Queersetti is a sniveling coward with no credibility

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

For the umpteenth time, I have said you are a hypocrite. I have said you are mentally deficient. But I have not said that you are a homophobe.

You have accused me of wanting gays to shut up about homophobia. WTF is that, then?

 

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

You have accused me of wanting gays to shut up about homophobia. WTF is that, then?

I don't believe your discomfort with gays defending themselves springs from homophobia, I think it comes from your overall objection to any expression of group identification.

 

[John Doe]

LT, FFS, man, are you still going on about this? Don't get me wrong, the sweet, sweet irony of a someone with (at the very least) arguably questionable credibility attacking the credibility of someone else is not lost on me and indeed I found quite amusing, it has lost its appeal from sheer persistence to exist.

In short, I implore you from the heart of my bottom...

SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!

That is all.

 

[Queersetti]

Quacky, you're a fucking moron.

Quacky logic sez:
"LT accused Queersetti of being paranoid for calling him a homophobe

Queersetti is a gay man

Therefore LT has stated that he believes gays who think they see homophobia on Lit are paranoid."

Very interesting...


Really, how have I "changed the rules" for my own identity group?

"LT accused Queersetti of being paranoid for calling him a homophobe"

If anyone could parse that sentence for me and explain what it means, I would appreciate it.

I wasn't even referring to any statement you made to me, I was referring to your post in the thread I previously linked, in which you claimed Glamorilla was paranoid for thinking there was homophobia on Lit.

As for your identity group, I realize that it must be hard to keep your many Lit feuds straight, but this particular one was based in your objection to my pointing out that you denounced people as racist for not attacking racist posters, but that you, yourself, had been equally guilty of ignoring posts attacking gays. That constitutes an obvious double standard, hence, my charge that you are a hypocrite. My other charge, that you are mentally unbalanced, needs no more proof than whatever non sequiter you choose to make in response to this post.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

I don't believe your discomfort with gays defending themselves springs from homophobia, I think it comes from your overall objection to any expression of group identification.

If this is true you have still failed to show where I am opposed to anyone - gay or not - speaking out against homophobia.

Once again, responding to homophobes by saying "gays earn more than straights" is no less stupid than responding to white supremacists by saying "blacks are better athletes than whites". You don't fight bigotry - aka "their group is better than yours" - by saying your group is better than theirs at xxx or yyy. Jesus H Christ on a Harley, people, where the hell were you raised? In a forest by wolves?

Does anyone see the hilarity of this?
Black guy: "I'm black and my people are better athletes, you weaklings!"
White guy: "I'm white and my people are smarter at science, you retards!"
Black guy: "Yeah, well I'm a Nobel Prize winning molecular biologist, what about you?"
White guy: "Oh yeah? I'm a Gold Medalist in the 100 yard sprint!"

Feel free to substitute gay vs straight person in there if the irony of this doesn't grab ya outright.

Oh wait...I think I get it... you must think the only way to combat bigotry is to find some way to show that your group is better than theirs...

 

[Le Jacquelope]

"LT accused Queersetti of being paranoid for calling him a homophobe"

If anyone could parse that sentence for me and explain what it means, I would appreciate it.

I wasn't even referring to any statement you made to me, I was referring to your post in the thread I previously linked, in which you claimed Glamorilla was paranoid for thinking there was homophobia on Lit.

As for your identity group, I realize that it must be hard to keep your many Lit feuds straight, but this particular one was based in your objection to my pointing out that you denounced people as racist for not attacking racist posters, but that you, yourself, had been equally guilty of ignoring posts attacking gays. That constitutes an obvious double standard, hence, my charge that you are a hypocrite. My other charge, that you are mentally unbalanced, needs no more proof than whatever non sequiter you choose to make in response to this post.

I apologized to Glamorilla after seeing Killswitch in action, didn't I?

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Stuponfucious - make me shut up, asshole.

I'm not going to stop until I get a fucking retraction about that claim that I want gays to shut up about homophobia.

I'll fight this for years if I have to, and I'm not kidding.

 

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

If this is true you have still failed to show where I am opposed to anyone - gay or not - speaking out against homophobia.

Once again, responding to homophobes by saying "gays earn more than straights" is no less stupid than responding to white supremacists by saying "blacks are better athletes than whites". You don't fight bigotry - aka "their group is better than yours" - by saying your group is better than theirs at xxx or yyy. Jesus H Christ on a Harley, people, where the hell were you raised? In a forest by wolves?

Does anyone see the hilarity of this?
Black guy: "I'm black and my people are better athletes, you weaklings!"
White guy: "I'm white and my people are smarter at science, you retards!"
Black guy: "Yeah, well I'm a Nobel Prize winning molecular biologist, what about you?"
White guy: "Oh yeah? I'm a Gold Medalist in the 100 yard sprint!"

Feel free to substitute gay vs straight person in there if the irony of this doesn't grab ya outright.

Oh wait...I think I get it... you must think the only way to combat bigotry is to find some way to show that your group is better than theirs...

The truth is not dependent on your personal agenda. If gays as a group make more money than straights, then they do. Period.

If 70% (or whatever number) of NBA players are black, then they are. Period

Reality will not change for your convenience. Your steadfast belief that it will is a symptom of mental illness, and I hope you will seek help.

 

[Queersetti]

Stuponfucious - make me shut up, asshole.

I'm not going to stop until I get a fucking retraction about that claim that I want gays to shut up about homophobia.

I'll fight this for years if I have to, and I'm not kidding.

Do you really think you have that much time before they come and throw a net over you?

 

[John Doe]

...I'll fight this for years if I have to, and I'm not kidding.

I'm sure you will. The sad thing is, you think that says something good about you.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I'm sure you will. The sad thing is, you think that says something good about you.

As long as in the end I do not have the reputation of being a homophobe or being opposed to gays standing up for their rights and equality, it's all good.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

The truth is not dependent on your personal agenda. If gays as a group make more money than straights, then they do. Period.

If 70% (or whatever number) of NBA players are black, then they are. Period

And if the next year 70% of NBA players are white, then what?

Reality will not change for your convenience. Your steadfast belief that it will is a symptom of mental illness, and I hope you will seek help.

Mental illness: Anyone who disagrees with Queersetti

 

[John Doe]

As long as in the end I do not have the reputation of being a homophobe or being opposed to gays standing up for their rights and equality, it's all good.

This coming from someone who thinks everyone else on Lit is racist? Okaaay...

*leaves thread*

 

[Freya]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

And if the next year 70% of NBA players are white, then what?

Then there'll be 70% of NBA players who are white. Stating it won't mean that whites are superior to blacks as a race...just that there's presently more of them.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

This coming from someone who thinks everyone else on Lit is racist? Okaaay...

*leaves thread*

I never said that, you retard.

 

[Queersetti]

I apologized to Glamorilla after seeing Killswitch in action, didn't I?

So you want credit for apologizing for behavior that you claim you never engaged in?

 

[Queersetti]

As long as in the end I do not have the reputation of being a homophobe or being opposed to gays standing up for their rights and equality, it's all good.

Then you say "I apologize if I have posted anything that gave the impression that I was dismissive of gays or their right to stand up against discrimination. It is not superiorist for them to be proud of themselves and other gays.", and the whole issue disappears, allowing you more time to travel around the country, stalking other people who have insulted you on the internet.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

Then there'll be 70% of NBA players who are white. Stating it won't mean that whites are superior to blacks as a race...just that there's presently more of them.

*smacks head*
Oh for Christ's sake....

When Queersetti was saying gays earn more than heteros, he was implying an inherent trait that is as reliable as saying college grads earn more than high school dropouts. He is wrong in implying that.

 

[Freya]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

*smacks head*
Oh for Christ's sake....

When Queersetti was saying gays earn more than heteros, he was implying an inherent trait that is as reliable as saying college grads earn more than high school dropouts. He is wrong in implying that.

*smacks head*
Oh for Christ's sake...

Queersetti wasn't "saying" anything of the sort. The study was.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Then you say "I apologize if I have posted anything that gave the impression that I was dismissive of gays or their right to stand up against discrimination. It is not superiorist for them to be proud of themselves and other gays.", and the whole issue disappears, allowing you more time to travel around the country, stalking other people who have insulted you on the internet.

But I apologized to Glam a long time ago in public for that because I did not see any homophobic crap on Lit until Killswitch jumped into it.

Dipshit.

By accusing me of this behavior you're the one bringing up shit from the past that has already been resolved. But will you call that obsession? Oh no, not you, because we all know Queersetti never makes mistakes.

 

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

And if the next year 70% of NBA players are white, then what?


Mental illness: Anyone who disagrees with Queersetti

This is the point; there is no "then what?". Objective reality exists, despite your inability to locate it.

And I have to point out that many people on Lit disagree with me on many issues, but you are the only one who is demonstrably insane.

 

[Queersetti]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidetracked

*smacks head*
Oh for Christ's sake....

When Queersetti was saying gays earn more than heteros, he was implying an inherent trait that is as reliable as saying college grads earn more than high school dropouts. He is wrong in implying that.

Income levels are a societal factor, not an inherent trait, nitwit.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidet

*smacks head*
Oh for Christ's sake...

Queersetti wasn't "saying" anything of the sort. The study was.

By citing the study and standing behind it, its flawed logic becomes yours.

Let me put this in a way you as a woman can relate to.

Suppose I posted an article saying and purporting to prove that women are not as smart as men. I keep pushing this article as the gospel truth. Does its own bigotry and error not thus become mine by right of the fact that I am defending it?

 

[Freya]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And since Queersetti's mind got sidet

By citing the study and standing behind it, its flawed logic becomes yours.

Let me put this in a way you as a woman can relate to.

Suppose I posted an article saying and purporting to prove that women are not as smart as men. I keep pushing this article as the gospel truth. Does its own bigotry and error not thus become mine by right of the fact that I am defending it?

There have been studies done proving out the difference in men and women. I don't get offended because I don't see men and women as being the same.

 

[Queersetti]

But I apologized to Glam a long time ago in public for that because I did not see any homophobic crap on Lit until Killswitch jumped into it.

Dipshit.

By accusing me of this behavior you're the one bringing up shit from the past that has already been resolved. But will you call that obsession? Oh no, not you, because we all know Queersetti never makes mistakes.

Shit I brought up?

You started the thread with my name in it, asshole.