On the subject of fairness:

How can straight people claim that gays don't form stable relationships, if they aren't ALLOWED to form stable relationships?
 
As the official spokesman for straight people; WE DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR ANGST and if we help you out you'll fuck us in some way. So it sux to be you.
 
We need a new reality TV show....

As the official spokesman for straight people; WE DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR ANGST and if we help you out you'll fuck us in some way. So it sux to be you.

I'd vote Jay BJ off the "straight island" if there was one. Perhaps we can all create one and vote Jay BJ onto it.
 
As the official spokesman for straight people; WE DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR ANGST and if we help you out you'll fuck us in some way. So it sux to be you.
You can't be an official spokesman for the straight people unless you are getting rich off of them. And you-- you are poor and impotent.

But it's true; majorities never offer equality to minorities until they are somehow forced to. And that enforcement, which began with the stonewall riots in 1969, is in process now.
 
I'd vote Jay BJ off the "straight island" if there was one. Perhaps we can all create one and vote Jay BJ onto it.

Oh, sooner or later one of these knuckle walkers will attribute a cure to Elvis, you'll differ, and off the island you go.
 
How mant Americans actually believe what the Constitution has to say...

Ted Olson makes a very interesting comment about why he is doing what he is doing.

My involvement in this case has generated a certain degree of consternation among conservatives. How could a politically active, lifelong Republican, a veteran of the Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush administrations, challenge the "traditional" definition of marriage and press for an "activist" interpretation of the Constitution to create another "new" constitutional right?

My answer to this seeming conundrum rests on a lifetime of exposure to persons of different backgrounds, histories, viewpoints, and intrinsic characteristics, and on my rejection of what I see as superficially appealing but ultimately false perceptions about our Constitution and its protection of equality and fundamental rights.


Olson seems to be taking on Proposition 8 because it discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation. As a conservative, he believes in civil rights, equal rights and doesn't exclude the right of people to marry whom they want to marry just because it goes against a perceived view of what is "normal".

America, as a country came about, in part, because of this...

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

As for what he sees as a superficially appealing but ultimately false perceptions about our Constitution and its protection of equality and fundamental rights, perhaps he has this in mind....

ARTICLE [IX.]
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


The way I read this, Olson puts the quotation marks around the word new, in the phrase create another "new" constitutional right because no new right to same-sex marriage is called for. Article [IX] already has it covered.

If Americans actually take their Declaration of Independence and their Constitution seriously, Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. All people, including gays have the right to equality under the law and their fundamental rights. A law that prohibits same-sex marriage denies those rights.
 
Bull shit, STEVE.

Children have no right to drive or marry or make contracts or consent to sex, etc.

Society can do whatever it pleases, and the knuckle walkers can shuffle on up to Canada.
 
Who is dying, jimmy, that you need to come here and spew hatred and misery day after day?

It's not a who, it's a what, and it died a very long time ago.


Sometime, far in the past, he missed out on a prize he thought was deserved and never recovered.
 
Put me on ignore, then.
Answer the question; What made you into the caricature of a miserable little man? What is it, that makes you conflate adult pastimes with children and animals?

I'm thinking you were sexually abused as a child yourself, in fact. Everything you say points that way-- denials, uncontrollable rages and self-pity, all the "You made me do it" statements...
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking you were sexually abused as a child yourself, in fact. Everything you say points that way-- denials, uncontrollable rages and self-pity, all the "You made me do it" statements...

I'm sorry, but if I was JBJ now, I would give you a pissed off answer now.
 
And that would differ from his other posts in what way? :confused:

None. That's why.

I was long enough into political discussions as a sport, I know the ways trolls go. Posts as appetite for destruction.

And be honest - how would you answer if somebody ask you "why are you so adopted ?"
 
Pssst STELLA?

Dont give up your day job to be a fortune teller.
 
I'm sorry, but if I was JBJ now, I would give you a pissed off answer now.
Works both ways-- I gave up talking to jimmyturdjohnson a long time ago.

I am, of course, playing to the peanut gallery. It's easy, and mildly satisfying, to remind my friends here that the man is an impotent turd.
And be honest - how would you answer if somebody ask you "why are you so adopted ?"
You are seeing my responses to that question right here. Any time it seems that someone has less than complete hostility towards him, jimmydick gets to work to rebuild the hatred.

Seriously, he exhibits all the signs of unresolved childhood post traumatic syndrome.
 
Works both ways-- I gave up talking to jimmyturdjohnson a long time ago.

I am, of course, playing to the peanut gallery. It's easy, and mildly satisfying, to remind my friends here that the man is an impotent turd. You are seeing my responses to that question right here. Any time it seems that someone has less than complete hostility towards him, jimmydick gets to work to rebuild the hatred.

Seriously, he exhibits all the signs of unresolved childhood post traumatic syndrome.

You know, hon, for an atheist you manage a remarkably Christian attitude. :kiss::kiss::kiss:;)
 
Back
Top