good business".





There is no such thing as "egalitarian enforcement". That you'd even say that term is more proof that you're still having trouble with basic concepts.

You're an absolute cartoon when it comes to these terms and understanding of them. If egalitarianism could happen without enforcement it would happen naturally and it would just be called "life is fair" or "everybody wins" and no one would whine for egalitarianism because it would just happen.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're an absolute cartoon when it comes to these terms and understanding of them. If egalitarianism could happen without enforcement it would happen naturally and it would just be called "life is fair" or "everybody wins" and no one would whine for egalitarianism because it would just happen.

He absolutely refuses to acknowledge that egalitarianism doesn't happen unless you go out and fuck some people up, punish the shit out of winners for winning and thus oppressing the losers.

Any time the state shows up to do violence in the name of egalitarianism and make thins more equal (rob the rich and give to the poor) he calls it "right wing" totalitarianism.

That's how he knows Vladimir Lenin is a RWCJ capitalist pig!!!

Then if you point out that he was in fact an ICONIC socialist who did it all in the name of egalitarianism.....he just leaves the thread and pretends the conversation never happened.

LOL he's that far out there....

 

[someoneyouknow]

As usual, the con artist hadn't a clue what he was talking about.

https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/apQ4ZL5_460s.jpg

 

[richard_daily]

He absolutely refuses to acknowledge that egalitarianism doesn't happen unless you go out and fuck some people up, punish the shit out of winners for winning and thus oppressing the losers.

That's not what egalitarianism is.

You're having trouble with basic concepts again.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That's not what egalitarianism is.

You're having trouble with basic concepts again.

See what I'm saying?

LOL




No, I'm not.

That's not egalitarianism but that's what's required to achieve it. That's why socialism (going out and fucking some people up in the name of egalitarianism) is considered left wing and why no matter what kind of lefty you claim to be it ALWAYS comes down to socialism at the core.

That's why you can't name a single attempt at egalitarianism that didn't involve some form of government authority to force it, not a single one. Hierarchy is the natural state of things.

 

[jaF0]

Senate bill to block net neutrality repeal now has 40 co-sponsors
The Hill - 1 hour ago
A Senate bill that would block the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from repealing its net neutrality rules now has 40 co-sponsors, Senate Democrats announced Tuesday.

 

[Rightguide]

Senate bill to block net neutrality repeal now has 40 co-sponsors
The Hill - 1 hour ago
A Senate bill that would block the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from repealing its net neutrality rules now has 40 co-sponsors, Senate Democrats announced Tuesday.

So? Probably all impotent Democrats.