Colleen Thomas
Ultrafemme
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2002
- Posts
- 21,545
Virtual_Burlesque said:Colly,
I was unable to judge presidents of the last half century, due to brevity of time for their records to resolve from the swirl of current events. Since you did, I wonder at your reluctance to include JFK in the list of Great Presidents.
Whatever else we learn about what was really going on during the Cuban Missile Crises, one thing is already quite clear. The entire world was very close to a nuclear exchange which could have changed life on this planet, as we know it, possibly even the eradication of all life. That Kennedy exerted a calming influence on America’s war hawks, is public record.
What is emerging out of recently available Russian documents, is that the brinkmanship of that event was far more dire than we knew before. For example, there were four Russian nuclear submarines off the east coast, whose skippers had been given permission to fire their missiles, without recourse to Moscow.
Consider some of the less steady cold warriors who have occupied that office. What would have happened, had the crises occurred on their watch?
Some of the credit must go to the steady hand of Kruschev, in Moscow, also working for a way out of the impasse. There are still a few pieces missing, for historians to piece together a fully accurate account of the events.
However, John F. Kennedy – for Americans – was tested by the most severe crises of the nuclear age, and brought us through without any nearby mushroom clouds. I think that’s pretty Great!
In passing, how could such an appraisal be managed? Quite a few of them would probably encounter difficulty ... er ... deploying the equipment to be rated — even amongst the living presidents!
LOL,
I have no ide ahow it would be accomplished. But it would be a fun way to rate them would it not?
For me JFK falls into that select group of a select group. Those president's who died in office. How can you rate them, so much of their legacy is based on the promise they held. He did bring us through the Cuban missile crisis, but he, as much as anyone created the crisis too. That isn't to say that I don't think he did the right thing, but in the judgement of most of the world at the time, we (the U.S.) were in the wrong. Cuba is a soverign state, and if they forge a military alliance with the U.S.S.R. and nuclear proliferation occurrs, that's how it works. Strictly speaking, our blockade of Cuba and the interdiction of soviet ships was against international law. JFK was running just as maverick as GWB is, drawing on his status as C-inC to defy international law when the best interests of the U.S. were at stake. And while Bush is playing with the lives of thousands, JFK was playing for stakes much higher.
As I said, this was meant to be fun. I fully expected someone with an ironic sense of humor to rate them from top to bottom by their sexual escapades (it is a porn site after all).
-Colly

