Public Humiliation let's hear your stories

rosco rathbone said:
I think if I was going to fantasize about a super-advanced AI, I would just imagine one powerful enough to send me into a virtual reality realm where my word was law.....

Over the human chicks?

I guess if it was like, HDTV quality VR...
 
Don't listen to them patchdog, I believe you!

She probably wears camouflage body paint or something y'all.

DUH!!
 
Mine I do believe was with my first Master when I was 18.

He had me meet him at this club (he was a mega sadist and out of control on narcotics...) and this big brute of a bouncer type dude brings me to this room. He blindfolds me and tells me just to wait. Master comes in and cuts my clothes off and says I'm to entertain his friends. He straps me down to this table and next thing I know I feel hands all over me, things in me like I was a science experiment.

I don't know how many of them there were, but it was a pretty bad situation. I could barely move afterwards. But the humiliation came from being used over and over with little regard for me as person just as property. Was pretty interesting.
 
Marquis said:
Don't listen to them patchdog, I believe you!

She probably wears camouflage body paint or something y'all.

DUH!!



riiiiiiiight.... because being camoflauged and being able to walk safely knowing you couldn't be seen is exactly what that story was attempting to get across
 
malcah_ms said:
Mine I do believe was with my first Master when I was 18.

He had me meet him at this club (he was a mega sadist and out of control on narcotics...) and this big brute of a bouncer type dude brings me to this room. He blindfolds me and tells me just to wait. Master comes in and cuts my clothes off and says I'm to entertain his friends. He straps me down to this table and next thing I know I feel hands all over me, things in me like I was a science experiment.

I don't know how many of them there were, but it was a pretty bad situation. I could barely move afterwards. But the humiliation came from being used over and over with little regard for me as person just as property. Was pretty interesting.

I'm sorry.... is this thread about fantasy or dangerous reality?

Did those guys use condoms? Have you been tested for STDs? And what self-respecting submissive plays with a doped up dominant?... especially one you admit as being out of control?

i believed you to be a submissive that could set a good example, malcah but here you're saying it was a turn on and thrilling to put your life in this dominants hands? that it was okay to play with some drug-controlled dominant? Thats not control, that's a frightening lack of it!!
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ok I'll start it

SkylineBlue said:
Don't be a jackhead... in most parts of the US, it is illegal to expose your nipples or genitals on the streets.... and since you said you remove ALL her clothes, I can only assume she's butt-ass naked. SO yah, that's illegal.

But that's okay, it'll be even easier for the police to arrest her since she's already handcuffed...


And let's not forget how the unsuspecting citizen might react. It's one thing to do stuff in your own home or to even come out to people, it's another to expose them in such a direct manner and force them to be a part of your game, giving them no choice. Not exactly the kind of publicity that most of us want (or so I thought).

So now it comes down to personal insults SkylineBlue so I’m a (jackhead) and I like the way you cover your ass or should that be arse by saying…. in most parts of the U.S…. hmmmmm the last time I looked at an atlas of the world the united states as great as it is and don’t get me wrong I love U.S was not the only land mass on the planet. That out of the way where we live it is not illegal for a woman to go topless in public and further more some years back it was tested in court and it was found that for a woman to be charged with exposing her genitals she would have to be laying, with her legs spread as it was deemed by the courts that a woman’s genitals could not be seen otherwise, as they were concealed within her body. However if a woman is walking the streets naked and the police see her they will obviously pick her up for her own safety and take her home no charge's
So what now SkylineBlue ???
When I started this thread I was kind of hoping for some imaginative and creative people to show themselves not a bunch of backyard lawyers
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ok I'll start it

patchdog said:
When I started this thread I was kind of hoping for some imaginative and creative people to show themselves

hmm...

This board and the people involved concentrate on reality. So logic is that when posting a new message you should state if it is to be fantasy only.

Your title made it seem like very real punishments that you were asking about, now from this statement above it seems you may be looking for fantasy.

Maybe you could just let people know whether it's to be reality or fantasy?

BDSM isn't about putting people in danger for the hell of it. it's about fun yes, but it's also about responsibilities. (yawn i know...but it's true)

So you follow her in the car...ok. i can imagine that for a person to remove her from the pavement can take seconds and without you seeing. she would then be gone. And don't go telling me you watch her 100% during this. You're driving...if you do watch her 100% then you're dangerous driving...you should watch the road.
 
Originally posted by SkylineBlue
I'm sorry.... is this thread about fantasy or dangerous reality?

Did those guys use condoms? Have you been tested for STDs? And what self-respecting submissive plays with a doped up dominant?... especially one you admit as being out of control?

i believed you to be a submissive that could set a good example, malcah but here you're saying it was a turn on and thrilling to put your life in this dominants hands? that it was okay to play with some drug-controlled dominant? Thats not control, that's a frightening lack of it!!

Yep, I was 18 and not all that good at being wise then. He told me later that they did use condoms. He didn't start being a doped up dominant...he got into it later...and when he did, I left. Hurriedly. :) It is a hard situation to describe. I mentioned it because in retrospect it was humiliating and a really bad experience. It wasn't a "turn on" it was just a weird humiliating experience. :)
 
Originally posted by malcah_ms
Yep, I was 18 and not all that good at being wise then. He told me later that they did use condoms. And yes I am clean. He might have been a bizarro sadist dude, but he wasn't that crazy. He didn't start out being a doped up dominant...he got into it later...and when he did, I left because I had to. Hurriedly. :) It is a hard situation to describe without going into the long sordid history. I mentioned this experience because in retrospect it was humiliating. It wasn't a "turn on." I was scared out of my mind. :)

Oooops! This was supposed to edit the one above lol. Sorry. I still haven't had my allotment of coffee yet.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ok I'll start it

patchdog said:
So now it comes down to personal insults SkylineBlue so I’m a (jackhead) and I like the way you cover your ass or should that be arse by saying…. in most parts of the U.S…. hmmmmm the last time I looked at an atlas of the world the united states as great as it is and don’t get me wrong I love U.S was not the only land mass on the planet. That out of the way where we live it is not illegal for a woman to go topless in public and further more some years back it was tested in court and it was found that for a woman to be charged with exposing her genitals she would have to be laying, with her legs spread as it was deemed by the courts that a woman’s genitals could not be seen otherwise, as they were concealed within her body. However if a woman is walking the streets naked and the police see her they will obviously pick her up for her own safety and take her home no charge's
So what now SkylineBlue ???
When I started this thread I was kind of hoping for some imaginative and creative people to show themselves not a bunch of backyard lawyers


Neither you nor your profile mentioned you from being outside the US. I do not know international laws. But I do know very well that you ignored how I said her nipple exposing would be illegal in order to find ways that even without panties she would not be exposing her pubic region.... point is, if she was unclothed and walking the streets in most US cities, especially in a region that has motels and not hotels --- she would be exposing herself to arrest and mugging.

And I'm glad you made it clear that what happened was not a good thing, malcah. It is situations like that which make me glad I have such a sane and reliable boyfriend and no longer must tread the dangerous ground of first and second dates with some of the nutcases in this lifestyle.

I do not lack imagination or creativity. But sometimes I'm concerned for people's safety first.

And I think you should thank AA for pointing out threads that might interest you - and also take his advice in being clear when you start threads to state the reality or fantasy of the situations you post. You are realitively new to the site and so perhaps my reactions have caught you off guard especially since I voiced them. Many dominants are not accustomed to having those they think are submissive confront them.

I'm concerned about the safety of your submissive if this is how you expose her, I'm concerned about the safety of young submissives who might read that, think it's hot and then put themselves in danger doing it with something they don't know. I myself got myself into one or two mildly dangerous sitations when I first started out and am really likely they didn't go badly.

Don't forget that part of being consenual is that both adults assess the risks and dangers of what they do. Perhaps your submissive is a housewife or a waitress. But many submissives play more important roles at their jobs. I will be an architect, an darrest or a spotting by a client of me walking naked down the streets could lose me a job or worse, my career. The same goes for a teacher.

Fantasies are all well and fine and even allowed to be unrealistic... but if you're talking reality here, that's an entierly different story.
 
Thanks Blue :) At 37 I have a lot more sense. I am just at the extreme end of the spectrum is all :)
 
And there's nothing wrong with that. Life without risk is the cousin of death. I thought your story was hot.
 
I'm another kind of wet blanket and I also remind the populace that if it's silly, weird, dangerous, or just dumb and unerotic, a bottom can say "fuck no."

No one has a gun to her head, I presume.
 
Marquis said:
And there's nothing wrong with that. Life without risk is the cousin of death. I thought your story was hot.

On some level it is hot to me too... one of the reasons I enjoy Singularity's stories... but I know these to be fiction and that mentioning condoms in those stories would detract... but here on the forums where the general public may misunderstand or some newbie sub gets an idea that that sort of behavior is okay or ... worse... encouraged... well sometimes you just gotta put warning labels on it. That's the thing that creeps me out, if I feel there is real danger, it's hard to get turned on. Sort of like someone telling you to get hot and wet for him while he holds a cobra at your neck... other instinct kick in. Make sense?

Jay Wiseman in SM101 calls BDSM and especially the bondage part.... to be the most dangerous form of sex. I am not certain I believe this, but I half agree.
 
Last edited:
Netzach said:
I'm another kind of wet blanket and I also remind the populace that if it's silly, weird, dangerous, or just dumb and unerotic, a bottom can say "fuck no."

No one has a gun to her head, I presume.

Thanks for the show of support Netzach you are right to be a wet blanket and to point out the bloody obvious, my partner has no gun to her head!! She has never been forced to do anything she doesn’t want to be involved in nor have we done anything that we haven’t weighed up the risks in first. BDSM is about risk is it not? Safe risk’s offcourse and I would have thought that was to be obvious but as SkylineBlue has pointed out she feels that she needs to represent a section of the BDSM community that she regards as being naive or stupid enough to want to walk the streets naked and handcuffed without first judging risk because they read something. SkylineBlue you then tell me I should have made it clear that I was talking fantasy not reality, I simply explained what I and my partner had done on a number of occasions, we do it because it excites and turns us on obviously my mistake was sharing the experience. In regards to reality or fantasy hands up all those who have never read something in fantasy known it to be fantasy but than still adapted all or part of it to fit in with there reality?? an inspiration is an inspiration whether it comes from fantasy or reality!!!
SkylineBlue do you think the poor naive subs that you feel need your protection would know the different’s between reality and fantasy or would they really care
 
well, I also assume that if she does get arrested, whether she's convicted or not, for exposure, or procuring (which is certainly what most courts will think a butt ass naked woman walking down the street is doing) then you, as her Master and Lord, are going to shell out bail and fees. The laws on the books and the ways they are enforced are usually two different things. Women are, technically, *permitted* to go around shirtless in NYC. It's not usually something people take on and actually do.

I mean, you have considered all the risks inherent, as you said.

I'm kind of a safety fetishist too. I've had a lot of men want me to march them around the street naked and in a collar, and you know what? It's not going to happen, because I've weighed the risks and they are pretty damn substantial.

But if you've weighed those risks and find them tolerable, and plan on really taking resonsibility for what happens, have fun.
 
Originally posted by Netzach
well, I also assume that if she does get arrested, whether she's convicted or not, for exposure, or procuring (which is certainly what most courts will think a butt ass naked woman walking down the street is doing) then you, as her Master and Lord, are going to shell out bail and fees. The laws on the books and the ways they are enforced are usually two different things. Women are, technically, *permitted* to go around shirtless in NYC. It's not usually something people take on and actually do.

I mean, you have considered all the risks inherent, as you said.

I'm kind of a safety fetishist too. I've had a lot of men want me to march them around the street naked and in a collar, and you know what? It's not going to happen, because I've weighed the risks and they are pretty damn substantial.

But if you've weighed those risks and find them tolerable, and plan on really taking resonsibility for what happens, have fun.

I think I will agree with Netzach on her very candid point -- personal responsibility. It is a Top's duty to be responsible for their bottom in any and under any circumstances. When you are "owned" it means exactly that. Your Top has taken that responsible position. As long as you're willing to take on those responsibilities, whatever they maybe, then yes, enjoy and have your fun! We all come from our own different paths, some more extreme than others.

As for newbies, we have to give them the benefit of doubt that they aren't going to take what is written here as "gospel" -- I know that sure, some might but you have to wonder why they wouldn't read up on information especially when there are many resources out there, including books. You can't be expected (you in the general sense here) to watch over everyone. People have to accept their own paths and responsibilities, otherwise, what good are we?

I think this thread, like the "dark fantasy" one is a brave one to post. All patchdog wanted to do was share -- I think we can all be adult enough to accept that and comment -- whether we like it or not. We don't always have to agree on everything. We shouldn't automatically be suspicious or judge on first instance. It will always come out later if there is an issue with the info.

I wish patchdog and his sub good luck and to be safe and happy. Hopefully you guys won't get into too much trouble. :)

And hopefully I won't get blasted for this post. I like that I can speak my mind here and still get along with everyone.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ok I'll start it

patchdog said:
I’m following in the car

Where in your first post did you include this information??? You didn't, which is a BIG reason you are getting slammed in here.

We would hope that a Dominant would have their sub's best interest at heart, and i for one know that if my Master did something like that to me, we would be having a serious discussion about where we are headed.


Safe, Sane, Consensual................ i believe your first post defied 2 of those very important elements patchdog. What you wrote in your first post was not Safe, and was not Sane...... for the sub anyway........................

Just my 2 cents.........
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ok I'll start it

SierraMoon said:
Where in your first post did you include this information??? You didn't, which is a BIG reason you are getting slammed in here.

We would hope that a Dominant would have their sub's best interest at heart, and i for one know that if my Master did something like that to me, we would be having a serious discussion about where we are headed.


Safe, Sane, Consensual................ i believe your first post defied 2 of those very important elements patchdog. What you wrote in your first post was not Safe, and was not Sane...... for the sub anyway........................

Just my 2 cents.........

SierraMoon thanks for your two cents worth I’m guessing you are picking up where SkylineBlue left off !! your observations to why I am getting slammed are a little one side don’t you think after all I’ve read some of your stories and they are good stories however nowhere before or after have you yourself bothered to explain whether your stories were fact or fiction nor have you taken any of the eroticism away from your writings. By having to explain all the do’s, don’ts, safety and risk managements that that you feel I should have forwarded with my story, yes I’m being slammed for doing as you do but not doing as you say?
SierraMoon I’m not slamming you nor having a go at you, in regards to your other concerns Safe, Sane, Consensual I have already addressed these in earlier replies, I’ll make another statement now and I guess I’ll be slammed again but for what it’s worth: people if it your desire is to have a closed shop to newcomers simply say so, don’t give us double standards to follow??
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ok I'll start it

patchdog said:
SierraMoon thanks for your two cents worth I’m guessing you are picking up where SkylineBlue left off !! your observations to why I am getting slammed are a little one side don’t you think after all I’ve read some of your stories and they are good stories however nowhere before or after have you yourself bothered to explain whether your stories were fact or fiction nor have you taken any of the eroticism away from your writings. By having to explain all the do’s, don’ts, safety and risk managements that that you feel I should have forwarded with my story, yes I’m being slammed for doing as you do but not doing as you say?
SierraMoon I’m not slamming you nor having a go at you, in regards to your other concerns Safe, Sane, Consensual I have already addressed these in earlier replies, I’ll make another statement now and I guess I’ll be slammed again but for what it’s worth: people if it your desire is to have a closed shop to newcomers simply say so, don’t give us double standards to follow??


<sigh>

you miss the point... by nature, stories in the story area of this forum or of Literotica.com don't need warning labels because certain assumptions can already be made - it's a story and likely has been modified to fit a narrative format. Posts are different, there is no assumption that what you say is fictional...

and true, you shouldn't have to put warning labels on EVERY post... and your humiliation idea does have its erotic merits but it doesn't translate well into the real world without some mention of strict safety measures ... it's hard to find something erotic at all if you are wondering the full time if the girl is going to get abducted and raped or if she's going to wind up sitting in a jail cell with some cracked out hooker staring her down or losing her job because of her indiscretions. but i've already mentioned that and there is no need to continue hammering at it.

nor do i think you need to draw a line and start putting anyone who disagrees on one side of it.
 
Fine, i'll finish it.

patchdog said:
... people if it your desire is to have a closed shop to newcomers simply say so, don’t give us double standards to follow??
Not at all, but it would be nice if you guys did a search through the available threads before re-inventing a wheel.

Why?

Oh hell, i don't know ... maybe to find out what the rest of us have said before requesting our input.

Two? What better way to resurrect an older thread and check if the water feels the same to someone that has posted.

Three? It takes about 15 seconds to do a quickie search on Lit.

Example: Search on
  • Humiliation OR humiliation
  • in the BDSM Talk Forum
  • Search titles only
  • Show results as threads
  • under any date,
returned the following threads in under 10 seconds.

https://forum.literotica.com/search...=2208329&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending

No, we don't want an insular community. No, we don't think newcomers need to pay their dues. Yes, we think you have something to contribute to the conversation we haven't already heard. Yes, we like new voices. Yes, i thought your stories hot, but cringed at the risk factor. And yes, i know this comes off as a slap to the face. If not to you, someone else reading this will take it that way.

If you're confused at my approach, read my signature line.
 
Re: Fine, i'll finish it.

AngelicAssassin said:
Not at all, but it would be nice if you guys did a search through the available threads before re-inventing a wheel.

Why?

Oh hell, i don't know ... maybe to find out what the rest of us have said before requesting our input.

Two? What better way to resurrect an older thread and check if the water feels the same to someone that has posted.

Three? It takes about 15 seconds to do a quickie search on Lit.

Example: Search on
  • Humiliation OR humiliation
  • in the BDSM Talk Forum
  • Search titles only
  • Show results as threads
  • under any date,
returned the following threads in under 10 seconds.

https://forum.literotica.com/search...=2208329&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending

No, we don't want an insular community. No, we don't think newcomers need to pay their dues. Yes, we think you have something to contribute to the conversation we haven't already heard. Yes, we like new voices. Yes, i thought your stories hot, but cringed at the risk factor. And yes, i know this comes off as a slap to the face. If not to you, someone else reading this will take it that way.

If you're confused at my approach, read my signature line.


<bows>

kisses feet
 
Re: Fine, i'll finish it.

AngelicAssassin said:
Not at all, but it would be nice if you guys did a search through the available threads before re-inventing a wheel.

Why?

Oh hell, i don't know ... maybe to find out what the rest of us have said before requesting our input.

Two? What better way to resurrect an older thread and check if the water feels the same to someone that has posted.

Three? It takes about 15 seconds to do a quickie search on Lit.

Example: Search on
  • Humiliation OR humiliation
  • in the BDSM Talk Forum
  • Search titles only
  • Show results as threads
  • under any date,
returned the following threads in under 10 seconds.


AngelicAssassin thanks for your reply and I have not taken what you said as a slap in the face not at all in fact you’ve been helpful as I’d be the first one to admit computers and there workings are not second nature to me, I work for a living and it doesn’t involve computers.

In regards re-inventing the wheel I know where your coming from however the wheels been invented for a long time and we all just keep using it right, BDSM has been around since the beginning of time, started off as scratching in cave walls I’m not trying to invent a new wheel just push this one along a bit.

I note and quote you (i thought your stories hot, but cringed at the risk factor)
I don’t have a problem with this either you read what I had to say then thought to yourself that’s hot but noway does it fit in with your current style that’s fine.

The point I’m making here, I do have regard for your thoughts and concerns AngelicAssassin, I also have respect for your obvious maturity to be able to read something except it’s not for you and move on. What got my back up was a small section of this community and you can see who they are by looking back through the thread, who had absolutely nothing to contribute to it but felt it necessary to hysterically attack me and sabotage the thread frightening off anyone how would have liked to have contributed.


To this end I agree with you AngelicAssassin it is finished








https://forum.literotica.com/search...=2208329&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending

No, we don't want an insular community. No, we don't think newcomers need to pay their dues. Yes, we think you have something to contribute to the conversation we haven't already heard. Yes, we like new voices. Yes, i thought your stories hot, but cringed at the risk factor. And yes, i know this comes off as a slap to the face. If not to you, someone else reading this will take it that way.

If you're confused at my approach, read my signature line.
 
Back
Top