Proud Boy Dominic Pezzola Trial Derailed By Evidence Of FBI Corruption

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
62,714

Report: FBI Caught Doctoring, Destroying '338 Items of Evidence' in Jan. 6 Proud Boys Case​



By Jack Davis March 12, 2023 at 7:55am

CORRECTION, March 13, 2023: The original headline of this article misstated the number of evidence items said to be ordered to be destroyed. It is 338.

The FBI has been accused of doctoring evidence against a defendant who was involved in the Capitol incursion.

The controversy erupted last week after an attorney for Ethan Nordean, a Proud Boys member facing charges over the events of Jan. 6, 2021, said “hidden” messages between FBI agents had been found in a document presented to the court by FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller, according to Newsweek.

“[A] close examination of the agent’s sheet revealed over one thousand hidden Excel rows of messages,” a court document said.

More here: https://www.westernjournal.com/repo...ing-388-items-evidence-jan-6-proud-boys-case/

And Here: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/09/classified-info-proud-boys-trial-00086357

And Here:
Bottom line, the FBI has been caught ordering the destruction of 338 lines of exculpatory evidence in the Dominic Pezzola Proud Boy Trial. It's becoming clear he's been framed. Apparently FBI classified Information was inadvertently left hidden in an evidence submission that was discovered by the Defense showing agents were ordered to destroy 338 lines of exculpatory evidence denied to the defendant and his legal team. The defense has filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice or a mistrial order with the court.
 
Last edited:
More proof that “Right” guide is a lying, histrionic traitor.

It’s like “Right”guide didn’t even read the article they posted.

👉 “Right”guide 🤣

🇺🇸
 
We must have justice for Ethan, the one innocent man among 999 guilty ones.
 
Whether an agent has redacted some details of an investigation in accordance with the rules of disclosure or not redacted that data has no relevance to whether a resurrectionist tried to overthrow the elected government.
So the resurrectionists' lawyers have more data than they were entitled to. Whoopy doo. The agent needs a tutorial in Excel; saving the document as a csv file would have automatically removed the hidden lines.
 
Whether an agent has redacted some details of an investigation in accordance with the rules of disclosure or not redacted that data has no relevance to whether a resurrectionist tried to overthrow the elected government.
So the resurrectionists' lawyers have more data than they were entitled to. Whoopy doo. The agent needs a tutorial in Excel; saving the document as a csv file would have automatically removed the hidden lines.
That isn't the point, is it? The point is the government violated the Brady Rule, and conspired to break the law, which is sanctionable by the court.
 
It sounds like a reference to some of those “missing” secret service call logs that supposedly got lost in a update 🤔
 
I don't care much in the same way that I don't care when a Nazi is unprovoked and still gets punched in the throat.

Reichguide is far more upset by the alleged injustices committed against a Proud Boy than the actual crimes the Proud Boy committed against innocent American citizens.

We are not the same.
 

Oops. Rightguide fails again. 🤷‍♀️

Jury Convicts Four Leaders of the Proud Boys of Seditious Conspiracy Related to U.S. Capitol Breach​

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/...editious-conspiracy-related-us-capitol-breach

The four defendants and co-defendant Dominic Pezzola, 45, of Rochester, New York were also found guilty of obstruction of an official proceeding, conspiracy to prevent Members of Congress and federal law enforcement officers from discharging their duties, civil disorder, and destruction of government property. Pezzola was also found guilty of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers and robbery involving government property.
 
Last edited:

Oops. Rightguide fails again. 🤷‍♀️

Jury Convicts Four Leaders of the Proud Boys of Seditious Conspiracy Related to U.S. Capitol Breach​

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/...editious-conspiracy-related-us-capitol-breach

The four defendants and co-defendant Dominic Pezzola, 45, of Rochester, New York were also found guilty of obstruction of an official proceeding, conspiracy to prevent Members of Congress and federal law enforcement officers from discharging their duties, civil disorder, and destruction of government property. Pezzola was also found guilty of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers and robbery involving government property.

Another “Right”guide thread-fail???

Yawn.

Wake me up when “Right”guide finally gets that first W.

👉 “Right”guide 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Whether an agent has redacted some details of an investigation in accordance with the rules of disclosure or not redacted that data has no relevance to whether a resurrectionist tried to overthrow the elected government.
So the resurrectionists' lawyers have more data than they were entitled to. Whoopy doo. The agent needs a tutorial in Excel; saving the document as a csv file would have automatically removed the hidden lines.

So basically, you're ok with the government hiding the ball and destroying evidence just to get a conviction? It doesn't matter if the accused is guilty or not, convict him anyway?

I wonder how many people have been on death row after being wrongfully convicted because of people who think like you do? (The number is 193 since 1973)
 
So basically, you're ok with the government hiding the ball and destroying evidence just to get a conviction? It doesn't matter if the accused is guilty or not, convict him anyway?

I wonder how many people have been on death row after being wrongfully convicted because of people who think like you do? (The number is 193 since 1973)
Of course he is.
 
Of course he is.

It's because he gets his 15 microseconds of fame that way. It doesn't matter how many people get hurt because of what he does/believes, he gets his 15 microseconds of fame.

And THAT is what is most important to him because otherwise he's just a moron with an internet connection nobody gives a shit about IRL.
 
When a verdict comes out that you don't like, immediately blame it on corruption of the courts. That way, it doesn't matter that they received a full trial and were found guilty.......
 
Harpy had lost objectivity due to extreme right wing bias.

Not a good look for a paragon of justice.

SAD!!!

👉 Harpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
It's because he gets his 15 microseconds of fame that way. It doesn't matter how many people get hurt because of what he does/believes, he gets his 15 microseconds of fame.

And THAT is what is most important to him because otherwise he's just a moron with an internet connection nobody gives a shit about IRL.

Or maybe the judge reviewed the material in question and agreed that it was not exculpatory. ✅
 
Or maybe the judge reviewed the material in question and agreed that it was not exculpatory. ✅

ANYONE who believes a judge in a high profile case is "neutral" needs your head examined.
 
ANYONE who believes a judge in a high profile case is "neutral" needs your head examined.
There is never such a thing as neutral, though a judge is above party affiliation when deciding a case. If they are unable to be, they should recuse themselves.
 
ANYONE who believes a judge in a high profile case is "neutral" needs your head examined.

Then let’s stop pretending that you have respect for the process and the rule of law when things don’t go your way.
 
Then let’s stop pretending that you have respect for the process and the rule of law when things don’t go your way.

I have the greatest respect for the law. I have ZERO respect for the fuckwits who administer it or the morons who can't get their narrative straight because they claim either justice is corrupt (see eg the narrative about Clarence Thomas and the SCOTUS being "illegitimate") or that's it's perfect (as in this instance) without distinction except for the outcome they desire.

You cannot twist justice and the law to fit your end goal in spite of the truth and believe it to be "neutral." By doing so all you do is prove that you're not fit to discuss the subject or be in a position of power over others.
 
Back
Top