Queersetti is a sniveling coward with no credibility

[Byron In Exile]

so the answer is "no I have no awards because I cant write worth shit and I even have trouble reading the ingredients of a cereal box. Where is my razor?"

Don't be so quick to blame your not having awards on your shitty writing.

There might be other reasons.

 

[Debbie]

I never said I was the most talented writer or that my stories are the best. I have never seen your stories so I'll reserve judgment for now. How do you know that I wont be published? Why do you call that bullshit? I posted rough drafts, not polished material. Get a clue before commenting on the style of others.
Any other comments about my writing that I should actually take into account?

You posted rough drafts here on the GB or submitted rough drafts to lit?

I was mortified the other day when I reread an old poem I had submitted and hadn't picked up on a blatant typo.

 

[Guest]

You posted rough drafts here on the GB or submitted rough drafts to lit?

I sent 2 to Lit, posted 3+ poems on the other forum.
I see BIE cant answer my question. Another one goes to iggy.
A conversation w/ him is like having a colonoscopy.

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.hosstyle.com/Goofy%20shit/images/grabass.jpg

Oh, wrong thread.

Still the best part of this thread.

Damn nice.

 

[Byron In Exile]

I see BIE cant answer my question. Another one goes to iggy.

I'm looking forward to proudly sporting my new "I made it to Scott X's Ignore List" T-shirt.

A conversation w/ him is like having a colonoscopy.

The bleeding should resolve in a couple of days.

 

[Debbie]

I'm looking forward to proudly sporting my new "I made it to Scott X's Ignore List" T-shirt. The bleeding should resolve in a couple of days.

Just so scott can see it.

 

[John Doe]

Hmm, intriguing...is there a story behind that and if so, may we hear it?

Hehe.. no story, just confirming your suspicions... that's all.

Damn.

 

[Tungwagger]

Shhhhhh...


I'm waiting for LT to astound us with his rapier-like wit and well thought out analysis.


Where the hell is LT anyway?

 

[phrodeau]

He's moving this week.

Property values are in flux.

 

[Byron In Exile]

Just so scott can see it.

lol

 

[Tungwagger]

There is ONE thing that LT does well:


He can single handedly cause both Left Wingers, Right Wingers, Libertarians, and those all over the political spectrum to unite in the same cause.


Thinking he's an idiot.....

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I just love this comment.

Here you are, up in arms because you say Queersetti accused you of being a homophobe............. yet you run around this board accusing me of being a racist!

What right do you have to become upset with allegedly false accusations being made against you, when you lay them against me repeatedly?

It's Karma baby.... you're just getting a taste of your own medicine, and it's bitter... isn't it.

Your actions speak very loudly, Ladybird. You stand up for racists every time I call them on it.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

The context of your remarks is that you have consistently defined any statements by gays in support of our own rights as "superiorist".

You're in total error again.
I only said stereotyping heterosexuals as inferior is a crappy way to fight homophobia. I've never said anything more than that.

You acted like Tortured Lite and got called on it.

I am not going to debate this with you. You are not capable of maintaining a rational discussion, as most people here know. You can't damage my credibility, as you have none yourself. And in any regard, anyone who would base their opinion of me on your ludicrous rantings is not someone whose opinion I would value or respect.

Oh stuff it dumbass. You're a liar, and you know it.

You posted something by me that condemned your heterophobic remarks, not your war against homophobia.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

BTW, although we've disagreed before and probably will again, LT is beyond all that. He nurtures a hatred for the site itself.

Wrong again.

 

[Queersetti]

You're in total error again.
I only said stereotyping heterosexuals as inferior is a crappy way to fight homophobia. I've never said anything more than that.

You acted like Tortured Lite and got called on it.


Oh stuff it dumbass. You're a liar, and you know it.

You posted something by me that condemned your heterophobic remarks, not your war against homophobia.

Post a link to any remarks I made that are "heterophobic".

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Post a link to any remarks I made that are "heterophobic".

Before I hop to it let me start with the claim you and glamorilla made that gays have better jobs than hetero men.

As in, the thread from which you quoted that alleged post of mine that chided you for protesting homophobia

 

[Queersetti]

Before I hop to it let me start with the claim you and glamorilla made that gays have better jobs than hetero men.

As in, the thread from which you quoted that alleged post of mine that chided you for protesting homophobia

You truly are an idiot.

I quoted a study that claimed that gay males on average, have a higher income than straight males.

That study may or may not be correct, you offered no factual rebuttal, only an emotional outburst in response. Quoting the report is no more "heterophobic" than a statement that the Yankees beat the Red Sox last night is "Bostonophobic".

You are such a clueless moron that the mind reels as trying to appreciate the depths of your inanity. You accept no evidence that is presented to you, but you make no effort to rebut it, either. You believe that whatever half baked idea bubbles semi-coherently to the surface of what one can charitably call your mind is infallible wisdom, as if you had hauled it down from Mount Sinai. Granted, the granite like consistency of your brain may be an understandable cause for some confusion in that regard, but I assure you, such a notion is false.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

You truly are an idiot.

I quoted a study that claimed that gay males on average, have a higher income than straight males.

That study may or may not be correct, you offered no factual rebuttal, only an emotional outburst in response. Quoting the report is no more "heterophobic" than a statement that the Yankees beat the Red Sox last night is "Bostonophobic".

"Hetero whites, statistically, have fewer incidents of AIDS than gays" would be considered bigoted. So is what you would say.

Well, except, of course, on planet Q.

You are such a clueless moron that the mind reels as trying to appreciate the depths of your inanity. You accept no evidence that is presented to you, but you make no effort to rebut it, either.

You call that evidence? I can find books that claim the Egyptians invented airplanes, to prove Africans were superior to whites, and that would be equally as credible as the stuff you posted about gays doing better than heterosexuals in the workplace.

You tried to pass yourself off as being better than non-gays and the whole effort backfired on you because someone had the guts to call you on it.

You believe that whatever half baked idea bubbles semi-coherently to the surface of what one can charitably call your mind is infallible wisdom, as if you had hauled it down from Mount Sinai. Granted, the granite like consistency of your brain may be an understandable cause for some confusion in that regard, but I assure you, such a notion is false.

Look, spineless man, you accused me of attacking you for speaking out against homophobia, and you're clearly wrong. The supposed evidence you posted showed no example of me attacking you for fighting homophobia, but it did show me attacking you for taking a superiorist attitude. You'd be eating crow if it weren't for the fact that they're already feasting on all that damned straw packed into your head.

 

[Queersetti]

"Hetero whites, statistically, have fewer incidents of AIDS than gays" would be considered bigoted. So is what you would say.

Well, except, of course, on planet Q.


You call that evidence? I can find books that claim the Egyptians invented airplanes, to prove Africans were superior to whites, and that would be equally as credible as the stuff you posted about gays doing better than heterosexuals in the workplace.

You tried to pass yourself off as being better than non-gays and the whole effort backfired on you because someone had the guts to call you on it.


Look, spineless man, you accused me of attacking you for speaking out against homophobia, and you're clearly wrong. The supposed evidence you posted showed no example of me attacking you for fighting homophobia, but it did show me attacking you for taking a superiorist attitude. You'd be eating crow if it weren't for the fact that they're already feasting on all that damned straw packed into your head.

You're a lunatic.

The subtle change from attacking me for statements I allegedly made but that you can not substantiate, to attacking me for my 'attitude" is duly noted.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

You're a lunatic.

The subtle change from attacking me for statements I allegedly made but that you can not substantiate, to attacking me for my 'attitude" is duly noted.

You spineless fuckhead. Who taught you how to read? Beavis and Butthead?

I'm attacking your baseless statements about gays "doing better" than straights. You were busted for trying to act superior just like the homophobes do. You've also been busted for accusing me of attacking you for fighting homophobia and trying to "shut you up".

When you reach adulthood you'll realize that fighting homophobia and claiming you are superior to heterosexuals is not in any way the same fucking thing.

Oh yeah and your attitude stinks, too.

 

[Queersetti]

You spineless fuckhead. Who taught you how to read? Beavis and Butthead?

I'm attacking your baseless statements about gays "doing better" than straights. You were busted for trying to act superior just like the homophobes do. You've also been busted for accusing me of attacking you for fighting homophobia and trying to "shut you up".

When you reach adulthood you'll realize that fighting homophobia and claiming you are superior to heterosexuals is not in any way the same fucking thing.

Oh yeah and your attitude stinks, too.

But I'm not claiming to be superior to all heterosexuals, honey, I am just claiming to be superior to you.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I like Q and he has a lot of credibilty with me.

He lied when he said I tried to shut him and his anti-homophobia cause up.

Now he won't apologize even though he has no evidence to back up his claims.

Is that credibility?

Oh blah, I don't expect any straight answers from anyone about that...

 

[Le Jacquelope]

But I'm not claiming to be superior to all heterosexuals, honey, I am just claiming to be superior to you.

Liar again.
You posted that gays were, in general, superior to heterosexuals.

Now you are accusing me of wanting gays to shut up about homophobia.

You were wrong twice, and now you're wrong three times.

Keep it up Quack.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

so the answer is "no I have no awards because I cant write worth shit and I even have trouble reading the ingredients of a cereal box. Where is my razor?"

Where are your awards again?

 

[Freya]

You are such a clueless moron that the mind reels as trying to appreciate the depths of your inanity. You accept no evidence that is presented to you, but you make no effort to rebut it, either. You believe that whatever half baked idea bubbles semi-coherently to the surface of what one can charitably call your mind is infallible wisdom, as if you had hauled it down from Mount Sinai. Granted, the granite like consistency of your brain may be an understandable cause for some confusion in that regard, but I assure you, such a notion is false.

I have no idea what this thread is about, but this ^^^^ is just fucking beautiful.