DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 26,580
RIP Lindsey Graham
- Thread starter BabyBoomer50s
- Start date
Only a POS with a dark, DISEASED HEART would say / post such a rotten thing about a young idealistic human being…
It all tracks…
We. Told. Them. So.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 73,204
Reading someone you hate every day isn't a habit; it is a full-time, unpaid internship. You are single-handedly funding his engagement metrics while claiming to hate him.
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 77,828
He's a troll. Twitter shows me his stuff. I don't engage with his stuff outside of that.
YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 15,726
Details please, and be specific.
Mind you, that would be poetic justice given that McConnell stole a Supreme Court seat. But all Beshear has done to date is ask for proof that McConnell is still alive. How is that "scheming to steal the seat"?
Nope. It's well over ten times safer:
Childbirth: 8.8 deaths per 100,000 women
Abortion: 0.6 deaths per 100,000
If you really believed that, you would support more affordable health care for families, paid childcare, more investment in public education, etc...but we all know where you come down on all of those.
Over 4,500 messages and phone calls from people who knew Kavanaugh is "no evidence"? Two other women besides Dr. Ford making similar accusation is "no evidence"?
No, wait, I've got it. You mean the FBI "failed" to find evidence. Nice try, but what really happened is that they were under orders from the White House not to conduct a full independent probe. The man is a misogynistic pig and your side got away with putting him on the Court. Live with it.
YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 15,726
That you know of.
And neither did Biden.
DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 26,580
Baked mayonnaise“Baked mayonnaise” aka “Lindsey Graham in hell”…
We. Told. Them. So.
SkyBubble
Virgin
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2006
- Posts
- 3,367
Just plain wrong, as I have shown. And absolutely not safe for the baby.
And the friend who was supposed to validate Blasey Ford's story couldn't and said it likely never happened. And they weren't in the same place when things are supposed to have happened. And his friends also testified that it didn't happen. Sorry, but your cult had no evidence except your own imaginations.
YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 15,726
As is nearly always the case when you claim to have "shown" something, you've really just said it as if that makes it so. It doesn't.
See my comments above. You don't really care about babies, you just want to punish women for having sex.
Not true. That's based entirely on a heavily biased account that was designed to fool people like you.
People like that do not try to rape a girl only once. That's not how it works.
If they were his friends, odds are they were guilty of similar transgressions, or at least were aware of what he had done and didn't want the shame of admitting they knew and did nothing.
Physician, heal thyself.
SkyBubble
Virgin
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2006
- Posts
- 3,367
Wrong.
https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-check-abortion-is-14-times-safer-than-childbirth/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6027002/
https://blog.equalrightsinstitute.com/is-abortion-14-times-safer-than-childbirth/
https://www.liveaction.org/news/msnbc-guest-claims-abortion-safer-birth
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26710380/
https://shop.prolifegen.org/product/abortion-safer-than-childbirth-info-card/
Not that you actually care. And that's not the issue anyway. The issue is the human life you're destroying. Not htat you give a crap about that either.
I’ll see your nonsense reports on the matter and raise you the findings of JAMA:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2844131
YOU. LOSE.
SUCK IT.
We. Told. Them. So.
YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 15,726
Oh, this is a fun one.
1. "R&G used Guttmacher-derived legal abortion numbers for their denominator rather than CDC numbers (even though they used CDC numbers for abortion-related deaths), allowing the larger numbers in the denominator to dilute the numerator." Both irrelevant and misleading. A larger number of abortions would logically include a larger number of abortion-related deaths, albeit not by much when the death rate is extremely low.
2. "The CDC relies primarily upon death certificate documentation or deaths that happen to come to its attention in order to detect abortion-related deaths, but there are many reasons that these deaths may not be documented." First of all, note the wishy-washy language ("may not be documented"). But more importantly...
- Their reasoning here includes, "a prior abortion is often not known by the certifier." So what? If she's having another abortion, that means the previous one didn't kill her or render her infertile like a back-alley abortion or being forced to give birth in some circumstances would have. In no way does one abortion make a subsequent one riskier, though I'm sure you've got some propaganda that says otherwise.
- "Abortion complication reporting is not required by federal law and ideologically driven individuals may misrepresent, hide, or fail to report abortion-related deaths." That would be extremely unethical, and if there were any track record of that happening, you can bet the anti-choice movement would be shouting it from the rooftops. All you've got here is hypotheticals.
- "Deaths from mental health causes (suicide, homicide, accidents due to high risk-taking behavior, substance and alcohol abuse and overdose) are rarely documented as abortion-related on death certificates" - That's because they are not abortion-related in any way. What little evidence does exist that shows women can get depressed and turn to substance abuse after an abortion points squarely to people like you who make them feel guilty about it in the first place.
- "The total number of pregnancies in the U.S. is unknown because early pregnancy losses are not recorded." True but irrelevant. An early pregnancy loss is neither an abortion nor a birth.
I could go on, but I think that drives the point home well enough.
These are essentially retreads of your first link, and just as inaccurate.
This one is simply based on your last link.
This goes only to the title page of the paper, it doesn't even have a link to the actual paper, and I don't believe for one moment that you actually read it. (Neither did I, but I'm not citing it, am I?)
This is literally just a postcard with a headline.
I don't believe you really buy that. As I said above, if you did, you'd care about what happens to all those babies after they're born. But you don't.
Last edited:
TheNurseWithPrettyLegs
Plain ol' me
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2025
- Posts
- 164
How about mental health assessments for people who own cars?
How about mental health assessments for people who eat with sharp forks and knives?
How about mental health assessments for people who throw rocks or sticks?
How about mental health assessments for people who use drugs and drink too much?
How about mental health assessments for people who have (insert color here) eyes?
How about mental health assessments for people who have (insert color here) hair?
How about mental health assessments for people who are short?
How about mental health assessments for people who are tall?
How about mental health assessments for people who are fat?
How about mental health assessments for people who are thin?
How about mental health assessments for people who breathe oxygen and walk upright on two legs?
How about mental health assessments for people who are just like me and might possibly be as crazy as a shit house rat but who's parents taught them not to shoot, stab, cut, throw rocks at, or run over with trucks because it's wrong?
How about that???????
People who are short or tall or eat with cutlery are not so likely to murder children as people with guns. Why does the idea rile you? Do you want the insane to own guns?
RobDownSouth
Trump Is Dying
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 80,510
That's quite a bit of unserious deflection.
SkyBubble
Virgin
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2006
- Posts
- 3,367
Once again, you clearly didn't read the articles or consider the information. The findings are from respectble medical professionals. You are a closed-minded idiot.
I’ll see your nonsense reports on the matter
JAMA (the source I provided) is the final word on the matter; full stop.
Hope that ^ helps.
We. Told. Them. So.
SkyBubble
Virgin
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2006
- Posts
- 3,367
Sorry, but it is not. The data I supplied does not support this false claim.
In my professional opinion, SkyBoBo suffers from a serious mental disease and/or defect (MAGAtitus)
JAMA concurs…
SkyBoBo We. Told. Them. So.
