POV's in Literature, Films, and Video Games.

OddLove

Aimless Wanderer
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Posts
273
I was watching a YouTube video about different POV for writing, which all made sense to me in the context of literature and movies/TV shows.

But I spent some time thinking (much longer than I care to admit) before I realized video games don't follow the same classic rules for how they describe what POV a video game is in.

If you're looking through your characters eyes, such as Call of Duty and Doom type games, they call it first-person.

If you're looking over your characters shoulders, such as Spyro or Tomb Raider type games, they call it third-person.

Also, there's 'Bird-Eye view' such as Diablo and Sim games, which is still advertised and categorized as third-person.

But what's confusing to me is, the more I think about how both first-person and third-person POV's in video games functionally work, neither of them seem to be first-person OR third-person. Because in a video game, you are a character, whether it be a plumber fighting evil turtles, a barbarian or wizard slaying demons, a sim's character living life, a driver racing down a dangerous road, or a fire-breathing dragon collecting gems. Functionally, those are second-person 'choose-your-own-adventure' stories.

You slide down a sewer pipe into a dark and scary underground city, You see a hostile turtle with a spikey red shell. It's aggressively approaching You. You run straight at it and leap into the air then stomp down on it's head, ringing it's bell and forcing it to retreat into it's shell. When You spot another hostile turtle up ahead, You grab the dazed turtles spiky red shell and hurl it into Your other foe, killing both Your enemies in the process.

Like... how is Mario not a second-person POV choose-your-own-adventure story? Actually, how's every video game ever made not a second-person POV story for that matter?

I don't know if I'm just confused and wrong about this, or baffled from this epiphany. Maybe it's super obvious to others. So I'm kinda curious what people think.

Are video games just 'second-person' films? Or am I tripping?

If I'm tripping, please feel free to explain why I'm wrong.
 
Last edited:
The main thing I think you're driving at is that an interactive computer game and prose are fundamentally different forms of media, and trying to describe one in terms of the other is difficult.

What perspective or 'person' would you describe paintings in? Or ceramics?

I think computer games have borrowed terminology from written prose for convenience's sake but I don't think it means the same thing.
 
I was watching a YouTube video about different POV for writing, which all made sense to me in the context of literature and movies/TV shows.

But I spent some time thinking (much longer than I care to admit) before I realized video games don't follow the same classic rules for how they describe what POV a video game is in.

If you're looking through your characters eyes, such as Call of Duty and Doom type games, they call it first-person.

If you're looking over your characters shoulders, such as Spyro or Tomb Raider type games, they call it third-person.

Also, there's 'Bird-Eye view' such as Diablo and Sim games, which is still advertised and categorized as third-person.

But what's confusing to me is, the more I think about how both first-person and third-person POV's in video games functionally work, neither of them seem to be first-person OR third-person. Because in a video game, you are a character, whether it be a plumber fighting evil turtles, a barbarian or wizard slaying demons, a sim's character living life, a driver racing down a dangerous road, or a fire-breathing dragon collecting gems. Functionally, those are second-person 'choose-your-own-adventure' stories.

You slide down a sewer pipe into a dark and scary underground city, You see a hostile turtle with a spikey red shell. It's aggressively approaching You. You run straight at it and leap into the air then stomp down on it's head, ringing it's bell and forcing it to retreat into it's shell. When You spot another hostile turtle up ahead, You grab the dazed turtles spiky red shell and hurl it into Your other foe, killing both Your enemies in the process.

Like... how is Mario not a second-person POV choose-your-own-adventure story? Actually, how's every video game ever made not a second-person POV story for that matter?

I don't know if I'm just confused and wrong about this, or baffled from this epiphany. Maybe it's super obvious to others. So I'm kinda curious what people think.

Are video games just 'second-person' films? Or am I tripping?

If I'm tripping, please feel free to explain why I'm wrong.
I think who the player is and how they interact with the characters matter more than camera angles in a game.

Take the Sims or Black & White: you aren't a character exactly, you are essentially a god directing and controlling characters toward basic objectives. This would be third person omniscient.

Tell-tale style games are what I'd consider 2nd person. You are making choices for the characters that affect the outcome of the story, but not controlling the character exactly. You are meant to be the character making the necessary choices in the moment. Life is Strange is another good example of this.

First person games are ones where you are the character and you are controlling every aspect of what the character does and how they interact with the world around them in a way that has *some* impact on the end game. Persona is a good example of this.

Third close are those games where you control a character, but your choices don't affect the storyline. The Last of Us is a good example of this. It doesn't matter what you do, the end game is the same, you are just getting them from point A to point B, the details ultimately don't matter once you get to the end.

All of this also depends on if the game is open ended, open world, or linear. Linear games are going to lean more first or third person. 2nd and omniscient tend to be more open ended. Open world games can fall between those as they can be linear or open ended but gives the player a lot more freedom within the world even if that freedom doesn't really matter.

Ultimately, games can be cross POV as well where a game can straddle two of these categories easily depending on how you look at the game and how you personally play.
 
Back
Top