Russia Investigation was not legally predicated

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
68,391
The evil intent of Deep State Democrats is finally on full public display. These were domestic enemies deciding they didn't approve of our choice for President and decided to commit an act of aggression against the Constitution and the people of the United States. They openly tried to sabotage the duly elected President and his administration. They don't deserve to be tried by a civilian court, they should be tried by military tribunal:


FBI opened Russia probe on third-hand 'suggestion' of collusion, declassified memo shows

Former FBI executive says memo shows probe should never have been opened up "in a million years."

Kevin Brock, the former chief of intelligence for the FBI, said the electronic communication did not meet the bureau's rigorous standards for predicating the opening of a criminal or counterintelligence case.

"There is nothing in the EC that meets the traditional thresholds for opening up a FARA or CI investigation," Brock told Just the News. "It appears hastily constructed."

The memo also contains evidence of other red flags, Brock explained, including that Strzok both drafted and approved the opening of his own investigation and originally segregated the memo so it could only be seen by "case participants" and not other FBI officials.

Asked whether as an FBI assistant director he would have approved opening Crossfire Hurricane based on what was in the memo, Brock said: "Not in a millions years. I wouldn’t have approved it as a squad supervisor either. This would have set off alarm bells in any FBI field for not meeting our standards for a predicate."

Rest here:

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...lassified-doc-reveals-fbi-apparently-launched
 
Back
Top