President Biden continues to diversify courts

[butters]

The White House said the nominees continue fulfilling Biden's pledge to diversify the federal bench. Nearly three-quarters of his 98 federal judicial nominees have been women. A majority have been people of color.

The nominations came as the Senate confirmed two of Biden's earlier nominees, Charlotte Sweeney and Evelyn Padin, to be federal district court judges in Colorado and New Jersey, respectively.

Pan would fill a vacancy on the D.C. Circuit created by the U.S. Senate's April confirmation of Jackson to become the first Black woman on the Supreme Court once Justice Stephen Breyer retires at the end of this term.

The Senate in September confirmed Pan on a 68-30 vote to become the first Asian-American woman judge on the federal district court in Washington, D.C. She was previously a D.C. Superior Court judge.

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday will vote on advancing another D.C. Circuit nominee, U.S. District Judge J. Michelle Childs, whom Biden had considered for the Supreme Court nomination.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/

 

[Kindfarmer]

Pandering is pathetic. Some of these people were highly qualified. Others are simply a token. If I was a woman, I would be screaming about the corruption and absolute posing of the part of Pelosi, VPHarris, Klobuchar. as well as any other “centrist” which is code for corporate donor fellation tool. there are wonderful, super capable, super smart women in the party. They should be advanced by the constituents to leadership. AOC, Elizabeth, Warren, Hirono, and the baddest bitch on wheels Representative Katie Porter. we would do ourselves justice by appointing her benevolent dictator!

same goes for POC. Whip Clyburn is a straight up embarrassment. Warnock from Georgia is certainly not worthy of the church that MLK lead. I’m quite sure Jesus would be all about #UniversalHealthcare…..
obviously, Jeffries falls into this pathetic category.

Clarence Thomas and and Amy American Taliban girl are simply straight up criminals!

Who neads minorities when you can find endless old white guys to vote and institute same policies, the aforementioned morally bankrupt cretins have advocated for an occasionally past.

“Slightly better than an ongoing criminal enterprise” is worthy of performing our #duty just as much as the ongoing criminal enterprise!

 

[KeithD]

pandering is pathetic. Some of these people were highly qualified. Others are simply a token. . . .

Let's stop there to give you a few moments to substantiate that claim. If you don't, there's no need to read further.

 

[Kindfarmer]

Let's stop there to give you a few moments to substantiate that claim. If you don't, there's no need to read further.

if that is not given by simple observation, you should not be allowed near a polling booth.

3 simple words

KAMALA PHUKN HARRIS

Your blind allegiant tribalism is no better than the red blind allegiant tribalism. It’s what brought us here.

Hint……..HERE SUCKS!

 

[butters]

if that is not given by simple observation, you should not be allowed near a polling booth.

3 simple words

KAMALA PHUKN HARRIS

Your blind allegiant tribalism is no better than the red blind allegiant tribalism. It’s what brought us here.

Hint……..HERE SUCKS!

you're sounding like walker

and, as a woman, i do not agree with your views about Pelosi, Harris, Klobuchar, Clyburn and Warnock.

and while i'd love to see the likes of AOC, Warren and the other ladies you name have a more impactful voice, the simple fact is that by appealing to more centrist voters (both in 2020 and '22) the Democrat-led Presidency has seen more major bills pass into law than it would have. Of course the more leftist aims would have garnered certain votes but lost (probably) more of the centrist (the bulk of American voters). There's little i don't agree with in the opinions of AOC and Warren, but to lose the presidency, the senate and house when so much needs still to be done would be poking ourselves in the eye with a dirty stick. The answer to getting more influence on the houses, to get the better, more effective bills through to benefit the population, is for the people to vote a bigger majority for them... with less resistance, more could be done to effect the kind of rulings AOC, Warren AND the president want to see.

 

[Kindfarmer]

you're sounding like walker

and, as a woman, i do not agree with your views about Pelosi, Harris, Klobuchar, Clyburn and Warnock.

and while i'd love to see the likes of AOC, Warren and the other ladies you name have a more impactful voice, the simple fact is that by appealing to more centrist voters (both in 2020 and '22) the Democrat-led Presidency has seen more major bills pass into law than it would have. Of course the more leftist aims would have garnered certain votes but lost (probably) more of the centrist (the bulk of American voters). There's little i don't agree with in the opinions of AOC and Warren, but to lose the presidency, the senate and house when so much needs still to be done would be poking ourselves in the eye with a dirty stick. The answer to getting more influence on the houses, to get the better, more effective bills through to benefit the population, is for the people to vote a bigger majority for them... with less resistance, more could be done to effect the kind of rulings AOC, Warren AND the president want to see.

opinions are NOT relevant in politic. Votes, policy, advocation, and honesty are the relevant topics. demanding quality policy is one of the constituents most important jobs. Every single officeholder in Washington DC that accept lobbyist and corporate money are dirty. Nancy is one of the dirtiest ones in the district. She takes just as many rubles as any GOP office holder. This is simple stuff. You can look it up on opensecrets.org. you need to change your opinion to facts about the officeholder. Either that, or stop being a mouthpiece for the DNC, which ever The answer is an educated electorate. The GOP has no monopoly on complete void of political acumen constituents. Fucking vote green party or something. Christ, a giant astroid has a better chance than American citizens fulfilling their citizen duty. We suck.

 

[Chobham]

Diversity for the sake of diversity is nothing more than brain dead virtue signaling.

 

[Kindfarmer]

The answer is an educated electorate. The GOP has no monopoly on complete void of political acumen constituents. Fucking vote green party or something. Christ, a giant astroid has a better chance than American citizens fulfilling their citizen duty. We suck.

you're sounding like walker

and, as a woman, i do not agree with your views about Pelosi, Harris, Klobuchar, Clyburn and Warnock.

and while i'd love to see the likes of AOC, Warren and the other ladies you name have a more impactful voice, the simple fact is that by appealing to more centrist voters (both in 2020 and '22) the Democrat-led Presidency has seen more major bills pass into law than it would have. Of course the more leftist aims would have garnered certain votes but lost (probably) more of the centrist (the bulk of American voters). There's little i don't agree with in the opinions of AOC and Warren, but to lose the presidency, the senate and house when so much needs still to be done would be poking ourselves in the eye with a dirty stick. The answer to getting more influence on the houses, to get the better, more effective bills through to benefit the population, is for the people to vote a bigger majority for them... with less resistance, more could be done to effect the kind of rulings AOC, Warren AND the president want to see.

I am remiss. You are correct about one thing. That’s really rare for a democrat constituent it. If you want to win, elections, improve people, live in a statistically significant matter by legislation.

 

[Kindfarmer]

you're sounding like walker

and, as a woman, i do not agree with your views about Pelosi, Harris, Klobuchar, Clyburn and Warnock.

and while i'd love to see the likes of AOC, Warren and the other ladies you name have a more impactful voice, the simple fact is that by appealing to more centrist voters (both in 2020 and '22) the Democrat-led Presidency has seen more major bills pass into law than it would have. Of course the more leftist aims would have garnered certain votes but lost (probably) more of the centrist (the bulk of American voters). There's little i don't agree with in the opinions of AOC and Warren, but to lose the presidency, the senate and house when so much needs still to be done would be poking ourselves in the eye with a dirty stick. The answer to getting more influence on the houses, to get the better, more effective bills through to benefit the population, is for the people to vote a bigger majority for them... with less resistance, more could be done to effect the kind of rulings AOC, Warren AND the president want to see.

how do you not see their blatant donor acquiescence. None of them are demanding. #UniversalHealthcare. none of them are demanding quality public school reforms. None of them are demanding a real justice system reform hell, none of them are and counted hand marked people found pig, the most secure election process ever invented pee. None of them are demanding they return to Eisenhower type tax bracket with no loopholes, and capital gains considered as income. There’s a reason that was the most robust economy in history none of them are demanding an expansion of the Supreme Court to 13 members. none of them are demanding an end to corporate subsidies. none of them are advocating for citizens to do their duty. None of them are legitimate representatives of WtP.

Ralph Nader was right. The donor class owns both parties. Advocating for some basic.l Human rights is not exactly the definition of quality government..

 

[Kindfarmer]

you're sounding like walker

and, as a woman, i do not agree with your views about Pelosi, Harris, Klobuchar, Clyburn and Warnock.

and while i'd love to see the likes of AOC, Warren and the other ladies you name have a more impactful voice, the simple fact is that by appealing to more centrist voters (both in 2020 and '22) the Democrat-led Presidency has seen more major bills pass into law than it would have. Of course the more leftist aims would have garnered certain votes but lost (probably) more of the centrist (the bulk of American voters). There's little i don't agree with in the opinions of AOC and Warren, but to lose the presidency, the senate and house when so much needs still to be done would be poking ourselves in the eye with a dirty stick. The answer to getting more influence on the houses, to get the better, more effective bills through to benefit the population, is for the people to vote a bigger majority for them... with less resistance, more could be done to effect the kind of rulings AOC, Warren AND the president want to see.

2020 was our chance to really change things. A dead skunk would have fucking beat the Velveeta treasonweasel. and we nominate an old white guy to solve the problems caused by old white guys. Fucking ridiculous I forgot to point out that something. there is no quality legislation from this administration. There is only insulting tokens. Shame on you for not understanding the laws that have been an active during this cycle. double shame on you.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Diversity for the sake of diversity is nothing more than brain dead virtue signaling.

Who decides when diversity is being done for the sake of diversity, though?

outside of a few selected paid token mouthpieces, nobody ever actually hears "diversity" saying this.

must be because their skin is actually in the game as their lives are the ones on the line from having to live with "non-diversity's" policies every single day.

 

[KeithD]

if that is not given by simple observation, you should not be allowed near a polling booth.

3 simple words

KAMALA PHUKN HARRIS

Your blind allegiant tribalism is no better than the red blind allegiant tribalism. It’s what brought us here.

Hint……..HERE SUCKS!

In other words, you just made it up. Off to ignore for you.

 

[Kindfarmer]

Let's stop there to give you a few moments to substantiate that claim. If you don't, there's no need to read further.

Excuse me? Substantiate? Fucking pay attention. You can’t afford me as your research assistant, I promise you.

 

[Kindfarmer]

In other words, you just made it up. Off to ignore for you.

Because you have no concept of career accomplishments, or lack there of, policy advocations and actual votes, doesn’t mean that I need to take the time to educate you. Thank you for being the poster child of what is wrong with ‘Murrikkka. Democrat constituents are far more liable for the shitty place that we find ourselves in at this particular juncture. As if the GOP and it’s constituents are going to hold anyone accountable for quality government? A tiny bit less corrupt and slightly better than an ongoing criminal enterprise is by no means good government. Until you learn something about quality government, policy, and sociopolitik in general. Refrain from replying to me, it will be ignored. I am a gentleman. I thought I owed you that to save yourself the effort. The only single thing she brought to this particular administration is her token existence as a woman of color. Don’t accuse me of bringing race into the conversation. That was done by the DNC when they appointed her as Biden’s running mate.

I will however because I’m a benevolent guy, give you the Cliff Notes version. She hasn’t done shit to move us forward towards good government or a high quality of living society.
Anyone that supports a one time AG of the largest state in the union that did not use their platform to advocate for the decriminalization and legalization of marijuana, but actually imprisoned them for it can fuck off. And when they get there, they can fuck off some more….

 

[Kindfarmer]

Excuse me? Substantiate? Fucking pay attention. You can’t afford me as your political consultant.

Who decides when diversity is being done for the sake of diversity, though?

outside of a few selected paid token mouthpieces, nobody ever actually hears "diversity" saying this.

must be because their skin is actually in the game as their lives are the ones on the line from having to live with "non-diversity's" policies every

 

[Kindfarmer]

Who decides when diversity is being done for the sake of diversity, though?

outside of a few selected paid token mouthpieces, nobody ever actually hears "diversity" saying this.

must be because their skin is actually in the game as their lives are the ones on the line from having to live with "non-diversity's" policies every single day.

I don’t care what my minority demographic you belong to you. If all you’re going to do is vote an old white guy, you can burn in hell with the rest of them as far as I’m concerned!

 

[Kindfarmer]

you're sounding like walker

and, as a woman, i do not agree with your views about Pelosi, Harris, Klobuchar, Clyburn and Warnock.

and while i'd love to see the likes of AOC, Warren and the other ladies you name have a more impactful voice, the simple fact is that by appealing to more centrist voters (both in 2020 and '22) the Democrat-led Presidency has seen more major bills pass into law than it would have. Of course the more leftist aims would have garnered certain votes but lost (probably) more of the centrist (the bulk of American voters). There's little i don't agree with in the opinions of AOC and Warren, but to lose the presidency, the senate and house when so much needs still to be done would be poking ourselves in the eye with a dirty stick. The answer to getting more influence on the houses, to get the better, more effective bills through to benefit the population, is for the people to vote a bigger majority for them... with less resistance, more could be done to effect the kind of rulings AOC, Warren AND the president want to see.

I forgot the most prescient point concerning your “centrist” verbiage. Until there’s one single member of Congress who calls themselves that who’s not just a corporate tool, it’s not even a legitimate political position. It’s code for “donor fellator for hire”

 

[Kindfarmer]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/

I do owe you an apology. I am remiss. I have no doubt his judicial nominations are highly qualified. My comments were directed at people in the administration specifically.

 

[Kindfarmer]

Diversity for the sake of diversity is nothing more than brain dead virtue signaling.

Not if the candidates are of equal qualification. Then, given the systemic white guy advantage in our society, the minority should be given the nod. Until we are can create a bit of equal opportunity in the rest of society, it’s the least we can do. Affirmative action does not advocate naming in minority to any position or promotion thereof simply because they are a minority. It is a given that qualifications for the position are a given.

 

[Kindfarmer]

Pandering is pathetic. Some of these people were highly qualified. Others are simply a token. If I was a woman, I would be screaming about the corruption and absolute posing of the part of Pelosi, VPHarris, Klobuchar. as well as any other “centrist” which is code for corporate donor fellation tool. there are wonderful, super capable, super smart women in the party. They should be advanced by the constituents to leadership. AOC, Elizabeth, Warren, Hirono, and the baddest bitch on wheels Representative Katie Porter. we would do ourselves justice by appointing her benevolent dictator!

same goes for POC. Whip Clyburn is a straight up embarrassment. Warnock from Georgia is certainly not worthy of the church that MLK lead. I’m quite sure Jesus would be all about #UniversalHealthcare…..
obviously, Jeffries falls into this pathetic category.

Clarence Thomas and and Amy American Taliban girl are simply straight up criminals!

Who neads minorities when you can find endless old white guys to vote and institute same policies, the aforementioned morally bankrupt cretins have advocated for an occasionally past.

“Slightly better than an ongoing criminal enterprise” is worthy of performing our #duty just as much as the ongoing criminal enterprise! View attachment 2191872

@JadeNYC what is so funny?

 

[butters]

 

[BluesDriver66]

I think what Kindfarmer is saying here is:

1. Democrats who take corporate money are compromised.

2. Politicians regardless of party should be judged on accomplishments and not campaign slogans.

3. Blind loyalty to a party that fails only leads to more failure.

Once you start taking money for sex you're a prostitute. Full stop. If you take one dime of corporate money in Congress you're a corporate whore. I know they won't tell that in corporate newspapers and on corporate radio and television news but that's because they're corporate whores themselves. Uber liberal Rachel Maddow who gets paid $40,000 a day is not going to do in depth reporting on political corruption inside the Democratic party or Pelosi and her husband's insider trading.

The record of Democratic accomplishment is less than zero. Literally. When you are losing long held Constitutional rights such as access to abortion you are going backwards. The Democratic party is an abject failure. When you lose a Presidential election to a tv gameshow host with no political experience you have completely shit the bed. Every last one of them should have committed seppuku on the Capitol steps the next day in shame. Losing to that fucking moron is like a heavy weight boxer losing a fist fight to a one armed Girl Scout in a wheelchair. There are no excuses.

I get it. You hate Republicans. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together and an ounce of humanity in their soul usually does. But that doesn't mean the Democratic party isn't corrupt to it's core and massively failing it's members in particular and the country as a whole. Sorry. Not openly pandering to racists and homophobes just is not good enough. Accomplishments like universal health care and legalizing marijuana is what is needed. Bold, unflinching, aggressive, leadership. Not more excuses of how the party of world class idiots like Trump, Green, and Walker outsmarted you again.

 

[jaF0]

Gotta be peckersniffer.

 

[butters]

I get it. You hate Republicans. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together and an ounce of humanity in their soul usually does. But that doesn't mean the Democratic party isn't corrupt to it's core and massively failing it's members in particular and the country as a whole. Sorry. Not openly pandering to racists and homophobes just is not good enough. Accomplishments like universal health care and legalizing marijuana is what is needed. Bold, unflinching, aggressive, leadership. Not more excuses of how the party of world class idiots like Trump, Green, and Walker outsmarted you again.

yes, there's corruption... just look at the types of manchin and sinema to start with.

But when the senate is so 50/50 and the house only previously owning a slim majority and soon to have a slim minority, will 'bold, unflinching, aggressive' leadership lose more support than it garners, especially when bipartisan efforts are required to pass anything? Personally, i would LOVE to see what's needed regarding healthcare, sustainable green energy and everything else. Practically, a hung governing body can push towards that goal ONLY incrementally.

 

[BluesDriver66]

yes, there's corruption... just look at the types of manchin and sinema to start with.

But when the senate is so 50/50 and the house only previously owning a slim majority and soon to have a slim minority, will 'bold, unflinching, aggressive' leadership lose more support than it garners, especially when bipartisan efforts are required to pass anything? Personally, i would LOVE to see what's needed regarding healthcare, sustainable green energy and everything else. Practically, a hung governing body can push towards that goal ONLY incrementally.

The corruption starts at the top. Blaming Manchin and Sinema is like a Mafia Don blaming his street goons for all the criminal activity in his organization. Manchin is a Democrat in good standing which receives thousands upon thousands of dollars in support from the Democratic party every time he runs for office.

Bipartisan efforts with Republicans is literally bipartisan support with Nazis at this point. There is no rehabilitation of Republicans. They must be destroyed politically and sent to the dust bins of history.