Queersetti is a sniveling coward with no credibility

Re: easily done.

LovingTongue said:
"But you expect gays to just take any shit that's thrown and us and keep quiet." - Queersetti

That's called homophobia, dumbass.

But you do seem to have an irrational fear about homosexuals being superior to you. That's why you've attacked Q for presenting a legitimate study about pay, and bringing up the whole "superiority" thing when Q hadn't. Now that's homophobia ... or at least a part of your symptoms related to schizophrenia.
 
Re: easily done.

LovingTongue said:
"But you expect gays to just take any shit that's thrown and us and keep quiet." - Queersetti

That's called homophobia, dumbass.

I presented your very own words where you did say just what Q claimed. Now you're the one calling it homophobia. You continue to show your delusions of persecution quite blatantly. It's clearly one of your paranoid-type symptoms of schizophrenia.
 
LovingTongue said:
Any time someone lies about you it affects your life... especially about something as serious as homophobia.


:rolleyes:

People believe Queersetti even when he's clearly lying. Does that explain things better to you?

So, I guess I do have credibility after all.:D
 
Re: easily done.

LovingTongue said:
"But you expect gays to just take any shit that's thrown and us and keep quiet." - Queersetti

That's called homophobia, dumbass.


No, that's hypocrisy.

Really, pumpkin, I think I am a little bit more attuned to detecting homophobia than you are.

I'll ask again, if I don't think you are a homophobe, as I have said over and over again, why do you want so badly to convince me that I do?
 
Queersetti said:
So, I guess I do have credibility after all.:D
People - mostly Republicans - believe Bush.

Does that mean he has credibility?

And if you don't think "telling gays to shut up about homophobia" is not homophobia, then you have a far bigger cognitive problem than I am capable of fixing.
 
LovingTongue said:
People - mostly Republicans - believe Bush.

Does that mean he has credibility?

And if you don't think "telling gays to shut up about homophobia" is not homophobia, then you have a far bigger cognitive problem than I am capable of fixing.


In fact, many homosexuals might themselves advise others to shut up about homophobia, out of fear that rising the issue may do more harm than good. I would hardly consider them homophobes for taking that stance.

But what do they know, compared to you?Please, by all means, enlighten me about homophobia. Share your expertise with me, oh wise one.
 
Queersetti said:
In fact, many homosexuals might themselves advise others to shut up about homophobia, out of fear that rising the issue may do more harm than good. I would hardly consider them homophobes for taking that stance.

But what do they know, compared to you?Please, by all means, enlighten me about homophobia. Share your expertise with me, oh wise one.
First, you must conquer Reading Comprehension 101 before getting to the definition of homophobia.

Once again. What I flamed you about was claiming gays were superior to heteros. That is not the same as telling you to shut up about homophobia.
 
I see it clearly now.

Only LovingTongue is allowed to claim superiority.
 
LovingTongue said:
First, you must conquer Reading Comprehension 101 before getting to the definition of homophobia.

Once again. What I flamed you about was claiming gays were superior to heteros. That is not the same as telling you to shut up about homophobia.


Where did I say gays were superior to straights?

Quote and link, please.

Wow, deja vu.
 
Queersetti said:
Where did I say gays were superior to straights?
When you claimed gays make more money than straights, that's when.

You're the standing uber champion of discrimination.
 
Oh yes and this fits Quaky to a T:

bigot: (n) One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.
 
LovingTongue said:
Oh yes and this fits Quaky to a T:

bigot: (n) One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

But that would fit you too since you are intolerant of those who don't agree with your politics.
 
Queersetti said:
Where did I say gays were superior to straights?

Quote and link, please.

Wow, deja vu.


gays are superior to straights ... we're be surpreme rulers of the world by the end of the century

i'm just saying what he wants to hear
 
sexy-girl said:
gays are superior to straights ... we're be surpreme rulers of the world by the end of the century

i'm just saying what he wants to hear

It doesn't matter how you say it. He'll read it how he wants anyways. *shrugs*
 
LovingTongue said:
When you claimed gays make more money than straights, that's when.

You're the standing uber champion of discrimination.


I don't regard people as superior or inferior based on their income. That is your standard, not mine.
 
Queersetti said:
I don't regard people as superior or inferior based on their income. That is your standard, not mine.

LT has no income so I'm assuming there is some sort of inverse relationship....

No wait, there are the dimes he gets for every blow job his mom gives down at the truck stop. He's made at least $13 this week alone. Big black mama is going to suck her way into the next tax bracket!!!
 
Queersetti said:
I don't regard people as superior or inferior based on their income. That is your standard, not mine.
Liar.
You wouldn't have bragged about those bogus stats if you weren't trying to prove some "we're better than you" point.
 
WARMACHINE said:
LT has no income so I'm assuming there is some sort of inverse relationship....

No wait, there are the dimes he gets for every blow job his mom gives down at the truck stop. He's made at least $13 this week alone. Big black mama is going to suck her way into the next tax bracket!!!
I'm buying a house based on the penny I make for every time I dump a load of sperm into your wife.
 
Back
Top