Sadly it is those that cry for peace that cause the most death.

Aquila

Monkey God
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
6,687
Sadly enough, in certain instances, those who obstruct the use of force are the ones that allow situations to escalate beyond small contained actions.

Do you think that israel would have as many problems as it does now if it had been able to simply crush the PLO? it could have, and still could. but is held back by international cries of critisism.. How many more have to die, and how much more firmly entrenched and supplied do the terrorist have to be before israel is allowed to defend themselves as any other country on the planet is allowed to?.. until the PLO is so firmly entrenched that losses on both sides would be catostrophic?

and how many of you truly believe that Iraq is not the enemy of the U.s.? do you think they are not using you and your stalling peace cries for time to build and fortify more artillery positions? please.

Japan is a sterling example of this..
Had we not dropped the atom bomb, the war with japan would have continued for years more and cost the lives of many more than it did. and while the devestation of that bomb was horrific it DID int he long run SAVE LIVES.

Your cries for peace are noble, however the use of force is sometimes needed to maintain that peace. and NOW is the time it is needed.
 
Aquila said:
Your cries for peace are noble, however the use of force is sometimes needed to maintain that peace. and NOW is the time it is needed.

I agree, but to what point does force become too much?
 
Aquila said:

for time to build and fortify more artillery positions? please.


I was with you until this...their "entrenching" artillery will mean squat. We control the skies as it is now...once we totally take out their air defense and communication systems, just how much use do you think artillery will be? Entrenched artillery is a prime target for both precision and carpet bombing. Besides, their artillery against our armor will be an unfair fight.
 
Aquila said:
Force becomes too much once an enemy has surrendered.

Thank you and I understand what you are saying, but what about all the innocent people that get trapped in that force?
 
Hanns_Schmidt said:


The leftist, Amnesty loving pansy's have certainly taken over.

Not all leftists want peace. Many of us want to go to war for the right reasons if we do go. That's not a bad thing.

My wife is in the Army, and is on full alert right now. She could get called away at any minute. She knows what her Constitutional duty is, but she wants to know that she will be doing that duty for the right reasons, and not for the wrong ones.

Is that bad?
 
Bob_Bytchin said:
Not all leftists want peace. Many of us want to go to war for the right reasons if we do go. That's not a bad thing.

My wife is in the Army, and is on full alert right now. She could get called away at any minute. She knows what her Constitutional duty is, but she wants to know that she will be doing that duty for the right reasons, and not for the wrong ones.

Is that bad?

I personally don't think that is bad. Wouldn't you want to be doing it for the right reasons what ever they might be?
 
Just for Hanns...since he liked it so much the first time I posted this:

On April 24, 2002, Bill Bennett, Jack Kemp, and Jeane Kirkpatrick issued an open memorandum (attached below) about Israel and the Middle East. These 20 facts will help serve as a primer for those trying to understand the historical context of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The world's attention has been focused on the Middle East. We are confronted daily with scenes of carnage and destruction. Can we understand such violence? Yes, but only if we come to the situation with a solid grounding in the facts of the matter-facts that too often are forgotten, if ever they were learned. Below are twenty facts that we think are useful in understanding the current situation, how we arrived here, and how we might eventually arrive at a solution.

Roots of the Conflict

1- When the United Nations proposed the establishment of two states in the region--one Jewish, one Arab--the Jews accepted the proposal and declared their independence in 1948. The Jewish state constituted only 1/6 of one percent of what was known as "the Arab world." The Arab states, however, rejected the UN plan and since then have waged war against Israel repeatedly, both all-out wars and wars of terrorism and attrition. In 1948, five Arab armies invaded Israel in an effort to eradicate it. Jamal Husseini of the Arab Higher Committee spoke for many in vowing to soak "the soil of our beloved country with the last drop of our blood."

2- The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) was founded in 1964--three years before Israel controlled the West Bank and Gaza. The PLO's declared purpose was to eliminate the State of Israel by means of armed struggle. To this day, the Web site of Yasir Arafat's Palestinian Authority (PA) claims that the entirety of Israel is "occupied" territory.* It is impossible to square this with the PLO and PA assertions to Western audiences that the root of the conflict is Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

3- The West Bank and Gaza (controlled by Jordan and Egypt from 1948 to 1967) came under Israeli control during the Six Day War of 1967 that started when Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran and Arab armies amassed on Israel's borders to invade and liquidate the state. It is important to note that during their 19-year rule, neither Jordan nor Egypt had made any effort to establish a Palestinian state on those lands. Just before the Arab nations launched their war of aggression against the State of Israel in 1967, Syrian Defense Minister (later President) Hafez Assad stated, "Our forces are now entirely ready . . . to initiate the act of liberation itself, and to explode the Zionist presence in the Arab homeland . . . the time has come to enter into a battle of annihilation." On the brink of the 1967 war, Egyptian President Gamal Nassar declared, "Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel."

4- Because of their animus against Jews, many leaders of the Palestinian cause have long supported our enemies. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem allied himself with Adolf Hitler during WWII. Yasir Arafat, chairman of the PLO and president of the PA, has repeatedly targeted and killed Americans. In 1973, Arafat ordered the execution of Cleo Noel, the American ambassador to the Sudan. Arafat was very closely aligned with the Soviet Union and other enemies of the United States throughout the Cold War. In 1991, during the Gulf War, Arafat aligned himself with Saddam Hussein, whom he praised as "the defender of the Arab nation, of Muslims, and of free men everywhere."

5- Israel has, in fact, returned most of the land that it captured during the 1967 war and right after that war offered to return all of it in exchange for peace and normal relations; the offer was rejected. As a result of the 1978 Camp David accords--in which Egypt recognized the right of Israel to exist and normal relations were established between the two countries--Israel returned the Sinai desert, a territory three times the size of Israel and 91 percent of the territory Israel took control of in the 1967 war.

6- In 2000, as part of negotiations for a comprehensive and durable peace, Israel offered to turn over all but the smallest portion of the remaining territories to Yasir Arafat. But Israel was rebuffed when Arafat walked out of Camp David and launched the current intifada.

7- Yasir Arafat has never been less than clear about his goals-at least not in Arabic. On the very day that he signed the Oslo accords in 1993--in which he promised to renounce terrorism and recognize Israel--he addressed the Palestinian people on Jordanian television and declared that he had taken the first step "in the 1974 plan." This was a thinly-veiled reference to the "phased plan," according to which any territorial gain was acceptable as a means toward the ultimate goal of Israel's destruction.

8- The recently deceased Faisal al-Husseini, a leading Palestinian spokesman, made the same point in 2001 when he declared that the West Bank and Gaza represented only "22 percent of Palestine" and that the Oslo process was a "Trojan horse." He explained, "When we are asking all the Palestinian forces and factions to look at the Oslo Agreement and at other agreements as 'temporary' procedures, or phased goals, this means that we are ambushing the Israelis and cheating them." The goal, he continued, was "the liberation of Palestine from the river to the sea," i.e., the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea-all of Israel.

9- To this day, the Fatah wing of the PLO (the "moderate" wing that was founded and is controlled by Arafat himself) has as its official emblem the entire state of Israel covered by two rifles and a hand grenade--another fact that belies the claim that Arafat desires nothing more than the West Bank and Gaza.

10- While criticism of Israel is not necessarily the same as "anti-Semitism," it must be remembered that the Middle East press is, in fact, rife with anti-Semitism. More than fifteen years ago the eminent scholar Bernard Lewis could point out that "The demonization of Jews [in Arabic literature] goes further than it had ever done in Western literature, with the exception of Germany during the period of Nazi rule." Since then, and through all the years of the "peace process," things have become much worse. Depictions of Jews in Arab and Muslim media are akin to those of Nazi Germany, and medieval blood libels--including claims that Jews use Christian and Muslim blood in preparing their holiday foods--have become prominent and routine. One example is a sermon broadcast on PA television where Sheik Ahmad Halabaya stated, "They [the Jews] must be butchered and killed, as Allah the Almighty said: 'Fight them: Allah will torture them at your hands.' Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are, in any country. Fight them, wherever you are. Wherever you meet them, kill them."

11- Over three-quarters of Palestinians approve of suicide bombings-an appalling statistic but, in light of the above facts, an unsurprising one.

The State of Israel

12- There are 21 Arab countries in the Middle East and only one Jewish state: Israel, which is also the only democracy in the region.

13- Israel is the only country in the region that permits citizens of all faiths to worship freely and openly. Twenty percent of Israeli citizens are not Jewish.

14- While Jews are not permitted to live in many Arab countries, Arabs are granted full citizenship and have the right to vote in Israel. Arabs are also free to become members of the Israeli parliament (the Knesset). In fact, several Arabs have been democratically elected to the Knesset and have been serving there for years. Arabs living in Israel have more rights and are freer than most Arabs living in Arab countries.

15- Israel is smaller than the state of New Hampshire and is surrounded by nations hostile to her existence. Some peace proposals--including the recent Saudi proposal--demand withdrawal from the entire West Bank, which would leave Israel 9 miles wide at its most vulnerable point.

16- The oft-cited UN Resolution 242 (passed in the wake of the 1967 war) does not, in fact, require a complete withdrawal from the West Bank. As legal scholar Eugene Rostow put it, "Resolution 242, which as undersecretary of state for political affairs between 1966 and 1969 I helped produce, calls on the parties to make peace and allows Israel to administer the territories it occupied in 1967 until 'a just and lasting peace in the Middle East' is achieved. When such a peace is made, Israel is required to withdraw its armed forces 'from territories' it occupied during the Six-Day War--not from 'the' territories nor from 'all' the territories, but from some of the territories."

17- Israel has, of course, conceded that the Palestinians have legitimate claims to the disputed territories and is willing to engage in negotiations on the matter. As noted above, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered almost all of the territories to Arafat at Camp David in 2000.

18- Despite claims that the Israeli settlements in the West Bank are the obstacle to peace, Jews lived there for centuries before being massacred or driven out by invading Arab armies in 1948-49. And contrary to common misperceptions, Israeli settlements--which constitute less than two percent of the territories--almost never displace Palestinians.

19- The area of the West Bank includes some of the most important sites in Jewish history, among them Hebron, Bethlehem, and Jericho. East Jerusalem, often cited as an "Arab city" or "occupied territory," is the site of Judaism's holiest monument. While under Arab rule (1948-67), this area was entirely closed to Jews. Since Israel took control, it has been open to people of all faiths.

20- Finally, let us consider the demand that certain territories in the Muslim world must be off-limits to Jews. This demand is of a piece with Hitler's proclamation that German land had to be "Judenrein" (empty of Jews). Arabs can live freely throughout Israel, and as full citizens. Why should Jews be forbidden to live or to own land in an area like the West Bank simply because the majority of people is Arab?

In sum, a fair and balanced portrayal of the Middle East will reveal that one nation stands far above the others in its commitment to human rights and democracy as well as in its commitment to peace and mutual security. That nation is Israel.
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Sadly it is those that cry for peace that cause the most death.

Bob_Bytchin said:
I was with you until this...their "entrenching" artillery will mean squat. We control the skies as it is now...once we totally take out their air defense and communication systems, just how much use do you think artillery will be? Entrenched artillery is a prime target for both precision and carpet bombing. Besides, their artillery against our armor will be an unfair fight.

My point is that is Iraq is preparing for war... not co-existance and peaceful trade with the rest of the world.

Originally posted by littlekateyes
Thank you and I understand what you are saying, but what about all the innocent people that get trapped in that force?
They are caught up in it now.. nothing will stop them being political statements to be made by terrorist. other than putting a stop to it once and for all.
How would you feel if every day you went to go to buy a loaf of bread you looked over your shoulder for someone with a gun? or a bomb? Their lives are already at risk... sadly War is their hope now.
 
Re: Re: Re: Sadly it is those that cry for peace that cause the most death.

Aquila said:
How would you feel if every day you went to go to buy a loaf of bread you looked over your shoulder for someone with a gun? or a bomb? Their lives are already at risk... sadly War is their hope now.

I don't know what it is like, nor would I want to. Who does? That is what I am talking about, what about them just to get a loaf of bread they have to put their lives at risk. Sadly you are right that is war.
 
lavender said:
Bob Bytchin, those facts ignore some very pertinent information regarding land purchases and holding by the Israelis prior to the 1948 date.

Please add these facts.
 
Who are the innocent people today? If the choice is made by the person or the country guilt is assumed or assigned. We lost many lives on 9/11. We lost many as nukes were dropped on Japan.

Innocent people many times cannot change the situation. I need food. I go to the market. I meet the bomb. Unfortunate but unavoidable.
 
SaintPeter said:


Innocent people many times cannot change the situation. I need food. I go to the market. I meet the bomb. Unfortunate but unavoidable.

Everyone meets death. Whether it's from a car wreck, getting hit by a meteorite, or getting shot at the supermarket. Life is just a crap-shoot it seems.
 
Bob_Bytchin said:
Everyone meets death. Whether it's from a car wreck, getting hit by a meteorite, or getting shot at the supermarket. Life is just a crap-shoot it seems.

We have soldiers specificly to protect our citizens from becoming targets. Being shot sucks, its painful, its incapacitates you even if you live through it, and its not something joe sixpack or jane public should worry about on a daily basis.
 
Aquila said:
We have soldiers specificly to protect our citizens from becoming targets. Being shot sucks, its painful, its incapacitates you even if you live through it, and its not something joe sixpack or jane public should worry about on a daily basis.

Soldiers aren't policemen. They aren't here to protect anyone from being shot. That's what cops are for, but even they aren't here to "prevent" anything. When the military is on the streets to protect you, then we have martial law. Is that what you want?

My point was that death comes to us all at the worst times, and it was directed at St Peter. But it's still just a crap-shoot.
 
Back
Top