Reply ONLY with a question

Status
Not open for further replies.
If we agree to disagree on that topic, then, will you allow me another query?

Do you suppose conversation is more enjoyable with some tension and confrontation to it, or less?
 
LowMurmur said:
Aren't you generalizing about people? Must all be herd animals?

Doesn't all of philosophy--as well as other navel-gazing abstractionism--generalize beyond the bounds of reason?

And why use "must"; doesn't that just bringing it around to free will again?
 
Philosophically, as Rousseau would say, "what that f**k", but, everything exists doesn't it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top