Reliable & Valid Feedback

[sr71plt]

So what? Evasion on this question only pins the obvious answer down.

 

[lovecraft68]

Well, that was typical nonsense. Nobody wrote it; it doesn't exist. How stupid can you be about this?

See, he doesn't have one under any name. He's just lying and wishing he did have one--and, for him, wishing enough can make it happen (in his mind).

Pathetic.

Pathetic? That's funny coming from you.

Let's see a scanned copy of a program from a major Broadway musical with your name on it.

Let's see the name a of a film that if I buy it your name will be in the credits.

Let's see a link to some of your "modeling"

Let's see the official document supporting your claim to have helped write the current US copyright laws, do you have one of those?

Let's see your name on the official list of those who flew the Blackbird!

Wait, I've seen that list! Your name doesn't show under the complete list of Blackbird Pilot's written by an expert(and former crew member) That was endorsed by that cool little Blackbird club itself.

I think your answer to that was "I was top secret" and none of the other 200 people were? And it would matter 30+ years later?

As for top secret no former spy would send all day on a chat room giving every single detail of his life. Wait, I forgot sometimes you say you were a spy in undercover dangerous missions, other times you wrote press clips, which one is it?

And to harp on someone saying they have a green E on a free writing site?

Now that is pathetic.

 

[sheablue]

One of my favorite pieces of literary advice, passed down from writer to writer, probably originating in the early 1900's. Here is Stephen King's version:

“Kill your darlings, kill your darlings, even when it breaks your egocentric little scribbler’s heart, kill your darlings.”

 

[AMoveableBeast]

One of my favorite pieces of literary advice, passed down from writer to writer, probably originating in the early 1900's. Here is Stephen King's version:

“Kill your darlings, kill your darlings, even when it breaks your egocentric little scribbler’s heart, kill your darlings.”

Love this quote, always have.

 

[lovecraft68]

One of my favorite pieces of literary advice, passed down from writer to writer, probably originating in the early 1900's. Here is Stephen King's version:

“Kill your darlings, kill your darlings, even when it breaks your egocentric little scribbler’s heart, kill your darlings.”

Is that the Martin Game of Thrones approach?

 

[Swilly]

Pathetic? That's funny coming from you.

Let's see a scanned copy of a program from a major Broadway musical with your name on it.

Let's see the name a of a film that if I buy it your name will be in the credits.

Let's see a link to some of your "modeling"

Let's see the official document supporting your claim to have helped write the current US copyright laws, do you have one of those?

Let's see your name on the official list of those who flew the Blackbird!

Wait, I've seen that list! Your name doesn't show under the complete list of Blackbird Pilot's written by an expert(and former crew member) That was endorsed by that cool little Blackbird club itself.

I think your answer to that was "I was top secret" and none of the other 200 people were? And it would matter 30+ years later?

As for top secret no former spy would send all day on a chat room giving every single detail of his life. Wait, I forgot sometimes you say you were a spy in undercover dangerous missions, other times you wrote press clips, which one is it?

And to harp on someone saying they have a green E on a free writing site?

Now that is pathetic.

He doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, it's Dos Equis. He is...the most interesting man in the world.

 

[sr71plt]

I don't drink beer at all, and, as always, LC (who is the most pathetic one here--his nose is brown from following me around and sticking it up my butt) both exaggerates anything I've ever claimed and shows a life too small to even understand this stuff, and, beyond that, is totally irrelevant to the point of JBJ's claim of a Green E (now isn't he?). Of course LC doesn't claim to have any Green Es--because he doesn't have any--and the reason for that is obvious--it's the only statistic he can't cheat.

 

[lovecraft68]

I don't drink beer at all, and, as always, LC (who is the most pathetic one here--his nose is brown from following me around and sticking it up my butt) both exaggerates anything I've ever claimed and shows a life too small to even understand this stuff, and, beyond that, is totally irrelevant to the point of JBJ's claim of a Green E (now isn't he?). Of course LC doesn't claim to have any Green Es--because he doesn't have any--and the reason for that is obvious--it's the only statistic he can't cheat.

Poor Pilot, clinging to his E's. They are precious to you aren't they?

I don't blame you; its the only proof you have that at least one person read your story

 

[lovecraft68]

He doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, it's Dos Equis. He is...the most interesting man in the world.

That would be one hell of a sad world.

 

[sr71plt]

Oh, I'm not going to read those posts, LC. I'm sure they have nothing to do with JBJ claiming have a Green E.

 

[EndOfStory]

Oh, I'm not going to read those posts, LC. I'm sure they have nothing to do with JBJ claiming have a Green E.

So, what you are saying is that they fit in with yours in that regard too?

One of my favorite pieces of literary advice, passed down from writer to writer, probably originating in the early 1900's. Here is Stephen King's version:

“Kill your darlings, kill your darlings, even when it breaks your egocentric little scribbler’s heart, kill your darlings.”

Big supporter of this one when editing. If nothing else, it will (most of the time) lead to some interesting debate between the author and myself

 

[lovecraft68]

Oh, I'm not going to read those posts, LC. I'm sure they have nothing to do with JBJ claiming have a Green E.

Translation: I have no answer for your last remark and will pretend I did not read it.

 

[sr71plt]

So, what you are saying is that they fit in with yours in that regard too?

Beats me. The man is rabid. He follows me everywhere and shoves his nose up my ass. Has turned this forum into knots with his stalking. It's a 75 percent lock that when he follows my posts, the little chipmunk is chewing on me.

On this thread, he brought in crap that he's just half exaggerating and the rest making up, and it has nothing to do with what I was posting about (and didn't initiate) on JBJ's stupid and needy Green E claim.

LC is just a jealous, sick small-life pseudo-man who has stalked me on this forum for years. This is as big as his world gets, a place to escape to from a screwed up family, a jailing for juvenile macho-man violence, the wish to fuck and torture his sister, a failed marriage, and a failed business--all of which he has moaned about on this forum.

 

[EndOfStory]

Beats me. The man is rabid. He follows me everywhere and shoves his nose up my ass. Has turned this forum into knots with his stalking. It's a 75 percent lock that when he follows my posts, the little chipmunk is chewing on me.

On this thread, he brought in crap that he's just half exaggerating and the rest making up, and it has nothing to do with what I was posting about (and didn't initiate) on JBJ's stupid and needy Green E claim.

LC is just a jealous, sick small-life pseudo-man who has stalked me on this forum for years. This is as big as his world gets, a place to escape to from a screwed up family, a jailing for juvenile macho-man violence, the wish to fuck and torture his sister, a failed marriage, and a failed business--all of which he has moaned about on this forum.

I'm quite curious why you think there is any need to bring up another persons mental state when having a debate (that isnt about said persons mental state).

Normally I would lean towards calling that childish behaviour, but surely, you are not acting like a child ...

and just to rewind the clock a bit here, you started the whole "wah wah wah, my ego can't handle that someone else claims something" derail of this thread.

 

[sr71plt]

You can either remain curious or you can read in on the forum. Your choice.

And you're doing selective reading on this thread--enough so that perhaps you are an LC plant. I didn't call JBJ on his Green E claim this time--another poster did--and LC came back with a rabid and irrelevant attack on me--with crap he's posted for years and which I gave up correcting him on years ago.

You can either read the thread or continue to play the LC shill. I don't care which.

And then you can buzz off.

 

[EndOfStory]

You can either remain curious or you can read in on the forum. Your choice.

And you're doing selective reading on this thread--enough so that perhaps you are an LC plant. I didn't call JBJ on his Green E claim this time--another poster did--and LC came back with a rabid and irrelevant attack on me--with crap he's posted for years and which I gave up correcting him on years ago.

You can either read the thread or continue to play the LC shill. I don't care which.

And then you can buzz off.

No, he made it up. Shows how needy he is, doesn't it?

I think this post stands for itself.


Being curious has the "interesting" side-effect of being open to different views and also at the same time, not caring an awfull lot about what people "claim" is the truth.

I merely go by what is posted in this thread.

If you have a beef with another person on this forum, then that is your personal judgement/opinion/problem/whatever-you-want-to-label-it-as.

Personally I just find it fairly hilarious that you phrase it as you do.

hmm, so now im a possible lovecraft plant and/or shill. I must say, you dont take debate very well do you?

Caring, interesting choice of word for this situation, especially when you consider that the easiest way to show you dont "care" is to avoid responding. Of course that leaves the impression that your previous stance was wrong. We cant have that! (This sentence might contain sarcasm)

Buzzing off is hard to do when you aint a bee. The one being "busy" with other peoples work isn't me.

 

[sr71plt]

And I think that with only nine posts under your belt, you presume a whole lot of forum knowledge you don't have. Which brings up the point of why should I care what you think if you won't bother to inform yourself before you jump in. As I noted, I wasn't the one who called JBJ on his frequent lie about having a Green E (which is an insult to all of us who do have them). If you'd bothered to look JBJ's list up rather than sticking your nose into the thread, you would have seen for yourself that he has no Green E--so the shortfall there is yours. And LC jumped on me irrelevantly. I didn't jump on him. If you can't figure that out on your own, you're either an LC shill or dumb as a rock. In either case, I don't really care what you think. Go stick your uninformed nose into some other discussion thread.

You asked a question and I answered it. If you didn't like the answer, that's your problem. Who appointed you the hall monitor here?

 

[lovecraft68]

I'm quite curious why you think there is any need to bring up another persons mental state when having a debate (that isnt about said persons mental state).

Normally I would lean towards calling that childish behaviour, but surely, you are not acting like a child ...

and just to rewind the clock a bit here, you started the whole "wah wah wah, my ego can't handle that someone else claims something" derail of this thread.

Just take a look at his signature to know who is "rabid" about who. In every post he is egging something on.

That tells you all you need to know.

But don't take my word for it. Stick around the boards and just read and post. If people don't kiss his feet he will turn every thread into a fight.

All you have to do is watch.

 

[lovecraft68]

I think I would be remiss if I didn't point out who went to bed and who was still talking about who at 1:19 in the morning.

Like the line in Pet Detective

Obsess much? Much too much

 

[EndOfStory]

All right then, from the top once more.

And I think that with only nine posts under your belt,

What does number of forum posts have to do with anything?

you presume a whole lot of forum knowledge you don't have

Now you are just being way too cute.

Which brings up the point of why should I care what you think if you won't bother to inform yourself before you jump in.

No one is telling you to care. That is 100% a choice you make at any given point in time. Please do quote where I claim otherwise?

As I noted, I wasn't the one who called JBJ on his frequent lie about having a Green E (which is an insult to all of us who do have them)

You had the "dubious" honor of being the first actually. Because this:

Where's your Green E story? I'm looking at your Submissions page but I don't see it. Did you sell it and take it down?

Is a question, and a question isn't calling someone on something?

Also, does it really matter if someone claims to have a green E or not?, surely you are not walking around in shoes "that" tight?

If you'd bothered to look JBJ's list up rather than sticking your nose into the thread, you would have seen for yourself that he has no Green E--so the shortfall there is yours.

As I mentioned earlier, I just go by what is written in this thread. And based on that. Your logic is "lacking"

The whole "he said, she said, It humped" thing is not of any interest to me at all. There are words on a page that are "fact" why not go by them instead of rumours and assumptions?

And LC jumped on me irrelevantly. I didn't jump on him.

From my pov, it seems that lovecraft threw a bunch of "claims" at you, basically the same you did in post #20 http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=56589450&postcount=20 , 7 posts or so earlier.

Mind, both of you are equally "silly".

The inconsistency in logic was just the biggest in your posts, hence I replied the first time

If you can't figure that out on your own, you're either an LC shill or dumb as a rock.

:/ I truly hope that this isnt the "height" of your debating skill, name calling and personal attacks. I'm disappointed.

In either case, I don't really care what you think.

For someone who doesn't care, you sure go out of your way nicely to respond.

Go stick your uninformed nose into some other discussion thread.

Why? I like it here.

You asked a question and I answered it. If you didn't like the answer, that's your problem.

Actually, what you have done so far is the "equal" to sticking your head in the ground and going "la la la la".

On your "half" of the table, you have fabricated a time frame that isnt true (see your claim as to who "attcked" first), made personal attacks, presumed "interesting" things about other people (without any evidence).

As for "liking the answer", I'm still waiting for a logically "sound" answer.

Who appointed you the hall monitor here?

Why?, do you need an appointment?

 

[JKendallDane]

You asked a question and I answered it. If you didn't like the answer, that's your problem. Who appointed you the hall monitor here?

Did you type that out with a straight face?

Are there any mirrors in that glass house you live in?

You...of all people on this forum...are the last person that should be trying to hang a "hall monitor" sign around anyone else's neck!

 

[DonnaBeck]

This thread is getting too damn serious and way off track. I am not going to put it back on track at all, but I certainly won't be intentionally mean, just irreverent.

1. I exchanged a few pm with Lovecraft that were so genuine and polite, I had no idea if he were a he or a she. (Had an ambiguous avatar)

2. I read Lovecraft and thought he was a nice heterosexual man who writes well.

3. I read more Lovecraft and realized he is a deranged pervert who writes well. (And I mean that in the nicest way possible.)

4. Lovecraft's new avatar scares me, but he doesn't.

 

[patientlee]

I'm afraid of it too. Call me a racist, but I'm terrified of black dogs. Also poodles and fox terriers.

This thread is getting too damn serious and way off track. I am not going to put it back on track at all, but I certainly won't be intentionally mean, just irreverent.

1. I exchanged a few pm with Lovecraft that were so genuine and polite, I had no idea if he were a he or a she. (Had an ambiguous avatar)

2. I read Lovecraft and thought he was a nice heterosexual man who writes well.

3. I read more Lovecraft and realized he is a deranged pervert who writes well. (And I mean that in the nicest way possible.)

4. Lovecraft's new avatar scares me, but he doesn't.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

All right then, from the top once more.


What does number of forum posts have to do with anything?



Now you are just being way too cute.



No one is telling you to care. That is 100% a choice you make at any given point in time. Please do quote where I claim otherwise?



You had the "dubious" honor of being the first actually. Because this:



Is a question, and a question isn't calling someone on something?

Also, does it really matter if someone claims to have a green E or not?, surely you are not walking around in shoes "that" tight?




As I mentioned earlier, I just go by what is written in this thread. And based on that. Your logic is "lacking"

The whole "he said, she said, It humped" thing is not of any interest to me at all. There are words on a page that are "fact" why not go by them instead of rumours and assumptions?



From my pov, it seems that lovecraft threw a bunch of "claims" at you, basically the same you did in post #20 http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=56589450&postcount=20 , 7 posts or so earlier.

Mind, both of you are equally "silly".

The inconsistency in logic was just the biggest in your posts, hence I replied the first time




:/ I truly hope that this isnt the "height" of your debating skill, name calling and personal attacks. I'm disappointed.


For someone who doesn't care, you sure go out of your way nicely to respond.


Why? I like it here.



Actually, what you have done so far is the "equal" to sticking your head in the ground and going "la la la la".

On your "half" of the table, you have fabricated a time frame that isnt true (see your claim as to who "attcked" first), made personal attacks, presumed "interesting" things about other people (without any evidence).

As for "liking the answer", I'm still waiting for a logically "sound" answer.



Why?, do you need an appointment?

My GREEN E is greener than PILOTS green e.

 

[Aynmair]

This thread is getting too damn serious and way off track. I am not going to put it back on track at all, but I certainly won't be intentionally mean, just irreverent.

1. I exchanged a few pm with Lovecraft that were so genuine and polite, I had no idea if he were a he or a she. (Had an ambiguous avatar)

2. I read Lovecraft and thought he was a nice heterosexual man who writes well.

3. I read more Lovecraft and realized he is a deranged pervert who writes well. (And I mean that in the nicest way possible.)

4. Lovecraft's new avatar scares me, but he doesn't.

I'm afraid of it too. Call me a racist, but I'm terrified of black dogs. Also poodles and fox terriers.

We should take a poll of how many of us think LC's new avatar is scary. But it'll just egg him on ...