voluptuary_manque
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2007
- Posts
- 30,841
I jokingly suggested donating a plaque dedicating the new shithouses at the park to those two.
Appropriate, appropriate. *nods sagely*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I jokingly suggested donating a plaque dedicating the new shithouses at the park to those two.
Yet Scouting allows members to be pagans. Worshipers of many gods. Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians. A kid could say they believe that they, themselves are god, and that would pass--they're not an atheist. Hell, if I had kids and they said, "We're not atheists, we worship the devil" by the scout rules they'd be let in as they're not atheists and those are the only ones not allowed in.Religious organizations provide an overwhelming percentage of the meeting places and funding for the BSA. The plain and simple truth is that they cannot go against the dominant opinion of what is nearly their only source of support.
Take away the churches in the U.S., and scouting more or less ceases to exist. The few places where it could survive on other support ( primarily on the east and west coast ) could not sustain the organization, and it would fail.
http://bestsmileys.com/crying/2.gifIn at least two of the incidents that I know about, the original drive for the project was started by a scout organizing for the community service project necessary to advance to Eagle. One managed to complete his requirements, but the other had to start all over after several weeks of personal footwork because two people complained about church and state issues over the youth center, cleaning a public park, landscaping, and finding funding for new equipment.
And, ya know, people say Dr. Joseph Mengele was one of the nicest people in the world. A real Christian neighbor, great with kids. Does it really matter that he wasn't all that kind to Jews?
Fair enough. Let's try this, using your own example with a couple of changes:Yeah, that's an appropriate comparison. Scouting and horrific medical experiments on Jews. I don't see how I missed the connection before.
They try and try to serve the community and those darn atheists and gays just won't let 'em. Oh, wait...maybe because they won't let the gays or atheists join their exclusive club
Full article here.
This happens over and over again and I wish someone would just put an end to it. If the Scouts want to exclude those who don't believe in god or are gay, that's fine. Like any "Church" or other private club they can do that. But that means they have to obey the rules of such exclusive clubs/churches. They can't be supported by the state or given favor by the state over others who would, like the state, have to be inclusive of all by law.
I don't give a fuck how wonderful, helpful, marvelous, or character building the organization has been in the past or still is, they can't have it both ways. Either they follow the law or they don't, and if they don't then they don't get any special favors.
You see that is where we differ. I believe that we DO get a say. If getting that say means that we need to go to court so that we are heard, fine. That is why the courts are there.
As far as toning it down? I guess you need to live it to understand why that isn't an acceptable alternative. Shouting at people that wish we'd just shut up and go back into the "closet" like good little queers is often the only way of getting their attention. Your an ex-military guy, so I'm sure you understand multiple / varied attacks, hmmm? BTW, education only works on people when you have their attention.
P.S. I'm no longer willing to "wait for them to die" to get my rights as a human being. Far as I'm concerned any non-violent means available can / should / will be used to get what we should have always had from the beginning.
So much hate and intolerance!![]()
Yeah, that's an appropriate comparison. Scouting and horrific medical experiments on Jews. I don't see how I missed the connection before.
Ladies and gentlemen, Godwin's Law in action.
Have a nice day.
Fair enough. Let's try this, using your own example with a couple of changes:
"In at least two of the incidents that I know about, the original drive for the project was started by a scout organizing for the community service project necessary to advance to Eagle. One managed to complete his requirements, but the other had to start all over after several weeks of personal footwork because the NAACP complained about the fact that the youth center discriminated against children of color....The NAACP then protested in front of the scouts....and that quite frankly honked me off, big time. Thankfully, the new local authorities, members of the local KKK, ignored them. The NAACP had a year to organize their own fundraisers and people to do the work, but they were too busy trying to sit at the front of the bus and eating at lunch counters, usually on a weekly basis...."
Now let me ask you, if this was the case, as outlined above, would you still think the scouts were being wronged? All kinds of people do wonderful things. There were plenty of men who were Eagle scouts and cleaning up parks who also joined the KKK. Nazi youth, I'm sure, were as good as any scouts in being wonderful, lawful kids.
My point is: If you let people who do wonderful things for people get off with being bigots, then you head toward a slippery slope. One where so long as the bigots do good deeds, you'll let 'em off scott free. It seems trivial and mean to protest so to you, but it doesn't seem so to anyone who's on the other side of that bigotry. And if you were, I don't think you'd be shaking your head saying that these people are "tossing out the baby with the bathwater."
How badly have you, personally, been discriminated against for your race, religion or sexual orientation? Imagine that you'd been discriminated in that way every day your whole life long. And now imagine someone telling you, "How could you stop that organization that discriminates against you from cleaning up the park! Why do you keep protesting them?"Hello? Hint: It's not the protesters. It's the organization that needs to make up its mind what it wants to do. Once again, scouting KNOWS it discriminates and it KNOWS there are protests and challenges about this when it gets public funding. So let is ask for funding by churches and private organizations to clean up parks and other public works. Then it can discriminate all it likes.
"In at least two of the incidents that I know about, the original drive for the project was started by a scout organizing for the community service project necessary to advance to Eagle. One managed to complete his requirements, but the other had to start all over after several weeks of personal footwork because the NAACP complained about the fact that the youth center discriminated against children of color....The NAACP then protested in front of the scouts....and that quite frankly honked me off, big time. Thankfully, the new local authorities, members of the local KKK, ignored them. The NAACP had a year to organize their own fundraisers and people to do the work, but they were too busy trying to sit at the front of the bus and eating at lunch counters, usually on a weekly basis...."
You're an asshole, Dark. I've always suspected it but now here's the proof. Have a nice motherfuckin life.
So, we've moved one tick down the scale of comparisons from horrific Nazi medical experiments to the KKK setting bombs, burning churches, lynching black people, dragging them behind cars...
Yep, that's much closer.
Even removing the apples to arsenic comparison, your premise is still nothing resembling reality. In the two situations I cite, the scouts gained no special benefits. No extra access. No monetary gain. No government funding ( save that the long abandoned, and now once again abandoned building is owned by the city, in the case of the youth center. ) Not even a plaque or a poster recognizing the scouts as the driving force behind the opening of the youth center or the original plan to bring the park back to life.
Nothing.
It was on public land, and the two athiest loudmouth prickfucks used that ( and their status as the largest donors to political figures in the area ) to ram their opinions down everybody else's throat.
Here's one for you. If the athiests were running the facility, and the Boy Scouts said that it made them uncomfortable to go there, is that the same thing?
You'll have to pardon me if something in my wiring doesn't allow me to be assimilated in the collective. I have this defective process called thinking that keeps me from mindlessly wasting bandwidth to multi-post things like "Me too" and "What she said -- you suck"
You want asshole, I can do asshole. It's easy when there are so many fine examples to copy.
Surely you aren't trying to say that the BSA isn't anti-gay / non-religious? Of course they are.