oggbashan

[underguy1]

Money creation in the modern economy - Quarterly Bulletin article
Bank of England



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvRAqR2pAgw

I expect you can easily refute the Bank of England, given your previous comments.

 

[underguy1]

Money creation in the modern economy - Quarterly Bulletin article
Bank of England



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvRAqR2pAgw

I expect you can easily refute the Bank of England, given your previous comments.

Bump.

 

[oggbashan]

I don't need to.

If you understood that video, you would know it supports what I have been saying.

But your understanding of economics is very limited, and wrong.

End of Thread.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You fucking scored...



I also won a tribute thread and caused him to go angry-crazy when I used the proper definition of inflation.

 

[underguy1]

I don't need to.

If you understood that video, you would know it supports what I have been saying.

But your understanding of economics is very limited, and wrong.

End of Thread.

How so?

In actual fact, it directly contradicts your assertions.

It appears that you are not just a pompous ignoramus but a bald faced liar with it.

 

[Disgustipated]

You fucking scored...



I also won a tribute thread and caused him to go angry-crazy when I used the proper definition of inflation.

Your pists in the doom thread refute that you understand anything when it comes to the economy, stupid.

 

[underguy1]

You fucking scored...



I also won a tribute thread and caused him to go angry-crazy when I used the proper definition of inflation.

That's another fantasy. You've completely failed to define inflation in any coherent sense.

And when challenged you avoid.

Idiot.

 

[oggbashan]

How so?

In actual fact, it directly contradicts your assertions.

It appears that you are not just a pompous ignoramus but a bald faced liar with it.

You still don't understand. You don't understand the link you posted.

Bye.

 

[Hashfag45]

That's another fantasy. You've completely failed to define inflation in any coherent sense.

And when challenged you avoid.

Idiot.

So now you're signing your posts like ishmael?

 

[underguy1]

You still don't understand. You don't understand the link you posted.

Bye.

Then explain it.

 

[oggbashan]

Then explain it.

No one can explain it to YOU.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Then explain it.

Why should he?

You deserve no better treatment than what you dish out......which at this point would be him calling you a bunch of names.

 

[underguy1]

No one can explain it to YOU.

You can't explain your own assertions.

Pathetic nonce.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No one can explain it to YOU.

Why should he?

You deserve no better treatment than what you dish out......which at this point would be him calling you a bunch of names.

Spot on Gentlemen.

Carry on...

 

[oggbashan]

These apply to underguy1:

Methink’st thou art a general offence and every man should beat thee.

You starvelling, you eel-skin, you dried neat’s-tongue, you bull’s-pizzle, you stock-fish–O for breath to utter what is like thee!-you tailor’s-yard, you sheath, you bow-case, you vile standing tuck!

 

[oggbashan]

I can't explain my own assertions.

I'm a pathetic nonce.

Fixed your post for you.

 

[Conager]

I can't explain my own assertions.

I'm a pathetic nonce.

:nods:

If you can't explain something to a layman, you don't understand it yourself.

Perhaps you should seek out a new field of study.

 

[Conager]

Fixed your post for you.

Great minds. . .

 

[Comshaw]

How so?

In actual fact, it directly contradicts your assertions.

It appears that you are not just a pompous ignoramus but a bald faced liar with it.

You still don't understand. You don't understand the link you posted.

Bye.

I see you have acquired wisdom over the years, IE:

Never argue with an idiot. All you do is frustrate yourself and piss of the idiot.

Or to be a bit more colorful:

Comshaw