cjh
orgone accumulator
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Posts
- 32,630
I know that you would not.
Because if you did, it would open you up to attack and counterpoint and a defense of your belief system which I submit you do not have for you operate purely on what you feel at the moment.
I, on the other hand, have put down, in writing, how I arrive at my belief system using neither God, Rand, Mises or anyone else you want to use at a pathetic attack at ridicule.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=802444
So basically, like butters, you are skirting the edge of truthfulness.
Furthermore, to the person who had to diminish the life of Saul David Alinsky in order to prove he had no effect on our modern liberal...
![]()
Then why do you engage in his tactics? Are you saying that this is a chicken and egg scenario? Did he merely put your philosophy into words influencing no one, because Liberalism had already arrived at the point where it could not articulate itself cogently and defend its emerging compartmentalization.
Finally, where do all of you liberals stand on abortion, a civil right of women that can only exist if you first consider the unborn human being as subhuman.
It seems that the last time I posed that question was when you people went off the rails and started sputtering about Hayek, Rand and Parochial ideologies.
None of us have to jump through all your hoops to know these things.
1) Butters accused you of referring to the people of Haiti as subhuman, which you denied. You are sort-of-right but not really. Instead, you called them less than human, which is synonymous with subhuman.
2) Butters did not accuse you of racism.
3) Your meltdown in here is a sight to behold.
Last edited: