Quiz again

8/10

Pretty good; it seems you know your JavaBeans from your fava beans, your slashers from your slashdotters.

I think I should get half credit for the programmer who was also a serial killer. :D
 
6/10
sigh, thought i would do better at it than that...
embarrassed that im a programmer and i missed some ...*sigh*
 
I got nine of ten. They said my liver was safe. Thing is, who hasn't seen some of these faces? Berkowitz, for instance.
 
vella_ms said:
6/10
sigh, thought i would do better at it than that...
embarrassed that im a programmer and i missed some ...*sigh*

*pats Vella-la-la on the head*

There, there. I understand, sweets. I thought I'd get all the serial killers right....
 
minsue said:
*pats Vella-la-la on the head*

There, there. I understand, sweets. I thought I'd get all the serial killers right....

*CHUCKLE* :) Haven't taken it yet.
 
I got 9 out of 10. Aparently I can spot Hannibal Lechter at a programming conference and save everyone's livers. ;)
 
Good boy. It's in the calluses on the fingers, eh, Holmes?
 
7/10. And didn't recognize a single one. Just goes to show that there is a knack to understanding t/f quizzes.

Shanglan
 
4 out of 10.
Of course, I haven't had the best experiences with folks who know how to do any computer programming of any sort, so perhaps they just all look crazy to me.
And some of the pictures looked really, really old, which was a bit misleading.
 
9/10 "You'd spot Hannibal Lector in seconds at an Open Source conference. Your liver is safe."

Is it sad that I recognised a lot of those people, and even knew about four of their names, before they came up? (The killers, that is, not the coders - I'm not that sad.)

Lou :eek:
 
Tatelou said:
9/10 "You'd spot Hannibal Lector in seconds at an Open Source conference. Your liver is safe."

Is it sad that I recognised a lot of those people, and even knew about four of their names, before they came up? (The killers, that is, not the coders - I'm not that sad.)

Lou :eek:

Coo... I do worry about you!

9/10 missed the guy from Rillington Place... well not actually miss him.

Pstt Lou - ya bums showing.;)
 
Tatelou said:
9/10 "You'd spot Hannibal Lector in seconds at an Open Source conference. Your liver is safe."

Is it sad that I recognised a lot of those people, and even knew about four of their names, before they came up? (The killers, that is, not the coders - I'm not that sad.)

Lou :eek:

Oooops. I guess I am. ;)
 
neonlyte said:
Coo... I do worry about you!

9/10 missed the guy from Rillington Place... well not actually miss him.

Pstt Lou - ya bums showing.;)

Good. You should. :D

I didn't miss him, well I did, but yeah. I thought someone else was a cold-blooded killer, and all the bloke ever did was invent a programming language. If it was a crap one, well, yeah, maybe the same thing.

:eek: Is it? Shit! Thanks for telling me. I'll yank my skirt down. ;)
 
I did your sense thing, but it had less to do with senses than physiology and the controls baffled me a couple times. I'm never any good with interfaces.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Sensory Challenge

This was a lot of fun. I knew how most of the visual perception ones worked, but blew them anyway. I'm that bad at that.

13/20 - a sensitive soul, they say. I dunno bout that, I'm pissed at myself for some of the ones I missed. :rolleyes: :D
 
minsue said:
13/20 - a sensitive soul, they say. I dunno bout that, I'm pissed at myself for some of the ones I missed. :rolleyes: :D

Beats me. I think I got a 7. Although I have issues with the taste one.
 
BlackShanglan said:
Sensory Challenge

This was a lot of fun. I knew how most of the visual perception ones worked, but blew them anyway. I'm that bad at that.
I got 8/20 but reading the explanation on a few took more time than the actual test.:rolleyes:
 
8/10 for the pshyco/programer. (Is that the same thing?)

11/20 on the sensory. (I may have issues... but everyone here already knew that.)
 
Last edited:
7/10 on the coder/serial killer thing. The only one I recognized was Berkowitz.

Off to try the other one now...
 
17/20 for the sensory one. Very sensitive, apparently. Over-sensitive, perhaps? Who'da thunk it? ;)

Thanks, Shang, interesting stuff.
 
Back
Top