Right Wing Blow Hard, Candace Ownes, Needs a Body Bag

[schism666]

the cretin just self owned in the funniest possible way.

https://i.imgur.com/rj51COC.jpg?2

https://i.imgur.com/UpFfNko.jpg?1

 

[DeluxAuto]

Maybe Reichguide will finally spell her name right.

 

[Lazaran]

.
She ain't the first Deplorable to be outed as a hypocritical fraud. Not that the deplorable fools who pay attention to her would notice.

I actually thinks Candace Owens is just like the traitor in chief. She's running a con on the Deplorable base, and is using her somewhat unique status as a "conservative" woman of color to profit as a political pundit

More power to her. She won't be getting any of my money or attention via her media marketing. That's what the low education Deplorables are for. They can buy and eat as much of her bullshit as they want.

*nods*

 

[CornusKousa]

Self owned??

Hypocrite??

How do you figure??

Oh that's right you ignore the argument that there is a right to life and become a super specific liberal so you can "own the deplorables".....and look like dumb fuckers in the process.

Biology deniers too!!

 

[RobDownSouth]

Candace Owens on vaccinations: "My body, my choice!"
Candace Owens on abortion: "My body, my conservative legislator's choice!"

No inconsistency there, nope. Nuh uh.

 

[Ramone45]

Self owned??

Hypocrite??

How do you figure??

Oh that's right you ignore the argument that there is a right to life and become a super specific liberal so you can "own the deplorables".....and look like dumb fuckers in the process.

Biology deniers too!!

I don't like to use disparaging words, but the abhorrent leftists are simply intellectually dishonest. But, I understand Ms. Owens must be extremely frightening to them because she checks all the boxes they hate. A bright, independent truthful colored woman.

 

[CornusKousa]

Candace Owens on vaccinations: "My body, my choice!"
Candace Owens on abortion: "My body, my conservative legislator's choice!"

No inconsistency there, nope. Nuh uh.

It's only inconsistent if you ignore biology and the other human life involved in pregnancy.

 

[CornusKousa]

I don't like to use disparaging words, but the abhorrent leftists are simply intellectually dishonest. But, I understand Ms. Owens must be extremely frightening to them because she checks all the boxes they hate. A bright, independent truthful colored woman.

Overtly so.

She takes away their race/genital card, effectively disarming the left of their two biggest weapons and forcing them to argue the issue....which they hate.

 

[WillJ8787]

the cretin just self owned in the funniest possible way.

https://i.imgur.com/rj51COC.jpg?2

https://i.imgur.com/UpFfNko.jpg?1

Correct...it is hypocritical to be for medical rights as an individual right and freedom And then hold others to a medical standard that does not afford those same rights.

Typical low character republican BS...freedom for me but not for thee.

 

[CornusKousa]

Correct...it is hypocritical to be for medical rights as an individual right and freedom And then hold others to a medical standard that does not afford those same rights.

Typical low character republican BS...freedom for me but not for thee.

We got another biology denier going full on false equivalency.

Shocking

 

[RobDownSouth]

It's only inconsistent if you ignore biology and the other human life involved in pregnancy.

You want to go there, Stanford? Fine.

Perhaps you'd like to take my Amicus Memorial Abortion Challenge? It's been scaring off anti-choice apologists for over 9 years now!

The "Amicus Memorial Abortion Challenge".​

There are actually six separate arguments that comprise the "Is Abortion Moral" debate:

1. Is it alive?
2. Is it human?
3. Is it a person?
4. Is it physically independent?
5. Does it have human rights?
6. Is abortion murder?

Let's see if we can find some common ground here.

1. Is it alive? My answer is yes.

2. Is it human? Again, I'll answer yes.

3. Is it a person? No, it's a "potential person", which is both separate and distinct from a "person", inasmuch as an acorn is distinct from an oak tree.

4. Is it physically independent? Absolutely not. A fetus is dependent upon another human being for nutrients and oxygen. It's worth noting that many of the anti-abortion folks raise the false equivalency that because a newborn infant is also dependent upon another for nutrients and oxygen, a fetus should be considered the functional equivalent of a newborn. This shows an inability to distinguish between the concepts of "physical independence" and "social independence". Social independence is where a child depends on society to feed, clothe and nuture him/her. Physical independence, on the other hand, is when something depends on the physical body of another for its continued existence. This seems to be a point you seem unable or unwilling to grasp.

5. Does it have human rights? A qualified yes. A human fetus has rights to the extent that the do not infringe upon the rights of another, in this case the woman carrying the fetus. You cannot have two entities with equal rights occupying one body, because one will automatically have veto power over the other, and by definition this precludes "equal rights".

6. Is abortion murder? No. It's only murder when it's an independent person. Infants, even premature infants, are considered "independent" of their mother and are accorded full human rights.

There are six separate questions above. Let's see how many you avoid.

 

[CornusKousa]

You want to go there, Stanford? Fine.


There are six separate questions above. Let's see how many you avoid.

Rob deflects with bullshit.

Your opinions on abortion are irrelevant to Owens alleged hypocrisy.

Her opinion is different, that doesn't make it hypocritical.

If you acknowledge her perspective, there is NOTHING hypocritical about her position.

Owens is only a hypocrite in this scenario when you and the other comrades disregard her point of view and insert your own as her baseline point of view.

That's not hypocrisy by Owens, that's intellectual dishonesty and being a piece of shit on yours. You and the comra(D)es are a fine example of both these things on a regular basis Rob, and today is no different.

 

[srgreene]

the cretin just self owned in the funniest possible way.

https://i.imgur.com/rj51COC.jpg?2

https://i.imgur.com/UpFfNko.jpg?1

I think it's the wrong decision, but it's not a 100% slam dunk case, Moreover, she has that right to refuse. You choose to inanely smear her, but you don't deal with the main issue she raised, the right to make your own decisions. People have been harmed by these vaccines, and particularly if she & hub are young and healthy, the odds of getting seriously ill from covid are small.

Now children .... I'm not so sure in general. But for a vaccine that has only experimental accreditation- err on the side of caution, for sure. Healthy children are at very low risk.

Your post is just another in a long chain of banal character assassinations that proliferate on this site. Candace is a treasure.

 

[srgreene]

Correct...it is hypocritical to be for medical rights as an individual right and freedom And then hold others to a medical standard that does not afford those same rights.

Typical low character republican BS...freedom for me but not for thee.

Those who cherish their freedom will protect their right to refuse medical treatment that is alleged to be in their best interest. Ever hear of the Cutter incident?

But of course, a statist like yourself has no regard for individual liberty.

 

[coati]

When a lot of people campaign against abortions, it does not cause fetuses to mutate and transfer pregnancies aerially to other men and women.

When a lot of people campaign against COVID vaccinations, COVID does mutate and eventually transfers new forms of infections aerially to other men and women.

Deplorables: Campaign against abortions all you want. That won't directly cause me to get pregnant. But if you want to promote turning general society into petri dish for respiratory viruses, please move to Mississippi and learn to speak with a southern drawl.

"Mah rhatt to live. Yer rhatt to live and die in Mississippi."

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I think it's the wrong decision, but it's not a 100% slam dunk case, Moreover, she has that right to refuse. You choose to inanely smear her, but you don't deal with the main issue she raised, the right to make your own decisions. People have been harmed by these vaccines, and particularly if she & hub are young and healthy, the odds of getting seriously ill from covid are small.

Now children .... I'm not so sure in general. But for a vaccine that has only experimental accreditation- err on the side of caution, for sure. Healthy children are at very low risk.

Your post is just another in a long chain of banal character assassinations that proliferate on this site. Candace is a treasure.

So you too are in the pro choice camp.....while I tend to disagree with most of your other views and opinions, at least we have agreement that each person gets to be the decider on what happens with their own body.

 

[jaF0]

SC Governor said exactly the same thing in slightly different words.

 

[phrodeau]

https://mobile.twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1233075049214685186

Candace Owens
·
Feb 27, 2020
now we’re all going to die from Coronavirus.

 

[Rotadom]

I don't like to use disparaging words, but the abhorrent leftists are simply intellectually dishonest. But, I understand Ms. Owens must be extremely frightening to them because she checks all the boxes they hate. A bright, independent truthful colored woman.

Oh no. People like you still exist.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1233075049214685186

Candace Owens
·
Feb 27, 2020
now we’re all going to die from Coronavirus.

She's been dead inside for years.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Rob deflects with bullshit.
Your opinions on abortion are irrelevant to Owens alleged hypocrisy.
Her opinion is different, that doesn't make it hypocritical.
If you acknowledge her perspective, there is NOTHING hypocritical about her position.
Owens is only a hypocrite in this scenario when you and the other comrades disregard her point of view and insert your own as her baseline point of view.
That's not hypocrisy by Owens, that's intellectual dishonesty and being a piece of shit on yours. You and the comra(D)es are a fine example of both these things on a regular basis Rob, and today is no different.

Oh look.

Tucking tail and running away, declarin' victory the whole time.
Just like your days in the sandbox, amiright?

Coward.
Chickenshit coward.

Run away little boy.

 

[RoryN]

This one is hurting Deplorables - deeply.

Sometimes hypocrisy stares them in the face, and they don't flinch. This time, it did that and then broke their noses.

 

[RobDownSouth]

This one is hurting Deplorables - deeply.

Sometimes hypocrisy stares them in the face, and they don't flinch. This time, it did that and then broke their noses.

They have put on something of a master class in rationalizing hypocrisy.

 

[Rotadom]

This one is hurting Deplorables - deeply.

Sometimes hypocrisy stares them in the face, and they don't flinch. This time, it did that and then broke their noses.

They have put on something of a master class in rationalizing hypocrisy.

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/72276565/the-level-of-hypocrisy-is-too-damn-high.jpg

 

[phrodeau]

Oh look.

Tucking tail and running away, declarin' victory the whole time.
Just like your days in the sandbox, amiright?

Coward.
Chickenshit coward.

Run away little boy.

He must have taken Stanford’s course on solipsism.

 

[RobDownSouth]

He must have taken Stanford’s course on solipsism.

As a highly trained "combat infantryman", he has learned to tuck tail and run like hell in the face of superior firepower.

That training kept him alive in the sandbox (sadly, at the expense of his fire team members who followed orders and stood their ground).

It also explains why his own platoon fired an RPG at his cowardly ass the last time he tried that stunt. Jokes on them, though, he gets "disability" now (for "headaches").