JMohegan
.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 8,226
Thanks for the translation.That article is the Red Cross saying that Tokyo is safe, and that the vessels of reactor 1,2,3,and 4 are not broken.
More interesting is the below Flesh News that basically got totally ignored:
http://www.corriere.it/notizie-ulti...dioattiva-Roma/16-03-2011/1-A_000187264.shtml
ESperti, Tokyo meno radioattiva di Roma
16 Marzo 2011 13:14 ESTERI
(ANSA) - TOYOHASHI - Roma e' sei volte piu' radioattiva di Tokyo. E' la sorpresa delle analisi effettuate dalla squadra della Protezione civile italiana nella capitale nipponica, resi noti dalla nostra ambasciata. I rilievi danno una radioattivita' di fondo sul tetto dell'ambasciata di 0.04 microsievert/ora. Il valore ambientale tipico della citta' di Roma e' di 0.25 microsievert/ora. Non ci sono isotopi che possono essere stati prodotti in un reattore nucleare e questo esclude al momento rischi a Tokyo.
Basically that Rome is normally 6 times more radioactive than Tokyo is right now, and that no isotopes from the plant were detected.
Yeah, Italy too has its own agenda, of course, with the political parties "fighting" over the nuclear power "yes vs no" debate.
But considering that this numbers make their decision to withheld the help look coward, they are probably true. And the fact that nobody else turned them into a big article? Probably makes them even more true. (I cannot see any political gain for them by stating that Rome is more radioactive, and I'm pretty good at finding "suspicious reasons" if I start digging)


