Ruined Orgasms (on purpose)

[The_Good_Sub]

It's this fetish of mine to have my mistress tease and/or deny me for a few days and of course have me service her however she wants. Then when she says I get to cum right before I do she stops and it just sputters, dribbles and dies off in a most unsatisfying way. Pretty much is the worst thing she could do to me, but for some reason I secretly want her to do it to me and at the same time fear it more than anything else.

It doesn't happen very often but I always love/hate it when she does.

Anyone else here ever use this on their partner? I know there are a ton of ways of doing it like the most common of stopping just before and then there is thumbing and there are other methods.

It's pretty hard to find much about it though. Doesn't seem as common as most other bdsm subjects.

 

[Last_Rider]

I've got some experience, but only during personal play, and I'm totally with you on the love/hate relationship.
It's not satisfying at all, but infinitely better than nothing; at least most of the time.
If you're interested in movies and such, I believe the unquestioned Mistress of denial is Taylor St. Claire.
Again, my personal experience is usually me trying to prolong a session and pushing just a bit too far, but I've ruined intentionally before, usually so I can try for another orgasm soon after.
Hopefully that's helpful, if not I apologize for taking up the space.

 

[MALIBUMAN666]

If you look further down the page you will find a thread called 'I found this the other day' or something.

You will like it very much.

 

[The_Good_Sub]

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=667990

That clip is pretty good, except that guy dresses like a woman, That never made sense to me. Why would a mistress want a male slave that dresses like a woman? I guess my point of view on the subject is the slave is like a sex crazed animal that must be kept in captivity not a pantywaist who can't satisfy her.

 

[MisterSir]

That clip is pretty good, except that guy dresses like a woman, That never made sense to me. Why would a mistress want a male slave that dresses like a woman? I guess my point of view on the subject is the slave is like a sex crazed animal that must be kept in captivity not a pantywaist who can't satisfy her.

Of course it won't make sense to you, it's not your fetish. You think anybody I meet in my vanilla life would understand I get my jollies from what is pretty much torture?

 

[Last_Rider]

Of course it won't make sense to you, it's not your fetish. You think anybody I meet in my vanilla life would understand I get my jollies from what is pretty much torture?

Here's hoping they don't, but I'm not sure how good an actor you are.

As for fetish, I don't try to understand everyone's, so to all us freaks, good on ya.

 

[The_Good_Sub]

Here's hoping they don't, but I'm not sure how good an actor you are.

As for fetish, I don't try to understand everyone's, so to all us freaks, good on ya.

I didn't mean for that to sound judgmental. Just putting in my 2 cents. I agree to each his/her/its own

 

[MALIBUMAN666]

No, feminization is not my bag either..

 

[uteasemeipleaseu]

I find that if a lady brings me close enough to orgasm to bring me to the point of spurting, and then stops, even without stimulation, I will still spurt, very very strongly, particularly if there has been a long period of teasing. I can bring myself to the point (rarely), where I stream slightly thin fluid with very little sensation, and even more rarely has a lady done this, but essentially, even if the hand is removed, once the point of no return is reached, there will be serious spurting.