Rangerettes Get T-ball Trophies

J

JAMESBJOHNSON

Guest
But wont be serving as Rangers. Its how affirmative action works.
 
But wont be serving as Rangers. Its how affirmative action works.

Thank god....hopefully Regiment gets to keep it's standards and doesn't get hit with the "Except women...they can suck and you have to live with it!" bullshit.
 
Thank god....hopefully Regiment gets to keep it's standards and doesn't get hit with the "Except women...they can suck and you have to live with it!" bullshit.

I like it! ARMY WOMEN SUCK!
 
Show of hands. Who believes the girls passed all the tests?
 
I wonder if this will open the door to women needing to sign up for the draft.
 

As the dude said in his post, it doesn't matter, the retards won't believe it because they're misogynistic cunts and the facts don't fit their world view.

Actually that doesn't discredit any of the shit we are talking about.

Women are held to lower standards than men....they have been dropping standards for women for FOUR YEARS and hammering RTB to pass a female since 2011.

So after several drops in standards...sorry sorry "REVIEWS" of the standards :rolleyes: tens of millions spent over years and some 200+ failures...they managed to pass 2 females....

Glad the military's priorities are straight :rolleyes:

There should be 1 fucking standard...that of the job. BUT NOOOOOOOOOOO all the "fuck achievement EVERYONE get's a Ranger tab!!" douche nozzles like you twatcicles don't care about the job, or achieving shit. All you guys care about is fairness in results.....you don't even pretend anymore with your "opportunity" lies....

Keep dropping standards guys...just like public schools the military is at a dead sprint for the lowest common denominator.

Next victim....Slection, everyone gets a long tab!!:rolleyes:

I wonder if this will open the door to women needing to sign up for the draft.

LOL fuck no.....that wouldn't be fair to women.
 
Last edited:
That's two more women who can kick the crap out of Mr. Johnson.
 
Anyone want to take a guess when DC forces SFAS to drop standards until women start passing because that's fair?

I bet by 2020 the cries of women who want the promotion points without having to eat their own vomit after they desecrate the instructors sand pit with their vile display of weakness. LONG TABS FOR EVERYONE!!!!


OH SERE school....bet that's on the chopping block too. If it hasn't already been turned into an arts n' crafts camp.
 
Last edited:
http://www.tokyo-top-guide.com/images/Sumo_Wrestlers.jpg



Photo courtesy of LADYVER

As Chief Misogynistic Cunt at LIT I know plenty of facts about violence and sexual differences. Males come from the factory pre-wired for aggression, its what testosterone is for. Our cups runneth over. Females are pre-wired to think and feel and debate before battle. Males generally react to provocation immediately. Males are impulsive. Females wanna nag and scold and threaten and flee, first. Females aren't warriors, tho many are natural born Sumo wrestlers. See picture above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.tokyo-top-guide.com/images/Sumo_Wrestlers.jpg

As Chief Misogynistic Cunt at LIT I know plenty of facts about violence and sexual differences. Males come from the factory pre-wired for aggression, its what testosterone is for. Our cups runneth over. Females are pre-wired to think and feel and debate before battle. Males generally react to provocation immediately. Males are impulsive. Females wanna nag and scold and threaten and flee, first. Females aren't warriors, tho many are natural born Sumo wrestlers. See picture above.

if one disregards the sl. misogynistic tinge, a lot of truth there, actually…
and this time, he's criticizing Both genders
 
I bet by 2020 the cries of women who want the promotion points without having to eat their own vomit after they desecrate the instructors sand pit with their vile display of weakness.

unlike you, BB. Sounds like you've been talking out of your ass again, just like your av. Why so angry about women, tonight?
 
if one disregards the sl. misogynistic tinge, a lot of truth there, actually…
and this time, he's criticizing Both genders

I recently read a philosophy of violence book by a martial arts-military-corrections authority who spent 30 years in prisons. Females wanna negotiate, males wanna lock horns. Female guards don't wanna shoot first and ask questions later.

In Vietrnam official policy was blabber first, then shoot. But during my combat prep training the instructors insisted we shoot first, and talk about it later. And its what I did when I hadda kill someone. It was him or me, I was concealed in a culvert, he hadda weapon, and my orders were to kill whatever came hopping down the bunny trail. I got him with the first shot, then fired two warning shots per the official pussy rules.

I say use females in combat support roles where their natural traits are superior to males. Combat support, by the way, are specialties like helicopter and airplane mechanics, parachute riggers, medics, transport, etc.
 
I recently read a philosophy of violence book by a martial arts-military-corrections authority who spent 30 years in prisons. Females wanna negotiate, males wanna lock horns. Female guards don't wanna shoot first and ask questions later.

In Vietrnam official policy was blabber first, then shoot. But during my combat prep training the instructors insisted we shoot first, and talk about it later. And its what I did when I hadda kill someone. It was him or me, I was concealed in a culvert, he hadda weapon, and my orders were to kill whatever came hopping down the bunny trail. I got him with the first shot, then fired two warning shots per the official pussy rules.

I say use females in combat support roles where their natural traits are superior to males. Combat support, by the way, are specialties like helicopter and airplane mechanics, parachute riggers, medics, transport, etc.

I agree. Just adding to that :

I don't quite get why feminists would be so up & arms about this.
This is not a discussion about gender equality at the workplace and the fact that women have been catching up & doing as well as men since given some rights a few decades ago. (I would be among those crying out "misogynists!" if people were disputing That)

The life of a soldier is different. It's a matter of survival, he's expected to even sacrifice his life at some point. And for their own good/survival, they Need to select those who would be able to make it aka those with better body strength etc. And indeed, generally the ugly sex is doing better from that pov.

And let's not forget about the countless cases of PTSD or guilt after facing death, or after killing someone in battle.
I remember this gripping novel that I once read, about a soldier who came home from battle. He felt that he no longer belonged, as his previous worldview has been completely shattered by what he's seen in battle, and all his former interests and friends now seemed so alien and shallow…
 
Last edited:
unlike you, BB.

That's right....I earned my cool guy stuff back when they had standards. BEFORE they just started passing them out like gold stars to 3rd graders for just showing the fuck up.

Sounds like you've been talking out of your ass again,

How so exactly?

just like your av. Why so angry about women, tonight?

Not mad about women....mad about the Army for dropping standards to let them do shit they are unqualified for in the name of fairness.

Women want a Ranger tab? They need to do 77 push ups in less than 2 min.....run a 2 mile run in 12 fucking min or less, before they are even allowed to apply. That's just to start....rucking and all that other shit needs to be top 1% status too. Combat shoot house? Better be flawless....can't carry 300lb buddy with 120lbs of your shit on at a dead sprint for 10 fucking miles? no expert shot? No Ranger school. It has been and should still be that simple....instead we got fairness.

It's supposed to be the best of the best, the most elite. NOT the most fair and trophies for everyone!

Why do women get the double standard exception in the name of fairness?
 
Last edited:
I agree. Just adding to that :

I don't quite get why feminists would be so up & arms about this.
This is not a discussion about gender equality at the workplace and the fact that women have been catching up & doing as well as men since given some rights a few decades ago. (I would be among those crying out "misogynists!" if people were disputing That)

The life of a soldier is different. It's a matter of survival, he's expected to even sacrifice his life at some point. And for their own good/survival, they Need to select those who would be able to make it aka those with better body strength etc. And indeed, generally the ugly sex is doing better from that pov.

And let's not forget about the countless cases of PTSD or guilt after facing death, or after killing someone in battle.
I remember this gripping novel that I once read, about a soldier who came home from battle. He felt that he no longer belonged, as his previous worldview has been completely shattered by what he's seen in battle, and all his former interests and friends now seemed so alien and shallow…

Feminists don't care about risk they want gals in power positions to influence the distribution of money and services. They cant care less if girls are 24 carat Amazons, but the Ranger/Seal badge is the ticket to rise, and gals gotta have one. Feminists demand Affirmative Action badges and other awards. Gals will soon demand high prestige awards with no requirement for courage or self sacrifice. Purple hearts for periods will be common.
 
Aren't you the one who chose your own MO?
"I'm a skunk"? (the av)

I chose my own Missouri? :confused:

What about the AV?

What does any of this have to do with the Army relaxing standards in the name of fairness for women?
 
Last edited:
Both women who passed the Rangers test volunteered to carry weight for other soldiers so they could complete the course.
 
What is it with all the chest-thumping dishonesty in military circles? John Kerry never earned his medals, John McCain was a war hero, and women can never be as good as men. I'm tired of hearing that song. Put up the evidence or shut up, soldier.
 
What is it with all the chest-thumping dishonesty in military circles? John Kerry never earned his medals, John McCain was a war hero, and women can never be as good as men. I'm tired of hearing that song. Put up the evidence or shut up, soldier.

Their bias is built in from the start at the base line....always has been always will be. Without it we would be right back to 2011 when the girls first tried with the volume all the way up, 100% NO GO. 130 of the militaries finest women, 48hrs? Every single one of them quit or in the hospital......

And that's just not fair now is it ;)

http://www.military.com/military-fitness/army-fitness-requirements/army-pft-two-mile-run-score-chart

http://www.military.com/military-fi...ements/army-physical-fitness-test-score-chart

http://www.military.com/military-fitness/army-fitness-requirements/army-pft-sit-up-score-chart

I'm all for equality....but let's be real, women aren't treated as such in the military. None of them, they all get a handicap otherwise there would be a grand total of like 8 women in the entire military.

Both women who passed the Rangers test volunteered to carry weight for other soldiers so they could complete the course.

Everyone volunteers for that.....that doesn't make them fucking special.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top