Rationale

And an illegal immigrant is currently said to be getting screwed by the head of a Federal Executive protection service.
 

What was his "plan?"

You know, after the "deferred" time was up and it's time to take "action," what action was going to be taken, and when?

The only thing that this "plan" involved was deferring taking any action until it became some other presidents problem.

Great plan!

Same idea he had about deferring the action required by statute to delay having the consequences of Obamacare kick in until after he was re-elected.

...or just deferring a decision about when and how many troops to send to Afghanistan until after the fighting season is over because it's too cold for anybody to go out and fight.

That man could defer like a boss!
 
The topic is DACA, dumbass.

DACA "kids" were and are illegal aliens. The fact that Obama decided to defer action on faithfully enforcing the law on an entire class of lawbreakers did not change that objective fact in anyway. The subject at hand was your claim that DACA recipients are not eligible for the very benefits that they were getting before and after Obama took his illegal non action. "Elgibility" has absolutely nothing to do with whether they are or are not receiving such benefits they clearly are receiving such benefits.
Do you think that the local benefits office says oh wait you're a DACA recipient okay well that portion of your family that qualifies for DACA doesn't isn't going to be given these benefits that you've been getting since your family's arrival. They are getting benefits have been getting benefits for the most part ever since they arrived.

You pretending that they aren't when the raw numbers of government beneficiarys says otherwise is just stupid. You're the one making an absolutely unsupported claim.

You seem to like the idea of them being exempt from deportation as do many Americans. For the most part I would include myself in that majority. That being the case, why would you object to the poor who happen to be DACA receiving financial assistance from the state? Why do you feel the need to pretend that it is not happening?

What do you, personally, think should happen to any DACA recipient who is currently receiving any of those benefits that you claim they are ineligible for?

Should they be thrown off the benefit program prosecuted for fraud and withdrawn from the DACA program? Maybe deported?

Or should we just keep doing what we're doing having a bunch of Spanish-speaking welfare clerks assisting them with making sure that their needs are taken care of?

Why is it that you Progressive insist on lying about reality to pretend that something that is happening isn't happening?

There's a very definite plan by the DNC to import more voters. When the last round of this circus was played out they got the amnesty that they wanted the Republicans never got border security and none of those that received amnesty suddenly became Republican voters out of gratitude for the amnesty that the Republicans made possible. It's nothing personal they didn't hate Republicans it's just by design they were imported underclass low-skilled low-paid workers who were going to add to the Democrat base. The DNC doesn't give a fuck whether the people voting are or are not legal are or are not eligible to vote are or are not eligible for benefits all they want is a larger and larger dependent class grateful to them for those benefits. Why can't you just admit it is a pretty effective plan?
 
DACA "kids" were and are illegal aliens.
Civil violation, not criminal.

Violation committed by parents, not minor children.

Unconstitutional to punish children ('attainder') for parents' misdeeds.

Try again.
 
Still no linkie, troll?

No, you haven't provided a link to a single case of anyone being denied benefits, much less prosecuted for applying for benefits due to their "undocumented" status.

Why do you want it illegal aliens to starve? Do you or do you not think that people who are not here illegally who are hungry should be denied SNAP benefits? Simple question: yes or no.
 
No, you haven't provided a link to a single case of anyone being denied benefits, much less prosecuted for applying for benefits due to their "undocumented" status.

Why do you want it illegal aliens to starve? Do you or do you not think that people who are not here illegally who are hungry should be denied SNAP benefits? Simple question: yes or no.
"Yes."
 
That's not good enough for tranny boi, he will be along shortly to move the goal posts once again.
I'm hoping he'll explain why someone applying for benefits for which they aren't eligible would be prosecuted.
 
I'm afraid that's probably asking too much of a guy who denies anthropogenic climate change.
 
I'm hoping he'll explain why someone applying for benefits for which they aren't eligible would be prosecuted.

Fraud. Anything else that's deeply troubling your understanding?

they have little to fear though given that state agencies have a distinct don't ask don't tell policy about one's immigration status.
 
The same people crying and screaming because DACA kids or their parents "broke the law"--broke the law!!!!!---are the same ones now attacking and undermining and threating our national security by attacking and attempting to discredit the FBI.

They don't give a fuck about the "law."

It's about racism, pure and simple.
 
The same people crying and screaming because DACA kids or their parents "broke the law"--broke the law!!!!!---are the same ones now attacking and undermining and threating our national security by attacking and attempting to discredit the FBI.
For DACA kids and most undocumenteds it's a civil offense, nothing criminal. Bust a bribe-taking pol instead.
 
Back
Top