sr71plt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Posts
- 51,872
The governor selects the board of visitors. That's what I was talking about. In my opinion, the further you can separate state politics from universities, the better. I understand that this isn't 100% possible in the case of public universities, but I mentioned it because I don't think having Penn State more under the control of Pennsylvania politics would make the situation any better.
But yes, I agree, the governor of VA should have stepped in earlier . . . but it should never have happened in the first place, and might not have happened if the governor hadn't had sole power to hand-pick the visitors.
At the heart of the UVa problem is big bucks donors--needed now because the state isn't stepping up to pay its supposed share of running a state school.
(And it was the governor of the other party who picked the rector who went rogue--four years ago.)
The governor doesn't have sole power, by the way. The governor proposes; the legislature confirms (we're hoping that one of his new appointments--the old rector--gets canned by the legislature). That's still state government, but it isn't a single person. There's one good result of the UVa fiasco. The governor was forced to appoint some new board members on merit and competence rather than bank checks.
