REDWAVE: One Question

Todd-'o'-Vision

Super xVirgin Man
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Posts
5,609
If you hate the capitalistic free republic of america why do you not renounce your citizenship and leave.

It would be the heroic thing to do, by staying you are admitting that you love the system. And living in Las Vegas of all places assures your love of Capitalism.

Your weak arguements would be much more applicable if you renounced your citizen ship and moved to a country that shared more of your views.
 
REDWAVE, your not ignoring my question are you

this post was right beside yours and had your name right on the title and you ignored it.

Your not afraid of the question are you?

If you hate the Capitilistic Republic of America why are you staying here? and why are you living in LasVegas one of the hottest hotseats of capitalism?
 
Well, I can't answer for what's his name but here's the reason I haven't moved to Sweden; I love my country so much that I want it to change for the better.

I can only accomplish that by staying.

What kind of world would it be if everyone who ran into something they hated ran?

I tell you what, it'd be like, it'd be like France.
 
Weevil said:
Well, I can't answer for what's his name but here's the reason I haven't moved to Sweden; I love my country so much that I want it to change for the better.

I can only accomplish that by staying.

What kind of world would it be if everyone who ran into something they hated ran?

I tell you what, it'd be like, it'd be like France.


We could all just pack up and move every three years till we have all circumnavigated the globe!:D
 
Redwave isn't going anywhere

It's a troll.

Their purpose in life is to irritate people and attract attention.
 
If redwave isn't a troll

I don't know what is.

I didn't say it was hurting anyone. In fact, it makes for some nice comic relief.

Please don't leave us redwave. I apologize.

:rolleyes:
 
Re: If redwave isn't a troll

miles said:
I don't know what is.


Well, the only way he could really be classified as a troll is if you thought he was a Lit member in disguise.

But he has a website and poetry and stuff so I doubt that.

You don't get to call anyone you don't like a troll, there are specific criteria.
 
Re: Re: Re: If redwave isn't a troll

lavender said:

We both say he isn't a troll. By no small leap of logic this makes REDWAVE not a troll.

What you mean we, White man?
 
lavender said:
Insect despot.

Yeah, they have one of those in my neighbourhood.

The prices and selection are good but it doesn't have the personality of my local bait shop.
 
If redwave is a regular Literotica user, who made up a new account just to cause trouble, then yes I'd call him a troll.

But if he is just a nut off the street then no, he ain't.
 
Trolls didn't arrive with the dawning of Lit, guys.

2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll

Yes, I do get to call redwave a troll. It loves insulting Lit members and childish name-calling (racist, obnoxious, etc.), but we all know that's okay if the abuse is directed against someone you disagree with.

Please don't start the "it has a right to be here" crap. Nobody is saying that.

And BTW, redwave has been nailed for the phony it is. Twice.
 
The beauty of free speech...

Redwave's arguments are on the table to be debunked.

If you look at the ratio of agreement vs. dissent to Red's British-style soapbox-in-the-park rantings, then you realize how little support his/her ideas have and how terribly lonely he/she/it is...

Red's hoping that in a commune-like environment, people can be ordered to play he/she/it...
 
miles said:
Trolls didn't arrive with the dawning of Lit, guys.

2. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that the have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll

Yes, I do get to call redwave a troll. It loves insulting Lit members and childish name-calling (racist, obnoxious, etc.), but we all know that's okay if the abuse is directed against someone you disagree with.

Please don't start the "it has a right to be here" crap. Nobody is saying that.

And BTW, redwave has been nailed for the phony it is. Twice.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOhhhh,

So anyone that ol perfect Miles doesnt like is a troll?

Then I guess by that standard...damn near most of us are.

What's the matter Miles?..run out of boogie men to intimidate and annoy?


If you are registered......YOU ARE NOT A TROLL...it's that easy Miles.

Sheesh


CH
 
crystalhunting

Excellent post. Very well thought out.

So anyone that ol perfect Miles doesnt like is a troll?

Better quit smoking that rock, dude. Your deductive reasoning skills are toast.
 
crystalhunting said:
If you are registered......YOU ARE NOT A TROLL...it's that easy Miles.

:confused: So any asshole who comes on specifically to cause hate and discontent is not a troll, provided they take two seconds to pick out a screen name? How does this make sense?
 
Re: crystalhunting

miles said:
Excellent post. Very well thought out.

So anyone that ol perfect Miles doesnt like is a troll?

Better quit smoking that rock, dude. Your deductive reasoning skills are toast.



OOOOOhhh Miles...Did I strike a nerve?

Sorry I don't smoke rock...that is for self-destructive people.

and my deductive reasoning skills are toast?

and you base this on what?

Everytime I see you...you are attacking someone.I don't have that rep.



CH
 
pagancowgirl said:


:confused: So any asshole who comes on specifically to cause hate and discontent is not a troll, provided they take two seconds to pick out a screen name? How does this make sense?



My dear Miss Cowgirl,


As insane as that sounds...that has been the standard since I have been here.

a registered person opens themselves to be seen for their horrible behavior,and can be fought with or ignored or ostrasized or whatever,

an unregistered person is too chicken shit to identify themselves,and you can't put them on ignore if they offend you.

I didn't make these standards...they were allready in place...if you dont believe me...ask some of those who have been here a while.



CH
 
What's with all this anti-REDWAVE shit...

here and on his Poll thread.

Is your self confidence and self esteem so low that you can't hear an opinion different from your own, backed up with well written and well structured, arguments, without breaking out into the pack mentality.

All you're doing is making yourselves look like arseholes without any thought in your heads beyond what I would normally expect to read from a teenager. And a mentally retarded one at that.

You, my dear "freedom loving" fools, are exactly the type of people that give America the reputation it has of being an arrogant, uninformed bully.

If you're not with us "yer agin us". "Hey fellahs now we're all here let's go and kick REDWAVE's arse. it's time he learnt who's boss 'round here."

With idiots like you around no wonder Bush's rating is still fairly high...

ppman
 
miles said:
ROFLMAO!

"Freedom loving fools."

Good Lord.

What's the matter miles?

You don't recognise heavy sarcasm when you see it?

No, I suppose you wouldn't...

:p
 
Back
Top