Queersetti is a sniveling coward with no credibility

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidet

By citing the study and standing behind it, its flawed logic becomes yours.

Let me put this in a way you as a woman can relate to.

Suppose I posted an article saying and purporting to prove that women are not as smart as men. I keep pushing this article as the gospel truth. Does its own bigotry and error not thus become mine by right of the fact that I am defending it?

But what if the study was right?

 

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidet

There have been studies done proving out the difference in men and women. I don't get offended because I don't see men and women as being the same.

Loving Tongue wants all the sneetches to have stars on their bellies.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Shit I brought up?

You started the thread with my name in it, asshole.

Oh I'm sorry, Q.

It must have been because of that remark you made accusing me of wanting gays to shut up about homophoia.

My bad.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind g

There have been studies done proving out the difference in men and women. I don't get offended because I don't see men and women as being the same.

But that isn't the answer to my question.

Suppose I posted an article saying and purporting to prove that women are not as smart as men. I keep pushing this article as the gospel truth. Does its own bigotry and error not thus become mine by right of the fact that I am defending it?

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Shit I brought up?

You started the thread with my name in it, asshole.

By accusing me of this behavior IN A THREAD PREVIOUS TO THIS, you're the one bringing up shit from the past that has already been resolved. But will you call that obsession? Oh no, not you, because we all know Queersetti never makes mistakes.

Dumbass.

 

[Queersetti]

Oh I'm sorry, Q.

It must have been because of that remark you made accusing me of wanting gays to shut up about homophoia.

My bad.

So you thought a whole separate thread intended to browbeat me into shutting up would prove your point?

 

[Queersetti]

By accusing me of this behavior IN A THREAD PREVIOUS TO THIS, you're the one bringing up shit from the past that has already been resolved. But will you call that obsession? Oh no, not you, because we all know Queersetti never makes mistakes.

Dumbass.

Does that vein in your temple throb more when you type in all caps?

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Does that vein in your temple throb more when you type in all caps?

It was a futile gesture to get you to address a certain fact that is contrary to your twisted line of reasoning.

 

[Freya]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind g

But that isn't the answer to my question.

Suppose I posted an article saying and purporting to prove that women are not as smart as men. I keep pushing this article as the gospel truth. Does its own bigotry and error not thus become mine by right of the fact that I am defending it?

A valid study proving out a fact favouring one sex over another is not bigoted. So were you to stand behind it, it would also not make you bigoted. Making that same claim without proof to back you up, does.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

For Queersett's comprehensional benefit:

By accusing me of this behavior in a thread previous to this, you're the one bringing up shit from the past that has already been resolved. But will you call that obsession? Oh no, not you, because we all know Queersetti never makes mistakes.

Dumbass.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti'

A valid study proving out a fact favouring one sex over another is not bigoted. So were you to stand behind it, it would also not make you bigoted.

But everyone already knows that kind of study would be bogus.

 

[Freya]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti'

But everyone already knows that kind of study would be bogus.

No, everyone doesn't know that. You think it will because you're convinced that everyone should remain equal, regardless of sex, race, sexual preference. There have been studies done showing, if not differences in intelligence levels between sexes, at least the difference in manners of thinking...ie: who's more logical, more practical, more likely to ask for directions, more nurturing, etc. These are fair comparisons, simply because men and women are NOT the same, not even close.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Que

No, everyone doesn't know that. You think it will because you're convinced that everyone should remain equal, regardless of sex, race, sexual preference. There have been studies done showing, if not differences in intelligence levels between sexes, at least the difference in manners of thinking...ie: who's more logical, more practical, more likely to ask for directions, more nurturing, etc. These are fair comparisons, simply because men and women are NOT the same, not even close.

LOL

Those studies are bogus, but I doubt that is going to stop you from believing these things.

Has it ever occurred to you that those inequalities are pushed and "verified by studies" ( ) for no other purpose but to pigeonhole people and exclude certain groups of people from certain things - such as excluding women from the military, or throwing away female applicants' resumes when they apply for work at one of several now defunct tech companies I used to work for?

Jeez... I see I have a long task ahead of me in bringing people up to speed with history...

 

[Pookie]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidet

But what if the study was right?

And what if the study was done by a straight person, which it could've been for all I know? Kinda throws a monkey wrench in LT's "logic", huh?

 

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Que

LOL

Those studies are bogus, but I doubt that is going to stop you from believing these things.

Has it ever occurred to you that those inequalities are pushed and "verified by studies" ( ) for no other purpose but to pigeonhole people and exclude certain groups of people from certain things - such as excluding women from the military, or throwing away female applicants' resumes when they apply for work at one of several now defunct tech companies I used to work for?

Jeez... I see I have a long task ahead of me in bringing people up to speed with history...

It's all a big conspiracy, and only you can see the truth.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And s

It's all a big conspiracy, and only you can see the truth.

Queersetti logic once again:

"LT flames Q.
Q is gay
LT must thus hate gays."

 

[Le Jacquelope]

So you thought a whole separate thread intended to browbeat me into shutting up would prove your point?

You're such a retard, Quacky.
This is about you lying about me, not shutting you up about homophobia.

I keep wondering what your problem is and it just became clear to me. Your head is so dense that even the Death Star can't penetrate it, much less a sliver of reasoning. That solid neutronium ain't the case you're building here, Quacky.. it's your skull.

 

[Pookie]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And s

Queersetti logic once again:

"LT flames Q.
Q embarrasses LT .
LT is an idiot for flaming Q."

Fixed.

 

[Queersetti]

This coming from someone who thinks everyone else on Lit is racist? Okaaay...

*leaves thread*

To be fair, he didn't say that everyone else on Lit was a racist, he just said that everyone on the General Board was a racist.

"I have no feelings at all for this racist, war mongering General Board.

You're a bunch of scumbags."



https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=7946214

 

[Queersetti]

You're such a retard, Quacky.
This is about you lying about me, not shutting you up about homophobia.

I keep wondering what your problem is and it just became clear to me. Your head is so dense that even the Death Star can't penetrate it, much less a sliver of reasoning. That solid neutronium ain't the case you're building here, Quacky.. it's your skull.

The Death Star?

What a nerdy reference. You gonna put your phasers on stun next, fanboy?

 

[Le Jacquelope]

The Death Star?

What a nerdy reference. You gonna put your phasers on stun next, fanboy?

I also like Urkel, I watch DBZ and Babylon 5.

Oh yeah and I love fae art and hang out on a porn board.

ROTFLMAO
I couldn't have imagined I'd live long enough to see a homosexual man rake a nerd over the coals for not being normal. I bet you'll never get the irony of that, will ya?
what's the wager Q will go back to screaming homophobia again?

 

[phrodeau]

Neutronium isn't a solid.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Neutronium isn't a solid.

It's a liquid. But try penetrating it sometime.

 

[Queersetti]

I also like Urkel, I watch DBZ and Babylon 5.

Oh yeah and I love fae art and hang out on a porn board.

ROTFLMAO
I couldn't have imagined I'd live long enough to see a homosexual man rake a nerd over the coals for not being normal. I bet you'll never get the irony of that, will ya?
what's the wager Q will go back to screaming homophobia again?

I'd rather be a fag than a dork.

 

[Pookie]

I'd rather be a fag than a dork.

*gigglesnort*