fukngroovn
Blah blah blah.......
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Posts
- 5,268
All you need is love, but society needs a wee bit more.
Econ gets you hot, huh? Micro or macro? Heterodox or orthodox?
Econ sux ass!!! I hate that class!! Getting a B in if dammit!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All you need is love, but society needs a wee bit more.
Econ gets you hot, huh? Micro or macro? Heterodox or orthodox?
Getting a masters in it! You don't know what the words "Econ sucks ass" mean.Econ sux ass!!! I hate that class!! Getting a B in if dammit!!!
Both! Throw a little finance or stats in there and you're gonna push me over the edge...All you need is love, but society needs a wee bit more.
Econ gets you hot, huh? Micro or macro? Heterodox or orthodox?
Want some tudoringEcon sux ass!!! I hate that class!! Getting a B in if dammit!!!
Getting a masters in it! You don't know what the words "Econ sucks ass" mean.
Want some tudoring![]()
Society depends on many constructions.All you need is love, but society needs a wee bit more.
Econ gets you hot, huh? Micro or macro? Heterodox or orthodox?
You don't want to have a late night cramming session with me?To late now babes. Only one test left and it's wens!!!

Want some tudoring![]()
Not really- we explain society via constructs...that doesn't make them necessary.Society depends on many constructions.
Heh, everybody knows that micro is hotter because of its focused descriptions of intercourse. And, in answer to the second question (which also wasn't addressed to me), both are important and one wouldn't be identifiable without the other... by definition.
Bad Day! Go to my room. I'll tudor you! (whatever that means)You don't want to have a late night cramming session with me?
....and, um, I think we hijacked this thread...
Sorry![]()
You don't want to have a late night cramming session with me?
....and, um, I think we hijacked this thread...
Sorry![]()

Not really- we explain society via constructs...that doesn't make them necessary.
To say 'we explain x via x' is a tautology; however, that we explain x via x and it seems to work - for the most part unquestioned - is fascinating.![]()

You're welcome. ;-)Saying a tautology is a tautology is a tautology.
There are many x-planationsso, I don't see it as an out-n-out tautology.
And who says we don't question our constructs-
have you heard of the social sciences? That's their purview, their bread and butter.
You're welcome. ;-)
A) Note I hedged with 'for the most part'
B) Have you ever had a conversation with someone else that accomplished something? That is only possible by allowing generalizations and other various conceptual constructions to pass unquestioned.
Yes. Technically, it's my bread and butter.

Social scientist.What's your (horniest) profession?![]()
A lofty goal, to be sure, however, increased specificity (clear cut definitions) doesn't necessarily guarantee improved understanding of what is said.ETA: I like getting very specific in conversation. I hate generalizing, I want clear cut definitions.
Social scientist.
A lofty goal, to be sure, however, increased specificity (clear cut definitions) doesn't necessarily guarantee improved understanding of what is said.
In fact, sometimes, it can diminish it. In the worst cases, it can render the statement senseless.

Words are not meaningless, but the meaning of words is irremediably tied to their usage in situ.What's that? Words are meaningless?
Reductio ad absurdum is a bad way to go (unless you're trying to make a point).
Like I said, its fascinating.Then it's fun...
Can I recommend moving to my teknically correct thread- and let the happy PGers have their horny thread?
GMT +2 is my home time zone.![]()
To quote Forrest Gump (I recently saw the movie...for the umpteenth time)Aren't you a clever fellow.
a) Tetriak already said what he is.Teknight and Tetriak, both of whom I suspect are IT have just proved my earlier point. IT guys and Engineers are definitely NOT horny, in fact not even interesting.