Rape/Nonconsent idea

[Nonconsent]

I am looking for an author that excells in the rape/nonconsent category. I have an idea for a story that I would like to see come to fruition, but not just any author could write this.
If you are an author that is looking to expand your horizons and maybe try writing a rape/nonconsent story, I support you, but sorry, you're not what I'm looking for.
If you have written a rape/nonconsent story that was denied by literotica as being too graphic, too violent, or just plain too good, please get in touch with me.
No, my story is not violence based, but that's the kind of out there mind that I'm looking for to write this.
Reply here or PM me if you are interested. Thanks.

 

[LindsayRae]

I am looking for an author that excells in the rape/nonconsent category. I have an idea for a story that I would like to see come to fruition, but not just any author could write this.
If you are an author that is looking to expand your horizons and maybe try writing a rape/nonconsent story, I support you, but sorry, you're not what I'm looking for.
If you have written a rape/nonconsent story that was denied by literotica as being too graphic, too violent, or just plain too good, please get in touch with me.
No, my story is not violence based, but that's the kind of out there mind that I'm looking for to write this.
Reply here or PM me if you are interested. Thanks.

Just remember, if you're looking for authors whose stories were not accepted at Lit for breaking the rules, your requested story will also not be accepted (if along the same lines). So, that said, are you asking the authors to put the time and effort into a good story that they can not "publish" online (Ie: Lit)?

 

[Nonconsent]

I was wondering how long it would be before someone like you came along.
Anyway, to answer your important question, I am looking for an author who is unafraid to take chances. An author who doesn't dwell on the rules first and the story as an afterthought. I would rather the story come first and then apply the template of the rules in the course of editing. Write the story the way it deserves to be told, and when you have reached that point, then go through and say "I don't think this would fly, so let's change that language here. Instead of describing this in detail, let's just alude to it having happened. Etc."
If you can't understand what I mean, you're definitely not the author I'm looking for.
One excellent candidate has already gotten in touch with me. They haven't agreed to it yet, so if you're up for it, please still get in touch with me because my idea is not just a challenge, it's got some pretty unique source material to work with as a foundation that has already proven very popular with millions of internet users.
Thanks

 

[Guest]

This sounds awesome. I hope you find someone, I'd LOVE to read that.

 

[Nonconsent]

I figure that maybe if I give a little more information on my idea, maybe it will attract the right author.
To begin with, there is almost no violence involved (unless the author feels it would serve a purpose). It is more about coercion, intimidation, manipulation, confusion and exploitation of good old fashion gullability.
Unless you were home schooled, then we all knew that girl that was the hottest girl in our class, probably even the hottest girl in the school. Looks aren't everything, but it sure made her life easier for her than yours was for you. She didn't have to study all that hard because she was probably going to marry a guy that would make enough so that she wouldn't have to work. So she probably wasn't the brightest, or, at least, she didn't make the most of what intellect she had. Think of Megan Fox in the beginning of the first Transformers movie. That is how I envision this girl.
Apply the psychological concepts mentioned above to that girl. At first start out with a heavy dose of "I can't believe I'm doing this" leading gradually to more and more humiliation as she feels trapped in this situation and helpless to do anything but what is demanded of her as the situation gets more and more bizare, eventually leading to her being degraded, used, raped, and in all other ways humiliated.
For more of the details, including the reference material that has shaped this fantasy for me, PM me.

Thanks

 

[Sean Renaud]

Why not post all the info here, you'll get more and better responses.

 

[Nonconsent]

Good question. This is my first time pitching an idea out there, and you, with your over 4,000 posts, are obviously much more experienced than me in this.
To answer your question, I have to admit that it comes down to comfort level. I understand that this is a place dedicated to talking about our kinks and turn ons. But I am new here, and not yet completely comfortable with discussing my kinks and turn ons with the thousands of users of this board, plus future users as well. But in a one on one discussion, I am more comfortable.
Silly, I know. But that's where I am right now.

 

[snoopercharmbrights]

Good question. This is my first time pitching an idea out there, and you, with your over 4,000 posts, are obviously much more experienced than me in this.
To answer your question, I have to admit that it comes down to comfort level. I understand that this is a place dedicated to talking about our kinks and turn ons. But I am new here, and not yet completely comfortable with discussing my kinks and turn ons with the thousands of users of this board, plus future users as well. But in a one on one discussion, I am more comfortable.
Silly, I know. But that's where I am right now.

Sounds reasonable to me.

 

[Nonconsent]

Thanks for the back up Snooper.

 

[CopperSkink]

You've talked yourself into a little bit of a circle here. First, you claimed your "source material" was unique. I'm sure it is, since we're all unique people, and one idea has yet to be exactly the same as the other. But your "foundation" claim gives me the hiccups. "Already proved popular with millions of internet users," quothe you. You said this work is to be a challenge, but all you're doing is copying another gimmic that's already popular while telling everyone you have a unique twist to it, which you won't describe. And "humiliating the popular girl in class" isn't a unique twist; it's a very played-out twist.
We're all used to people saying their own ideas are unique, exciting, and popular. We're also used to people saying their work is "too risqué for Literotica." Both are a bit of a problem, for why would you come here for Literotica authors asking for something not meant for Literotica?
I've seen much here, but I've never seen content that was "too good for Literotica" as you put it. To this date, I've only heard of one person saying his work was too good, but I can only assume that since "too good" was a separate item from "too graphic" and "too violent" and since you yourself are not the author, you must think that the work you're being involved in only as the creative mind and not the writing will be "too good for Literotica" because that's the quality of your idea. Ideas are nice, but it's the ability and style of the writer, not the creative content, that makes a story. Please allow me to assure you that your ideas are not too good for Literotica.
For another thing, please don't imply that because Literotica has rules that a story you want someone to write for you can be "too graphic" or "too violent," especially after just saying that what you're offering isn't necessarily violent.
And "Internet" is a proper location, therefore capitalize it. And "already popular with millions of internet users" is a weasel phrase, which is to say that it sounds impressive when you say it, it's really nothing more than impressive-sounding and in no way fact for the sheer virtue of you saying it. What you want to do is say, "The genre/idea/concept/"platform" has enjoyed sucesses in such-and-such numbers due to books such as such-and-such and such-as." Rather than tell everyone millions of people are bound to like your ideas, you could say that you're copying popularized work that we your audience can see for ourselves to gauge rather than just take your word for it. Or, you could come up with something new, saying, "My idea is new, but I like it." Both honest and humble, two very appealing qualities to we authors/editors/readers/jellyfish.
tl;dr No one's going to bat an eyelash if you want to get a rape fantasy story written, but it's probably not the best idea to claim you've got a record-breaker on your hands. That's the writer's job to break records.

 

[Nonconsent]

Did I say that I have a "record breaker" on my hands? I don't believe that I did. For that matter, did I actually say that my idea is "too good" for lit? I don't believe that I did. Maybe that implies that I would like to meet the person who has had an idea and a writing style that was somehow "too good" for lit because that person is the kind of mind that I would like to set loose on my idea. I should also quote something that was said to me by a prospective author, "Breaking the rules is not a problem - I would just post it on storiesonline.net where anything goes." Now THAT'S the kind of person that I would love to have working on turning my idea into a story. Unfortunately for me, that particular author will not be writing my story, but they did give some excellent feedback. Our conversation caused me to delve deeper into the darker parts of my mind and figure out exactly what I like about my idea so much, and how it applies to real people. It was true constructive critisizm.
Try this: "Excuse me Sir, but I don't understand exactly what you mean by "already popular with millions of internet users." How do you reconcile that with feeling that it is unique? Are you implying that you have a unique twist on an already established and popular genre/idea/concept/ platform? Or are you saying something else? I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you are well aware of the fact that "humiliating the popular girl in class" is a well established idea. So there must be more to it than that. Am I correct? Also, why on earth (or the internet) would you come to an internet forum full of authors to find......an experienced author to write your story? Would your story be publishable on literotica? I don't know and would appreciate some clarification so I can sleep at night." That would be quite honest and humble and I hear they are very appealing qualities around here.
As for "too graphic" and "too violent," I might as well point out that my first time in the lit forum I came across mulitple mentions of stories being rejected for violence and being "too graphic." I'm sure that a lit veteran such as yourself has come across the same thing, so I don't understand what your point is. But, as I have already explained, maybe you just didn't read it, it's not the violence that I am looking for. I admire the mind that came up with something that was too violent for lit. Taking that same mind and applying it to my story idea is analogous to climbing into a sports car that is capable of doing 140mph and taking it for a sunday drive. I'm not going to take it up to 140 mph. But the fact that I could if I want to is nice, and it implies that it will be able to handle the 75 mph that I do plan on, with ease and finesse.

 

[CopperSkink]

You're still not capitalizing "Internet." Might want to work on that before you hire your sports car to run out for groceries.

 

[Nonconsent]

You're still not capitalizing "Internet." Might want to work on that before you hire your sports car to run out for groceries.

Yes, it was intentional. Thought you'd catch that.

 

[CopperSkink]

I'm a volunteer editor, after all. My job is to find out what people are doing wrong that their audience is scowling at, and they don't usually ask me to "break them in gently" when I tell them what they're doing wrong.

 

[Nonconsent]

Thank you for your contributions to the lit community. it's people like you that make this magic happen for the rest of us. Except, i'm not writing a story here and submitting it to you for volunteer editing. i'm writing posts in a thread. i imagine that a different standard applies to an editor or a volunteer editor, as at all times they should represent themselves with the highest regard for grammar, spelling, and everything else that the rest of us never paid attention to because english class was... boring.
On the other hand, who am i? i am not an editor, nor a volunteer editor. i am not even an author. i am a nobody, with just barely over 10 posts. if i forget to capitalize every i in my post, it's no big deal. Nobody will cry, because it's not a story, it's just a post.
Constructive critisizm, i appreciate when i ask for it. Nit picking, we can save for when i'm submitting a story for editing.
Thanks.

 

[CopperSkink]

You may want to differentiate saying "lit community" and "Literotica" as they aren't necessarily synonymous. And I'm sorry if you didn't learn to spell or use grammar in your English classes in high school; I had the very experience. I had to pay for it in college before I finally found an instructor who actually cared enough about learning. Actually, it's what drove me to become a volunteer editor. All I had to do was drive myself to learn my grammar (I still can't spell my way out of a package of teethpaste).

The discouragement in being a volunteer editor happens when there are people who clearly show no interest in learning or in any way improving themselves, only in being perfect in the shell they came in and wanting to share their perfection with the rest of the world. Of course this causes a lot of heartbreak for everyone, especially the jellyfish themselves who don't understand why the anonymous masses don't take to their finely-tuned lectures like words of the Scripture itself.

 

[Nonconsent]

I thInk that the most mature thIng we can do Is to take thIs opportunIty to learn a few lessons from each other and thus Improve ourselves.
FIrst, I wIll learn to capItolIze the I In the word Internet, because apparantly, ambIguous though It Is, the Internet Is a "propper locatIon" (propper noun Is what my englIsh teachers called It). Also, If I forgot to capItolIze any I's In thIs post, feel free to tell me all about It.

Second, I wIll offer a couple of lessons for you as an opportunity to Improve yourself, so you can lead by example, lest you break other volunteer edItors' hearts.
1.) There Is a board called Story Feedback that Is full of people looking for the kInd of advice you specIalIze In. If there Is a tIme and a place for everythIng, It seems lIke that Is the place.
2.) Try not to take yourself so serIously. When you take yourself too serIously, people tend to take you less serIously and even Ignore you.
3.) "...wantIng to share theIr perfectIon wIth the rest of the world" sounds a lot lIke the nIt picking over an uncapitolIzed letter. In fact, that whole paragraph could have been wrItten about your posts In thIs thread. Out of nowhere you appear with a "finely-tuned lecture;" you Impose your unsolIcIted perfectIonIsm on me, and don't understand why I don't take to it "lIke words of the ScrIpture Itself."

 

[CopperSkink]

Great; I feel like I'm in high school again. "Same to you, buddy," would've been much faster.

But since you're asking, yes, I think it's very cute that you attempt to display your maturity by capitalizing every "I" in your post just for me. Also, "English" is one of those "proper nouns" your teacher was telling you about. But it's not a location like the Internet; it's labled under "idea". But if you think the Internet is ambiguous, you might want to rethink your forum for sharing your ideas with the world. There are plenty of places in the real world that are nowhere near as ambiguous, but I hear travel is a bit difficult these days.

 

[mcevin]

Quibbler's Lullaby

So I was, like, following the thread, looking for more info. Not happening. Instead, I was getting a rerun (or is it re-run) of my junior high days.

This isn't at all unusual on message boards, they bring out the worst in people. (Catch the comma-splice?)

Oh my god, can I SAY anything about being in junior high? It's not about sex. I didn't know anything about sex until I was 18. (Omg, I'm not under oath, am I?) Anyway, my English teacher taught me to write. I was like, the grammar grrl. I could diagram all the sentences, tell an infinitive from a gerund, and correct everything everyone else ever said. I also couldn't put two words together.

My teacher was like, "Jamie, why can't you write? You talk all the time! You talk in class, you talk in the hall, you talk on the bus, you even talk in the bathroom, just write like you talk!"

So I'm like, under my breath, "Write AS you talk." But just for once, I stopped being a smart-ass, and actually listened to someone else. It changed my life.

Then, as now, I just write like I talk, with the "uh" and "okay, okay, it's like..." and it just flows. So sometimes I edit out the valley girl, like on my MBA thesis. Sometimes I don't. Writing is about what you say, not about how much grammar you know. I do appreciate my editor, though, on scholarly stuff that gets published. But someone has to actually WRITE it first. THEN you can quibble.

So quibble away, that way nothing actually gets written. That's the quibbler's lullaby, isn't it?

I certify that nothing in this post refers to sex, by anyone, of any age, at any time.

Love,

Jamie

 

[Nonconsent]

Great; I feel like I'm in high school again. "Same to you, buddy," would've been much faster.

But since you're asking, yes, I think it's very cute that you attempt to display your maturity by capitalizing every "I" in your post just for me. Also, "English" is one of those "proper nouns" your teacher was telling you about. But it's not a location like the Internet; it's labled under "idea". But if you think the Internet is ambiguous, you might want to rethink your forum for sharing your ideas with the world. There are plenty of places in the real world that are nowhere near as ambiguous, but I hear travel is a bit difficult these days.

"Same to you, buddy" is a weasel phrase. It says nothing beause, if I say it to you now, you don't know what I'm referring to. Therefore it is a meaningless waste of communication.
As for English/enlish, you will recall that I did NOT ask you for correction on any uncapitolized propper nouns. I limited my request to the letter I.
I say that the Internet is ambiguous because it is not a location that I can go to. I can not be located on the Internet because the Internet is not the "real world," as you put it. That is why it did not occur to me that it is a "propper location." This ambiguity (I can use the word "vague" if that would be less confusing for you) has no negative connotation, so I don't understand why you think I need to rethink my "forum for sharing your [sic] ideas with the world."
I'm convinced that somewhere out there in this great big (and ambiguous or vague) Internet, there is someone who is in need of your volunteer editing. But I don't think that person is in this thread. I am also convinced that I am not that person.

 

[CopperSkink]

You can't go to the Moon either, yet that doesn't stop it from being a proper place. The simple solution is to of course check one of many English references on the Internet so as to ask whether or not it's proper. But then, that's my job as an editor to know so authors can get back to authoring.

"Weasel phrase" doesn't refer to a sentence that's defined by a lack of information. Rather, it implies that something is truth by insinuating that certain fact is fact for less-than-verifiable reasons. "Most people think so," is such a phrase. It can be proven, but only if the majority of the entire population of the world is questioned. Or if you want to choose a more specific people, "Nearly everyone in my school thinks the same way I do." This is much closer to reality because the speaker can certainly attend school, and everyone in that school has a name that can be referenced if anyone cares to ask. Still, it's unlikely that the entire school has been individually interviewed as to the topic on-hand. If they have, and if the interviewer cites his work properly, then the phrase is still weasel because it's up to speculation what "most of the school" actually denotes. Some may insist that it means only one person on the entire campus thinks otherwise, wheres someone else may think that "nearly everyone" means himself and a few others he thinks would agree, whether or not he's asked them.
"This guy over here, name and number, is quoted as saying the following," isn't a weasel phrase because everything can be documented and cited.
Hope this helps, and "proper" only has two "P"s. And if you're going to say "Only asked you to do that with the letter I" you may want to put quotes around "I" so that I know exactly what you're talking about. Otherwise, you could be implying you want me to look at your entire blog.
Hope this helps, and don't be afraid to ask for more help; it's what I'm here for.

 

[klmar1963]

Damn! copperlink and nonconsent. Enough already. LOL You two sound like you are married.

 

[Nonconsent]

There are two things that you don't know, klmar1963:

1. - Maybe we are married. Or, at least, he's my bitch.

2. - While copperskank may have hijacked this thread by caring more about demonstrating his self-importance than the subject of the initial post, he serves a purpose and I am using him for that. You see, were it not for copperskink, this thread would have been buried by now, and fewer people would have come across it, and fewer authors would have seen it and contacted me about it. I could be all kinds of lame and just "bump" it, but that just isn't my style. Instead, I play copperskink like a fiddle, tweaking and goading and getting him to continue bumping the thread back up to the top. He is doing his part dutifully and that is why I call him my bitch.

 

[Nonconsent]

You can't go to the Moon either, yet that doesn't stop it from being a proper place. The simple solution is to of course check one of many English references on the Internet so as to ask whether or not it's proper. But then, that's my job as an editor to know so authors can get back to authoring.

"Weasel phrase" doesn't refer to a sentence that's defined by a lack of information. Rather, it implies that something is truth by insinuating that certain fact is fact for less-than-verifiable reasons. "Most people think so," is such a phrase. It can be proven, but only if the majority of the entire population of the world is questioned. Or if you want to choose a more specific people, "Nearly everyone in my school thinks the same way I do." This is much closer to reality because the speaker can certainly attend school, and everyone in that school has a name that can be referenced if anyone cares to ask. Still, it's unlikely that the entire school has been individually interviewed as to the topic on-hand. If they have, and if the interviewer cites his work properly, then the phrase is still weasel because it's up to speculation what "most of the school" actually denotes. Some may insist that it means only one person on the entire campus thinks otherwise, wheres someone else may think that "nearly everyone" means himself and a few others he thinks would agree, whether or not he's asked them.
"This guy over here, name and number, is quoted as saying the following," isn't a weasel phrase because everything can be documented and cited.
Hope this helps, and "proper" only has two "P"s. And if you're going to say "Only asked you to do that with the letter I" you may want to put quotes around "I" so that I know exactly what you're talking about. Otherwise, you could be implying you want me to look at your entire blog.
Hope this helps, and don't be afraid to ask for more help; it's what I'm here for.

Errrr.... Does anyone whose work you've volunteer edited know that you think "you can't go to the Moon?" I think that they might want to be made aware of that, because they would probably want a different volunteer editor. I'm just spitballing here, but I'm guessing that you don't volunteer edit for Neil Armstrong. If you were to, he might check his many Space references on the Internet and inform you that yes, indeed, you can go to the Moon. You can be located on the Moon. It is even possible for something to be from the Moon.

 

[snoopercharmbrights]

... This isn't at all unusual on message boards, they bring out the worst in people. (Catch the comma-splice?) ...

Yes - perhaps next year they will teach you about semi-colons.