Quiz: Art or Porn?

Sub Joe said:
"The Blue Angel" was a pretty crap film. ...
I got the "Kurasawa" wrong. Thee BDSM imagery in some of his stuff, like "Throne of Blood", confused me there.
Joe, I'm so glad you said that. I never got Blue Angel as a great film, glad for it though for the reasons you mentioned. (btw, I have a friend whose godmother was Dietrich.) At risk I'll say nearly all Japanese films have bdsm subtexts or threads (yeah, an exaggeration, I get what you say re. Kurosawa. P.

L&L: I think you took Svenska way too seriously.
 
Damn, I'm good. 10/10.

I knew three of the movies mentioned, so only had to 'guess' the other seven, but I thought it was pretty obvious. All the photos marked as 'porn' are a bit messy, incidental. And the lighting is terrible.

I suppose the difference between Art and Porn in photos/movies is in the Art Direction. A rather pleonastic thought, but there you go...
 
perdita said:
L&L: I think you took Svenska way too seriously.

Actually P, I doubt that very much, but I'm open (as always) to persuasion on that.

She won't talk to me anyway, so it's of little consequence.
 
lewdandlicentious said:
Actually P, I doubt that very much, but I'm open (as always) to persuasion on that.
She won't talk to me anyway, so it's of little consequence.
ll, ok, I really thought she was being sarcastic. May I ask why you would bother posting to her then. That's a plain question, no subtext, whatever. P.
 
Tatelou said:
Bloody hell, I got 9 out of 10. Pure guesswork on my part, neither reason 1 nor reason 2 apply to me. I must have an eye for porn, though, and must admit my HDD is chocka with contemporary porn. :eek:

Lou

Wanna share some of your HDD, I like a hard one myself, much better than backing up onto a 3.5 inch floppy.

Oh the quiz, it appears I'm a lost cause devoted to nothing but pornography and smut, and I should seek medical help.
 
8 out of 10 actually *P* darling, I was disapointed, I wanted to be a pervert.:devil:
 
Perdita, I ignore no-one.

Similarly I like to be ignored by no-one, but I know life's not like that.

Everybody is entitled to their say, whether I like what they have to say or not. Similarly I'm entitled to my response.

If SF was truly being sarcastic, intended in a humorous way, then all she has to do is say, and I'll step back from my stance.

I'll even apologise for any offence I've caused.

As for posting to her, when I believe she's either not talking to me or she has me on ignore, that's simply because I can.

If she chooses to ignore me, in any way, that is her choice and she's entitled to it.

I choose to speak, to everybody!

Even those I don't much like or who don't like me, in the hope that some common ground might be found. After all, no matter what our differences, we WILL have SOMETHING in common.
 
Last edited:
Interesting answer, Lewd; I'm glad I asked. Thanks. - P.
------

Pops, you'll always be a perv to me. :kiss:
 
lewdandlicentious said:
Oh Svennie for fucks sake get a grip will you?

Of course artists do it for the money!!

Why else do they put their stuff on display?? If they didn't want the bucks, they'd keep their stuff private.

"For the love of it??" Give me a break! They wanna be rich like all the rest of us!

And what you're also saying is, any feedback they don't like, get's deleted!

Oh right, that'll give them a good rounded view of how their stuff is seen won't it???

"You don't like my stuff, you say bad things about it, so I don't want to hear what you've got to say, wah, wah wah!!!"


Sometimes some of you people need a fucking shake!

Oh, and the very word "amateur" means doing it for the joy, for free!

Oh and another thing, as for the "art v porn" thing, surely it's in the eye of the beholder. What's pleasing to one, may not be so to another. Likewise with thoughts of what's artistic and ponographic.

Again though, as the test suggests, we have people, so called "experts" telling us what is what, and we're supposed to pat ourselves on the back for agreeing with them????

What a load of bollocks.

I don't think I need a "fucking shake", but I sure could do with a shaking fuck...:cool:

As for the intention of my post, well, I can ofcourse only speak for myself. If I wanted to make money for all the effort I put into my stories, I'd post them somewhere else. But I like Lit, I like having my work read by thousands of people, and I like getting feedback saying "we love reading your novels and acting them out in bed". The only feedback I delete is the ones going along the line of "you nigger-loving whore".

No offense taken for the harsh tone, Lewd Dandelion. I too get cranky at that time of the month.
 
Hmmm....

Wonder if I can start an argument.

Hypothesis:

All artwork of a visual nature is designed to be voyeuristic in nature. Ergo, all visual artwork is porn....


Except for Rhino's work, which is the ultimate in por...er....art....


:D
 
The_Fool said:
Hmmm....

Wonder if I can start an argument.

Hypothesis:

All artwork of a visual nature is designed to be voyeuristic in nature. Ergo, all visual artwork is porn....


Except for Rhino's work, which is the ultimate in por...er....art....


:D

Hahaha!!!

I wonder if this argument will take hold? I'm gonna sit back and take notes. ;)

Lou :kiss:
 
Back
Top