Promoting racial 'equity': California State Senate passes bill to allow schools not to report threats

SugarDaddy1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 6, 2012
Posts
1,904
The California State Senate has passed a bill that would allow schools not to report threats or attacks against employees or officials to law enforcement, despite the ongoing national shock and outrage over the Uvalde, Texas, mass school shooting.

The bill, SB 1273, introduced by State Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Los Angeles), passed easily last Thursday — just two days after the Uvalde shooting, in which an 18-year-old gunman murdered 19 children and two teachers in an elementary school.

The bill repeals a provision of existing law that requires that “whenever any employee of a school district or county superintendent of schools is attacked, assaulted, or physically threatened by any pupil, the employee and any person under whose direction or supervision the employee is employed who has knowledge of the incident are required to promptly report the incident to specified law enforcement authorities.” SB 1273 would make such reports to law enforcement voluntary.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has praised the Bradford bill as promoting racial “equity”: “Once students make contact with law enforcement, they are less likely to graduate high school and more likely to wind up in jail or prison. These harms fall disproportionately on students from marginalized groups: Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students, as well as students with disabilities, are disproportionately referred to law enforcement, cited, and arrested” (original emphasis).
https://www.breitbart.com/education...-bill-to-allow-schools-not-to-report-threats/
 
Even you should know better than to ever post anything from Breitbart.
 
aah, SamSang is Busybody.
Unmistakeable style.
Saw the name on the Board and didn't ring a bell, but the moment you read their posts...:D
 
From the OP quote;

"These harms fall disproportionately on students from marginalized groups: Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students, as well as students with disabilities, are disproportionately referred to law enforcement, cited, and arrested” (original emphasis). "

This language in not just from the ACLU, it is contained in the Senate discussion of the legislation, therefore it is a matter of legislative record.

Here is where it begs a question though. Are they disproportionate when matched against their particular groups percentage of the population, or do they disproportionately engage in threats and/or acts of violence? I'd like to hear/see and answer to that question.
 
From the OP quote;

"These harms fall disproportionately on students from marginalized groups: Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students, as well as students with disabilities, are disproportionately referred to law enforcement, cited, and arrested” (original emphasis). "

This language in not just from the ACLU, it is contained in the Senate discussion of the legislation, therefore it is a matter of legislative record.

Here is where it begs a question though. Are they disproportionate when matched against their particular groups percentage of the population, or do they disproportionately engage in threats and/or acts of violence? I'd like to hear/see and answer to that question.
Does your query include the kids with disabilities or just the brown ones?
 
Sugar baby starts yet another thread complaining about black people and baby killer is all on it like rightguard to scat porn.

Sad individuals.
 
Text of the bill:

SB 1273, as amended, Bradford. School safety: mandatory notifications.
(1) Existing law provides that any person who willfully disturbs any public school or any public school meeting is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of not more than $500. Under
This bill would exempt pupils who are currently enrolled in the school district from that provision.
(2) Under
existing law, whenever any employee of a school district or county superintendent of schools is attacked, assaulted, or physically threatened by any pupil, the employee and any person under whose direction or supervision the employee is employed who has knowledge of the incident are required to promptly report the incident to specified law enforcement authorities. Failure to make the report is an infraction punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000. An act by specified persons to inhibit or impede the making of the report is an infraction punishable by a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $1,000.
This bill would repeal those provisions.
(2)

(3) The federal Gun-Free Schools Act prohibits a local educational agency from receiving certain federal funds unless the local educational agency has a policy requiring referral to the criminal justice or juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm or weapon to a school served by the local educational agency.
Existing state law requires the principal of a school or the principal’s designee to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of the county or city in which the school is situated of certain acts committed by a pupil that may be unlawful, including, among others, the selling or possession of narcotics or other designated controlled or regulated substances, and acts of assault, as specified.
This bill would delete the acts referenced above from the category of acts for which the principal or the principal’s designee is required to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities, as described above. The bill would also exclude from this notification requirement a violation involving certain instruments, such as an instrument that expels metallic projectiles, a spot marker gun, a razor blade, or a box cutter. The bill would only require notification where notification would be consistent with the above-described referral requirement under the federal Gun-Free Schools Act. The bill would also make related conforming changes.

DIGEST KEY​

Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program:no


BILL TEXT​


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:​


SECTION 1.Section 32210 of the Education Code is repealed.

SECTION 1.

Section 32210 of the Education Code is amended to read:

32210.​

(a) Any person who willfully disturbs any public school or any public school meeting is guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).
(b) This section shall not apply to any person who is a pupil currently enrolled in the school district.

SEC. 2.​

Section 44014 of the Education Code is repealed.

SEC. 3.​

Section 48902 of the Education Code is amended to read:

48902.​

(a) The principal of a school or the principal’s designee shall notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of the county or city in which the school is located of any acts of a pupil that may involve a violation of Section 626.9 or 626.10 of the Penal Code, excluding a violation involving an instrument that expels a metallic projectile, such as a BB or a pellet, through the force of air pressure, carbon dioxide pressure, or spring action, a spot marker gun, a razor blade, or a box cutter. The notification requirement shall apply only to a violation where notification would be consistent with the requirements under the federal Gun-Free Schools Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 7961(h)).
(b) The principal of a school or the principal’s designee reporting a criminal act committed by a schoolage individual with exceptional needs, as defined in Section 56026, shall ensure that copies of the special education and disciplinary records of the pupil are transmitted, as described in Section 1415(k)(6) of Title 20 of the United States Code, for consideration by the appropriate authorities to whom the principal or the principal’s designee reports the criminal act. Any copies of the pupil’s special education and disciplinary records may be transmitted only to the extent permissible under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 1232g et seq.).
 
How low do you want to set the bar for acceptable behavior? And how long before NO teacher will set foot in the problem schools?
 
How low do you want to set the bar for acceptable behavior? And how long before NO teacher will set foot in the problem schools?
What teacher would want to teach in a school where they don't believe in US history or science?
 
Back
Top