deezire1900
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2001
- Posts
- 595
I am looking for the meaning behind the 3 ying/yang type symbols that are chasing each other.
I should know...
I should know...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
deezire1900 said:I am looking for the meaning behind the 3 ying/yang type symbols that are chasing each other.
I should know...
Wizard said:Great answer s'lara !!! Well put....
![]()
s'lara said:i didn't write it Sir. There is a copyright at the bottom but i am unsure of the author.
lara
Etoile said:The author is Quagmyr@aol.com - the person who created it. The main page is here, with lots of information, pictures, links, yadda yadda yadda.
Pure said:The three fold variation of yang yin further suggests to me that the world needn't be seen as divided in two, as in two sexes,
s and m etc. Not everything is black or white. There is a third (hence a fourth, etc.) possibility. S and M are not opposites, anyway, according to some. Hence quagmyr's
Lastly it might be mentioned that the use of red has a linkage with blood, and red and black are traditionally a dark, even diabolic combination.
. [/B]
Howling_Ire said:acutaly i think you kinda missed the symoblism in the orgional ying yang... it was never ment imply that the worlds was only two things..it has to do with striveing of balance towards the postivie and negative... this is defined as male and female, in that it is viewed that the female is the negative force on the physical plane and the male the postive (before you start going, oh that's sexist! the female is in turn postive on the astral plane and the male negative, to achieve balance)
There is indeed a Norse version, although the better known version is Celtic. I believe that the Norse derived from Celtic influence but I am not positive of that and if anybody has some authoritative sources on the topic, I'd love to know of them. Either way, it consists of the rim and arms, with no dots or holes. It has had many meanings in Celtic lore and eventually became a symbol of the Trinity.thier is another symbol i am ware of that looks alot like this 3 pronged ying/yang but i am unfamalir with the name with it, or it's symbolic implications, i believe it's norse in orgin and symbolicly would have more to do with the western mysteries vrs the eastern.
"Thank you" and a chuckle.PinkOrchid said:Curious as to how people reply when asked something like "ooh, pretty necklace, what does it mean?"
Quagmyr said:I have one strategy but two different answers when I'm not sure that the person asking is one who should know the "inner meaning." The strategy is basically to load them up with more irrelevant information than they want until their eyes start to glaze over.
Originally (answer #1) I'd go into the history of Triskeles in general. I'd give them a spiel along the lines of "Oh, this is a combination of Celtic and Asian forms of the triskele. That's the name of the shape and it means "three-legged" for reasons that are pretty obvious. The originial Celtic triskele had many meanings, includingthe three faces of the goddess...blah blah blah...with the formation of the Celtic church became a symbol of the Trinity...yakkety yakkety yak...Often used in various schoolf of bBuddhism and Taoism.....yadda yadda...Okinawan martial arts...blather blather.
When I'd start to see them start to figet, I'd stop.
Nowadays, I'm fond of saying that it symbolizes the Three Elements. If they ask about the three elements ("I thought there were four, Earth Fire, Air and Water?") I go into my quantum mechanical mystic explanation that there are, ultimately, three elements -- Time, Space and Motion -- and they're all interconnected to form the material universe and the energy which is the basis of all matter. Time is the measure of motion through space, Space is the measure of motion over time and and Motion is space devided by time. The holes represent the void, from which they spring in a sort of quantum flux.
I get the glassy eyes pretty quickly with that one. Oddly enough, it's also quite philosophically valid![]()