Peyton Manning

The Beloved Redskins should snap up Tebow.
I am not a Tebow fan but I think picking him up would be a wise move for any team in need of a good QB and with the patience to let him make a few mistakes. The Skins always need a good QB but they have zero patience.
 
Very funny! With all the innuendo and implications noted.

Motorcycle riders in CA used to be called organ donors. Amazed me they'd scream by on the line between lanes/cars. When the helmet law went in to effect the hospitals were hurting for transplant volunteers.
 
The SB comment was about Super Bowls. It wasn't about anything else. You're trying to make it about whole seasons and playoffs, it was in response to a comment about Super Bowls. Hence his Super Bowl record.
I said they'd have to trade for good draft picks if Manning does as well as hoped. Is that wrong? Last I knew it's how the league worked.
You're trying to make my comments some kind of anti-Manning thing, they're not. They're anti-short term thinking.

First off, Tebow isn't a good quarterback. He's a good runner, but he has an absolutely terrible arm. He's inaccurate and he has a poor throwing motion.

Pink's point was that Denver has a better chance of making it to the playoffs with Manning rather than Tebow. She's right. He's a far better QB than Tebow will ever be.


As far as the draft picks issue goes, you said that if they get Manning they will be a better team and therefore, pick later in the draft than if they kept Tebow. While that is true, you seem to be implying that they should keep Tebow to be able to draft higher which is assinine. Of course, if that's not what you meant then I wish you would articulate it more clearly.
 
First off, Tebow isn't a good quarterback. He's a good runner, but he has an absolutely terrible arm. He's inaccurate and he has a poor throwing motion.

Pink's point was that Denver has a better chance of making it to the playoffs with Manning rather than Tebow. She's right. He's a far better QB than Tebow will ever be.


As far as the draft picks issue goes, you said that if they get Manning they will be a better team and therefore, pick later in the draft than if they kept Tebow. While that is true, you seem to be implying that they should keep Tebow to be able to draft higher which is assinine. Of course, if that's not what you meant then I wish you would articulate it more clearly.

I said if Manning is as successful as they hope they'll get high draft picks and have to trade to get a draft shot at a good QB that they will need in a couple years. If Tebow stayed it becomes much less of an issue since they presumably won't need a new QB for some time and therefore have time to cultivate one or make less damaging trades. I articulated it just fine, you just read more into it than there was.
Pinks comment was about the Super Bowl. She said maybe Denver thought Tebow could only get them to the playoffs but not the SB. I responded with a comment about Manning and the Super Bowl. Once again you're reading something that isn't there. Nobody said Tebow was as good as Manning or had a better chance of winning the SB. You keep thinking I'm saying that Tebow is as good or better than Manning and I have not. My point is that he is a long term QB and Manning is not. I have made that abundantly clear throughout this thread and everyone knows that but you apparently.
 
The business part of this deal is that Denver can afford to front end the Peyton cap hit. They can buy a chunk of it this year. They are relatively flush as it is and... available talent will flock. Not a lot of things to fix.
 
The business part of this deal is that Denver can afford to front end the Peyton cap hit. They can buy a chunk of it this year. They are relatively flush as it is and... available talent will flock. Not a lot of things to fix.

Yeah, they'll get all kinds of talent wanting to play for them right now. Remains to be seen if they put together a proper team instead of Redskins II or if Manning is back to form. Fun either way I guess.
 
I said if Manning is as successful as they hope they'll get high draft picks and have to trade to get a draft shot at a good QB that they will need in a couple years. If Tebow stayed it becomes much less of an issue since they presumably won't need a new QB for some time and therefore have time to cultivate one or make less damaging trades. I articulated it just fine, you just read more into it than there was.
Pinks comment was about the Super Bowl. She said maybe Denver thought Tebow could only get them to the playoffs but not the SB. I responded with a comment about Manning and the Super Bowl. Once again you're reading something that isn't there. Nobody said Tebow was as good as Manning or had a better chance of winning the SB. You keep thinking I'm saying that Tebow is as good or better than Manning and I have not. My point is that he is a long term QB and Manning is not. I have made that abundantly clear throughout this thread and everyone knows that but you apparently.

You really think that they should keep a crappy QB (Tebow) for a few years so they can draft higher rather than get one of the best just so they can draft one? Seroiusly? That's simply bat shit crazy.

I think you're the only one who thinks Tebow is a long term QB. Maybe a long term bad QB but not a good one. Again, I think Pink was right. Period.
 
Yeah, they'll get all kinds of talent wanting to play for them right now. Remains to be seen if they put together a proper team instead of Redskins II or if Manning is back to form. Fun either way I guess.
It is fun, either way. He's not a runner. Fewer hits. And he's a commodity... even fewer hits. He'll do great. He'll melt plastic.
 
You really think that they should keep a crappy QB (Tebow) for a few years so they can draft higher rather than get one of the best just so they can draft one? Seroiusly? That's simply bat shit crazy.

I think you're the only one who thinks Tebow is a long term QB. Maybe a long term bad QB but not a good one. Again, I think Pink was right. Period.

No, I said that draft picks were one aspect of a long term plan. I never said keep a bad QB just for draft picks. You keep doing that. Don't.
I didn't say Pink was wrong, I said Mannings SB record is not stellar.
 
It is fun, either way. He's not a runner. Fewer hits. And he's a commodity... even fewer hits. He'll do great. He'll melt plastic.

I don't know the Denver front line all that well. I assume if they have holes they'll get them fixed for Peyton. They'll have to if they want him around for more than a game.
Like Tebow I'll hold off judgement until I see Manning play again. It's been over a year and if anyone can not play for a year and still be great it's Manning but it's been over a year.
 
Brady, who will be donning his usual Patriots uniform, alluded to the future battle in the hours after Manning’s news conference.

“I have a lot of respect for Peyton Manning as a person and as a player,” Brady said in a statement released on his Facebook page. “He is a great role model and always puts the team first. And he is a great leader and representative for the NFL. Like always, it will be fun to compete against him this year when the New England Patriots [team stats] play the Denver Broncos.”

...When Broncos executive vice president John Elway was introducing Manning to a packed news conference at the Broncos facility, making clear that the future Hall of Famer had chosen Denver ahead of San Francisco and Tennessee, his language was specific.

“My goal is to make Peyton Manning the greatest quarterback who’s ever played the game,” Elway said.

...The schedule-makers, thankfully, were kind. Regardless of Manning’s final choices, they would have played the Patriots. But the way it turned out, the Broncos visit the Pats in Gillette Stadium at a date to be determined.

Rivalry stays the same

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/...8&format=&page=1&listingType=pats#articleFull
 
To review:

1) Mark Sanchez practically imploded going into the latter half of last season. The Jets missed the playoffs;

2) The Jets hired Tony Sparano and his 'ground-and-pound' style as OC, moving the offense away from Sanchez' arm;

3) The Jets then reward Sanchez with a very lucrative contract;

4) The Jets trade for Tebow, a sub-par QB.


Conclusion: 2012 will be the coach and GM's last season with the Jets.
 
WOW..... Tebow.... yeah..still not gonna be a Jets fan.


*okay..maybe I will watch.
 
WOW..... Tebow.... yeah..still not gonna be a Jets fan.


*okay..maybe I will watch.

HBO should do their training camp show with the Jets again. Have Sanchez and Tebow room together, and show close ups of Tebows face every time Rex cusses....
 
HBO should do their training camp show with the Jets again. Have Sanchez and Tebow room together, and show close ups of Tebows face every time Rex cusses....

He is so gonna change.. He'll be giving out football care packages...:D
 
The Broncos will do terrible. Manning isn't the same as he was. He should
have retired.
 
Filed under "This Just Gets Better", evidently the Jets agreed to the terms of the Tebow trade without fully understanding that they're responsible for salary totaling ~$5M already paid to Tebow by the Broncos.

The Jets have balked at this term and the trade is now up in the air.


ETA: The Jags are now back in on the Tebow lottery...


....I am not making this up.
 
Last edited:
:)

Pay up, bitches!

The kids has to be worth 5 mil. Come on. Just sign the fucking thing already.
 
:)

Pay up, bitches!

The kids has to be worth 5 mil. Come on. Just sign the fucking thing already.

$5 million is the least they could pay him for having to put up with Rex the foul-mouthed *Footy Fucker* and Mark Sanchez boisting about his sex romps with teenaged girls, not to mention their intense fan-base!

Hello!
 
hopefully it'll knock sanchez off his pedestal. he's incredibly mediocre and he seems to have no idea of that obvious fact.
 
Back
Top