"Proggressives" and the Wuhan Flu.

*chuckle*

I think you're somewhat talking for yourself and not some others that I could name here...

I am speaking for the general electorate of the UK and not for some UK GB members with extreme views. I have been engaged in UK politics for over 50 years and have had to work with politicians of all the major parties, sometimes all simultaneously, to get things done for the community.
 
We do the same thing in the local community.


It is not a national standard here and I, respectfully,
highly doubt that your nation is small enough
that the local represents the national...


:)
 
We do the same thing in the local community.


It is not a national standard here and I, respectfully,
highly doubt that your nation is small enough
that the local represents the national...


:)

And I mean National too. The majority of decisions made in the Houses of Parliament are made by cross-party agreement. It is the decisions that are divisive that get media attention.
 
Now...

Then...


Now = discussing a particular abstract behavior demonstrated by those who adhere to liberalism, or what you call "toxicshitsludge ideology".

Then = a personal behavior.

Nice try at a cheap shot through false analogy though.

Maybe someday you'll be slick enough to actually pull that act of dishonesty off.
 
And I mean National too. The majority of decisions made in the Houses of Parliament are made by cross-party agreement. It is the decisions that are divisive that get media attention.[/QUOTE

ya got the chrome dome on the ropes now. finish it NOW
 
And I mean National too. The majority of decisions made in the Houses of Parliament are made by cross-party agreement. It is the decisions that are divisive that get media attention.

Does it matter to you at all that I could say the same damned thing?



;) ;)
 
Yes, it matters because the media would make us believe it doesn't happen and that both sides are incompatible.

On a number of hot button issues they are incompatible and totally at odds with one another.

Stop buying the fake news.....shit's no good. :cool:
 
Yes, it matters because the media would make us believe it doesn't happen and that both sides are incompatible.

After two wars, you should know we are not compatible.

It takes the freaking Germans to unite us. :D



But really, all politics is local
but all political power is national.
Now, we don't squabble over potholes,
but we will fight passionately to control power
over others lest they gain the power to rule over us.


;) ;)
 
After two wars, you should know we are not compatible.

It takes the freaking Germans to unite us. :D



But really, all politics is local
but all political power is national.
Now, we don't squabble over potholes,
but we will fight passionately to control power
over others lest they gain the power to rule over us.


;) ;)

I meant the two sides in US and UK politics, not the US v UK. They haven't been compatible since 1914 because the US wanted to destroy the British Empire and start an empire of their own. Now the US seems to want to abdicate their empire to the Chinese.
 
Empire?



We're merchants, not bloody adventurers...

That's not what your policies have been. If it had been:

Why Korea? Vietnam? Iraq 1 and 2? Afghanistan?

Your allies are still pissed off that we have sent men and equipment to support US forces and for what? Contempt?

Australians are still annoyed about Vietnam. The official US history seems to ignore that Australians were ever there. They're even more annoyed than they are with the British about the loss of Australian forces at Gallipoli and the surrender of Singapore.
 
We are pretty piss-poor empire builders. Not only do we neither take earned, by right of conquest land and spoils of war, we also don't exact tribute or attempt to recover our expenditure.

In fact, we borrow money to pay to rebuild the things we knocked down to get the other country to give up.

We use billions to knock down stone-age infrastructure then pay billions more to rebuild it far better than it was

Hell of a way to run an empire.
 
That's not what your policies have been. If it had been:

Why Korea? Vietnam? Iraq 1 and 2? Afghanistan?

A whole host of reasons, none of which were imperialism.

Usually to stop "progressives" from "progressing" millions to death.


Your allies are still pissed off that we have sent men and equipment to support US forces and for what? Contempt?

The contempt doesn't stem from there obviously.

It comes from all the hateful shit talk about our nation, culture and society then the total arrogance to presume that we should run our shit the way you run yours because you're just so much better than we are.

Australians are still annoyed about Vietnam. The official US history seems to ignore that Australians were ever there. They're even more annoyed than they are with the British about the loss of Australian forces at Gallipoli and the surrender of Singapore.

All this sounds like grand reasons to not support us anymore and for us to save a bunch of blood and treasure.

It's god damn time to start cutting the haters off and hopefully Trump grows a pair and does it.
 
We are pretty piss-poor empire builders. Not only do we neither take earned, by right of conquest land and spoils of war, we also don't exact tribute or attempt to recover our expenditure.

In fact, we borrow money to pay to rebuild the things we knocked down to get the other country to give up.

We use billions to knock down stone-age infrastructure then pay billions more to rebuild it far better than it was

Hell of a way to run an empire.

He's been chugging leftist Kool-Aid.
 
Back
Top