Political thread...how does this make you feel?

ABSTRUSE

Cirque du Freak
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
50,094
Murder case puts Iraqi gov't in quandary

BAGHDAD, Iraq - No sooner had U.S. authorities filed rape and murder charges against ex-soldier Steven D. Green than an account of the incident appeared on an Islamist Web site in the name of an insurgent group, the Mujahedeen Army. It promised "harsh punishment" for the alleged crime.

After three years of war, allegations of U.S. soldiers abusing civilians often draw more media attention in the United States than in Iraq. And they generate little more than perfunctory statements from Iraq's leaders, who depend on American troops for their political and physical survival.

However, such reports do serve to motivate insurgents, who seize upon them for propaganda value. The allegations also undermine public confidence in the U.S.-backed government and complicate America's hopes of reducing forces.

The alleged rape and murder of an Iraqi girl in Mahmoudiya and the killing of her father, mother and sister last March is just the latest case in point. Green was charged Monday in federal court in Charlotte, N.C., and up to four others still in uniform are under investigation in Iraq.

Such cases — both real and perceived — place Iraq's civilian leaders in a quandary.

On the one hand, Iraqi leaders cannot disregard the complaints of their own citizens and expect to maintain any credibility. That affects the United States, too, because it is anxious for the new Iraqi government to win public trust.

On the other hand, Iraqi leaders can't afford to criticize the U.S. military too much, and play into the hands of those who want to see American and other international forces leave soon.

In its Internet account of the Mahmoudiya case, the insurgent group implied that Iraqi authorities did not take the case seriously at first because the victims — like most insurgents — were Sunnis.

All that explains the measured public response of the Iraqi government to the Mahmoudiya case, as well as to other allegations, including claims that U.S. Marines killed about two dozen civilians in Haditha last November.

On Tuesday, Iraq's justice minister demanded that the U.N. Security Council ensure punishment for those guilty in the rape-slaying, branding the attack "monstrous and inhuman."

So far, however, no statement has been issued by Iraq's president or prime minister.

During an interview Sunday with CNN, the Iraqi industry minister, a Kurd, cautioned against drawing conclusions about the rape-slaying based on "purely speculative reports." He warned that the Mahmoudiya case "will be taken ... out of context" by "enemies of the friendly relations between Iraq and the United States."

The fallout over Mahmoudiya didn't stop President Jalal Talabani from warmly praising America, telling a Fourth of July reception at the U.S. Embassy that the world "always looked up to the United States for support in their just causes." Top figures from Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish parties were all in attendance.

Such words highlight the fact that many Iraqi officials — Shiites, Kurds and Sunnis alike — want the U.S. military to stay for now, and fear that an abrupt drawdown would leave the country in chaos and their own government unable to survive.

The fact that the Mahmoudiya allegations include rape is likely to stir a special sense of outrage in a religiously conservative society where women are sheltered and where sex outside of marriage can bring shame on entire families.

For years the insurgents have spread rumors — roundly denied by U.S. officials — of the systematic rape of Iraqi women held in U.S.-run jails. True or not, the Mahmoudiya case will be seen by many Iraqis as confirmation of those rumors.

"The rape of an Iraqi girl by a bunch of U.S. soldiers who stalked her house summarizes what has been going on in Iraq for the past years," said Iraq's biggest Sunni-owned newspaper, Azzaman, under a headline "The Rape of an Honest Woman."

Such comments, fair or not, resonate within a society where honor and pride are highly esteemed.

Indeed, many Iraqis — even those who see benefits in a continued U.S. military role here — consider the mere presence of foreign soldiers as an affront to their pride.

Such feelings are heightened by the countless petty indignities suffered daily by Iraqis — from delays at checkpoints and random searches of homes to perceived affronts at the hands of soldiers who do not speak their language or understand their culture.

"We disapprove of this shameful crime," one Baghdad resident, Saad Ali, said of the Mahmoudiya case.

"We ask the U.S. army in the name of humanity and especially in the name of Iraqi honor to leave Iraqi land."

___

How does this make you feel as an American citizen? as a human? as a woman?
I don't want to hear....well it is a war....that doesn't cut it for me.
 
ABSTRUSE said:
How does this make you feel as an American citizen? as a human? as a woman?
I don't want to hear....well it is a war....that doesn't cut it for me.
As an American: Embaressed. As a Human: Outraged As a woman: No comment
Rape is wrong, no matter the circumstance. If he did indeed do it, I think there should be a tall tree and a short peice of rope in his near future. By the same token, I'm a bit leary of news sources these days, I try to take what they say with a grain of salt, I just can't tell which way the stories are spinning anymore.
 
same shit different day. it just makes me want to move to europe even more.

*shrug*

being an american is pretty fucking embarrassing.
 
As an ex soldier I see news items like this and cringe. I never served in an occupied country so I can't comment on the pressures of being part of an occupying force. I can, however, comment on what I see as a gross generalisation.

In any group you have your good and your bad. The majority of the soldiers on duty in Iraq are kids trying to get through their tour of duty in one piece. They are trying their hardest in an impossible situation and sometimes they have to do things that go against thier beliefs and morals. They do it because right or wrong it's their job. Then you have the other group.

People like Steven Green. People who use the fact that they are an armed part of a large powerful occupying force to run amok and do whatever the hell they want. I know it's an unrealistic wish but I'd love to see the scumbags seperated in the media from the US Army as a whole. Steven Green is not the US Army. He is one man... definitely not representative of the US Army as a whole. I served in the New Zealand army and other organisations of a similar ilk. My only interest while overseas and on duty was to get home in one piece and do so without disgracing myself or my country/organisation. I gaurantee you that is all that is running through the mindsof 99.9% of the young men and women over in Iraq.

I have a few friends currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. On rare occasions I get to chat to them online. they all work for private organisations but they tell me that the prevailing condition for an "allied" serviceman or woman over there is confusion and fear. Confusion from not knowing which face in the crowd is going to pull a grenade out and try to kill them, and fear because you never know when you're gonna be hit. In that sort of climate how could anyone be expected to operate at 100%.

I'm definitely NOT making excuses for Green and his contemporaries. Everyone who has served in any armed force knows someone like Green. A bully with a rifle. But the fact that an army has people like that serving in it should not diminish the honour or intentof the whole organisation. The US Army is a very Honourable body.

Sorry if this has rambled. I just hate to see lables being wrongly assigned.

For the record I am against the war in Iraq and against the occupation. It is a needless waste of young lives. Bush's ego needs no more stroking... bring the kids home.

Thanks for putting up with my rant.

Shane
 
Trinique_Fire said:
same shit different day. it just makes me want to move to europe even more.

*shrug*

being an american is pretty fucking embarrassing.

You've got no reason to be embarrassed Trinique. I worked extensively with US servicemen and found them to be damned good people... not as good as kiwis of course but damned good.

Honour is a big thing with me. I never served with an American that didn't have honour. I know it sounds grandiose and old fashioned but I strongly believe that a man can be measured on his honour. Your average American serviceman is an incredible friend and an awesome soldier. You should never let the actions of pieces of shit like this Steven Green taint the whole apple barrel.

Shane
 
Outraged for the woman's sake.

We should have protected her.

However, it's not like anything we do is going to make things better with terrorists, it will only be spun to make things worse, and that is never ending. This is not a reasonable foe that cringes at murdering innocents.

I believe America's troops and army should have a higher standard than the terrorists. I believe on the whole the individuals do. But the government clearly is defending torture. And individual war crimes (what part of war isn't a crime?) will only point up more the fact that the premise of war itself is a justification to do violence for a cause. We're supposed to have a cause worth it. Freedom. The cause of the rape and murder is sickness and hatred.

Yes, she was raped. She was killed. Does this make her death any more heinous than the people bombed anonymously? No. Does it add insult to injury? Yes.
 
It makes me sad that people on all sides allow themselves to be so easily manipulated by such stories. A horrible crime was committed. The perpetrator was captured and will face justice and punishment. There is no more meaning or signifigance to this story than there is to a thousand similar stories that happen every year around the world. Using it to score political points is shameful, and inevitable as long as people allow themselves to be manipulated. Don't let yourself be manipulated, and don't try to manipulate others. Honorable people stick to reason, logic and evidence to make their point.
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
There is no more meaning or signifigance to this story than there is to a thousand similar stories that happen every year around the world.
I /intensely/ disagree.
 
ABSTRUSE said:
Because, due to its timing, the climate of the world, the people involved, and other circumstances, I think this incident does not lack meaning over the thousands of other cases of similar things that happen. I think that's blanketedly ridiculous.
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
Because, due to its timing, the climate of the world, the people involved, and other circumstances, I think this incident does not lack meaning over the thousands of other cases of similar things that happen. I think that's blanketedly ridiculous.
True, it does not lack meaning over the thousands of other cases of similar things that happen. But what was argued was that it don't have more meaning than other cases. Just to make sure...do you mean that it has more importance? or less? Or the same?

regards,
Liar, Governor of the State of Confusion
 
Last edited:
Joe Wordsworth said:
Because, due to its timing, the climate of the world, the people involved, and other circumstances, I think this incident does not lack meaning over the thousands of other cases of similar things that happen. I think that's blanketedly ridiculous.
I thought that's what you might mean. The "meaning" you refer to is all "imported," not intrinsic in the crime itself. Such "meaning" only exists to the extent that others want or allow it to. That is what I find sad, that so many do want it or allow it, manipulate or are manipulated. In itself, the story is just another meaningless tragedy, like countless others all the time, all over the world.

To be clear, I am not including you among the manipulators or manipulated. The thing that you are referring to as having meaning is the manipulation, which is meaningful in the various contexts you cite. The actual crime itself has none. What kind of crime would be intrinsically meaningful? My Lai is an example, or the Kaityn Forest.
 
Last edited:
ABSTRUSE said:
Murder case puts Iraqi gov't in quandary

...U.S. authorities filed rape and murder charges against ex-soldier Steven D. Green...

ABSTRUSE,
Despite you not buying the "war involves rape" and crimes, and not in any way to excuse the abuse of power, such action is very difficult to avoid completely.

Although people who are trained to fight are encouraged in very subtle ways to think of the enemy as faceless, fearless, non-humans who will kill you given the chance. No one actually says that in so many words, but the message is clear.

In this war (which I do not classify as a war reasons for that later if you like) is in many ways like the Viet Nam conflict. The enemy is a loosely organized, effective force that is convinced that God is on their side and that they can't lose given time.

They are submerged in a population that has very mixed feelings about the conflict and the greater situation. There are three major groups that are fighting each other for control of what each tend to regard as “their” country. It is very difficult to know every time who the “good guys” are.

The US and half a dozen other nations are there for altruistic reasons, but with hidden agendas as well. Our troops are all volunteers (although I’m guessing that most got something different from what they expected) and knew that there was a chance that they would use the training that they had received.

The men and women who have committed crimes and have been brought up on charges and have been found guilty are being punished. In almost every case, our troops know right from wrong and have behaved accordingly. Which is more than can be said for the enemy.

I know that it’s very rare to have charges brought without having a good case and at each step of the process; all parties involved have their rights carefully protected. The persons involved are considered innocent until proven guilty. Which is what we should be doing for Sgt Green and the others who are standing trial.

War crimes are acts that are committed during war, but are not a part of the war even though these acts are tangent to the conduct of the war. So even though war is a terrible and horrifying activity, it is not a criminal activity.

And yes I served in the US military in a country that we occupy (very loosely using the term). I have not fought in an insurgency.
 
Rape is rape is rape.

If this Sgt. Green did commit the rape and murder of the young woman then he should be handed over to the civil authorities in the country where these crimes were commited. (Yes he most likely would be treated inhumanly, but no less so than if he was handed over to my custody.)

There is no excuse for a crime of this type. None, end of story.

If he is innocent, then let him go free as well as make sure people know he is innocent. If he is guilty, then hand him over and let him face the consequences of his actions.

Cat
 
This proves we a re different. Many crimes happen during war and it is always hard to punish. Now the crime is being dealt with and that is what makes us different then our enemies and even our allies. With Iraq I often here of all the crimes which are actually few in number, but seldom is the fact that these soldiers are prosecuted and imprisoned.


We are the good guys and we are not perfect. The terrorists are people (I use the term losely) who support a society where women have no value. The military is putting a rapist and murderer on trial. I think that shows many positives. Namely that the US forces are not above the law and all citizens are important and are valued by society.
 
Rape is wrong. The criminal should be punished.

Having said that, I wonder how many women in Iraq are raped by the insurgents supposedly fighting to free the Iraqi people from American opression?

Funny we don't hear about those in the media. :confused:
 
Zeb_Carter said:
Rape is wrong. The criminal should be punished.

Having said that, I wonder how many women in Iraq are raped by the insurgents supposedly fighting to free the Iraqi people from American opression?

Funny we don't hear about those in the media. :confused:

I've heard it. Even rooms for it. It really is out there. Just like the X-Files said.
 
Recidiva said:
I've heard it. Even rooms for it. It really is out there. Just like the X-Files said.
Well then...where did you hear it, read it? Was it on the nightly news of you local channel? Was it on CNN? Was it printed in the New York Time?
 
Zeb_Carter said:
Well then...where did you hear it, read it? Was it on the nightly news of you local channel? Was it on CNN? Was it printed in the New York Time?

You haven't heard accounts of rape rooms, torture chambers, stuff like that?

Granted, some of that was Abu Gharib, but it's out there.
 
Recidiva said:
You haven't heard accounts of rape rooms, torture chambers, stuff like that?

Granted, some of that was Abu Gharib, but it's out there.
Old news...before we got there. Talking about now, today, last month.
 
Zeb_Carter said:
Old news...before we got there. Talking about now, today, last month.

Regardless of "old news" that doesn't mean there's a lack of news. It means that it's been covered before.

Rather like people not running down every event of Palestinian/Israeli hatred in every news piece. "Well, see, back 2000 years ago..."

Would make each sound bite much too hard to chew.
 
Recidiva said:
Regardless of "old news" that doesn't mean there's a lack of news. It means that it's been covered before.

Rather like people not running down every event of Palestinian/Israeli hatred in every news piece. "Well, see, back 2000 years ago..."

Would make each sound bite much too hard to chew.
But, those weren't done by the people I am talking about "NOW" those were utilized by those in power at the time...you remember Saddam?
 
Zeb_Carter said:
But, those weren't done by the people I am talking about "NOW" those were utilized by those in power at the time...you remember Saddam?

And you're sure...none of them are the same guys? Really? Not even a chance?
 
Recidiva said:
And you're sure...none of them are the same guys? Really? Not even a chance?
Pretty sure...I haven't finished my census of all the insurgence in country yet but so far they're not.
 
Zeb_Carter said:
Pretty sure...I haven't finished my census of all the insurgence in country yet but so far they're not.

Well, I'm sure if I could sit down with each one of them. Face to uncovered face. As a woman. They'd tell me true.
 
Back
Top