Point of view

From which point of view would you rather read in a story about sexual submission?

  • From a man's point of view

    Votes: 9 42.9%
  • From a woman's point of view

    Votes: 12 57.1%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
https://i3.cpcache.com/product/122456057/i_am_carbon_neutral_bumper_sticker.jpg?side=Front&color=White&height=460&width=460&qv=90 https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/t/old-man-drinking-water-glass-51481482.jpg
 
So Tim's face saving strategy is the old Ishtard "it was a trap" manoeuvre?

LOL. It never worked for him, either.
 
So Tim's face saving strategy is the old Ishtard "it was a trap" manoeuvre?

LOL. It never worked for him, either.

It only works in Star Wars anyway. Only carbon-based nerds know that though.
 
You know, I think Tim actually believes this to be true.

This thread rockets Timmy Three-Tries to the top of the standings in the 2021 Literotica GarbageCan Memorial True Believer competition.

Well done, Timmeh.
 
This thread rockets Timmy Three-Tries to the top of the standings in the 2021 Literotica GarbageCan Memorial True Believer competition.

Well done, Timmeh.

Group 2 must be desperate if they're dragging rubbery out of his Southern retirement to emulate rorbags' counting schtick.

Keep on engaging group 2, you're doing swell.
 
Group 2 must be desperate if they're dragging rubbery out of his Southern retirement to emulate rorbags' counting schtick.

Keep on engaging group 2, you're doing swell.

So much winning by Timmeh in this thread.

*nods*
 
Quit behaving like a bunch of group 2ers! Of course Timmeh is winning.

He’s glued and clamped wood together, wrote some stories, fished, can sail a boat, and as a self-proclaimed political savant, made tons of condescending posts where he successfully predicted the outcome of the US presidential election (he was right, really, just wait until August).
He was a jack-leg lawyer (now ‘retired’), was wrong about something once (but admitted it), changed the strap on his watch, knows more about Coronaviruses than scientists and epidemiologists from around the world who have studied them, and is obviously a leader in the field of hydrology.

He’s a true Renaissance Man. A modern Galileo. Just ask him, he’ll tell you. Repeatedly and smugly, while apologizing for your lagging behind the rest of the class.
 
.
This "Timmeh" of whom you speak sounds like quite a remarkable fellow.

:rolleyes: :D
 
Last edited:
Quit behaving like a bunch of group 2ers! Of course Timmeh is winning.

He’s glued and clamped wood together, wrote some stories, fished, can sail a boat, and as a self-proclaimed political savant, made tons of condescending posts where he successfully predicted the outcome of the US presidential election (he was right, really, just wait until August).
He was a jack-leg lawyer (now ‘retired’), was wrong about something once (but admitted it), changed the strap on his watch, knows more about Coronaviruses than scientists and epidemiologists from around the world who have studied them, and is obviously a leader in the field of hydrology.

He’s a true Renaissance Man. A modern Galileo. Just ask him, he’ll tell you. Repeatedly and smugly, while apologizing for your lagging behind the rest of the class.

You forgot internationally acclaimed IT expert and theology professor.
 
You forgot internationally acclaimed IT expert and theology professor.


Of course, yes....the list is just so long.


Ol’ derpy is definitely one with God (the Right one, not the brown one), and has probably most definitely had a hand in creating the internet.
 
Currently I'm plotting my next porn story and have run into a small dilemma.

The story can be told from the point of view of a woman or a man. The POV changes the plot a little bit, but not enough to make a meaningful difference, except possibly to the reader.



So, which POV would you prefer?

From the man's point of view? Or the woman's?


I did make the poll private so please vote and let me know what you want to read. My inbox is also open for those who aren't shy.


Maybe you can do one in which the views alternate? So one passage can be from the man's point of view, another from the woman's? That would be pretty cool. Then again, I'm not much of a writer, just offering an opinion.
 
Maybe you can do one in which the views alternate? So one passage can be from the man's point of view, another from the woman's? That would be pretty cool. Then again, I'm not much of a writer, just offering an opinion.



Possibly something I might do in a future story but not the current one. The current book is about 6000 words so far and our poor heroine is learning that the way she's been looking at the world her entire life was based on her parents protecting her from reality. Now she has to learn to deal with that reality as an adult and realize that there are people all around her having sex with each other at any given moment.

And then her car craps out on her on the way home.
 
Next to a couple having sex on the side of the road.

They were in the garage and he was getting a hummer.


But enough teasers, you wanna know what happens next you gotta wait for it.
 
I submit for the edification and amusement of the board, the most Scottyesque thread since Scotty left.
 
Yikes!

@HisArpy sent me off on a recent quest to investigate the mystery of why Carbon Water hounds him across numerous threads. I believe I have found the source using the 'Way Back Time Machine.' Who would have thought the origin began with an innocuous thread on writing from a woman's POV.

Not trying to offend, but I don't think you understand a woman's perspective enough to do it justice.

When you level an insult, even when saying it isn't, be prepared to get a reply that triggers your fake "you're so emotional" button.

The rest of your comment only illustrates to me that you haven't read anything I've written.

Ooh, this has Tim meltdown written all over it. Could you at least wait until half time in the match?

Fucker doesn't understand water. [dmallord bold added, here.]

What's not to understand? It's just 2 molecules of a volatile carbon based organic bonded with an oxydizer and maintained at a temperature which keeps it in a liquid state.

Or don't you know that? [dmallord: And here are the beginning of a three-year running commentary on carbon water!]

It's one molecule, three atoms and there's fuck all carbon involved, Tim. And it's not organic.

Educate yourself...

BTW dingbat, Hydrogen isn't one of the noble gasses. It's non metallic and it's also not silica. By default, that leaves carbon as the base for the atom. Unless you're going to tell us that there's another base that science doesn't know about which consists of the hydrogen atom alone.

As the coup de grace to your stupid insistence on ignorance, did you know that you can create hydrogen by dissolving charcoal (which is carbon) in acid?

HisArpy continues to stubbornly plow into deep science lookups, deflects about charcoal in acid, and delivers, or believes he does, the coup de grace of someone being stupid and ignorant.

He failed to read the tea leaves in his future. The carbon water stain continues to haunt him even to this very day.

Science teaches kids that water is not HisArphy's formula.

It is not two molecules of a volatile carbon-based organic. Water (H2O) is not a carbon-based compound; it consists of two hydrogen atoms bonded to one oxygen atom.

"Bonded with an oxydizer (sic)" isn't needed. It's a stable compound formed by covalent bonds between hydrogen and oxygen atoms.

"Maintained at a temperature which keeps it in a liquid state." This is accurate. Water typically exists in a liquid state at standard atmospheric pressure and temperatures between 0°C (32°F) and 100°C (212°F).

Arphy would not make a good science teacher. His formula for water contains inaccuracies, particularly regarding its composition and the mention of an oxidizer. Water is a simple molecule composed of hydrogen and oxygen, and it doesn't require an oxidizer to exist.

No wonder, the guy wanders around Lit carrying water like it is an albatross around his neck. Sad.
 
Back
Top