Obedience at Work

writtenword

Really Experienced
Joined
Apr 28, 2003
Posts
245
Female submissives should be taught to obey even when they are not physically tethered. The master should email or make a phone call at work that gives instructions on what the master wants to see. For example, instruct your submissive to go the womens bathroom and remove her bra and panties and throw them in the garbage. Force her to walk around all day being stared at by her coworkers. When she is at her desk, instruct her to allow her skirt to ride up her waist. Let her blush and feel embarassed when men realize they can see what's between her legs. Let her become excited as she walks around braless. Each step causes her breasts to sway. When she is safely in her bindings have her recount the days events.
 
Okay, I think you're in fantasy zone here. Firstly, that would be rather expensive in terms of underwear. Secondly, submissive or not, she probably still needs to keep her job.

I am happy with the idea of instructing a submissive to go to work with no underwear and a skirt, or to wear something in her cunt and/or arse while she's there, or to ensure she cums every two hours... all of that can be done discreetly without challenging her job.
 
Muh gurlfriend works at the Peep Show

When she is at her desk, instruct her to allow her skirt to ride up her waist. Let her blush and feel embarassed when men realize they can see what's between her legs.
LOLOL uh yeah... getting right on that!




oops, did I do that out loud?
 
Re: Re: Obedience at Work

FungiUg said:
Okay, I think you're in fantasy zone here. Firstly, that would be rather expensive in terms of underwear. Secondly, submissive or not, she probably still needs to keep her job.

I am happy with the idea of instructing a submissive to go to work with no underwear and a skirt, or to wear something in her cunt and/or arse while she's there, or to ensure she cums every two hours... all of that can be done discreetly without challenging her job.

As a sub, I have to agree with FungiUg. A D/s relationship is baised on trust. I don't feel as though I could place any trust in someone that may put me knowingly into a harmful situation. I see that as harmful because it could have reprocussions such as loosing one's job, loosing a credible reputation in the work place, plus it could prevoke sexual harrasment, ect...

It would put a sub in a very difficult situation. Disobey Master, or loose income to support one's self. perhaps there are more discrete or proffesional ways to remind a sub at work as FungiUg pointed out

Thank you
 
I agree... you're living in a fantasy zone.. My past Sirs have required that I dont wear underwear when I go out, when wearing a skirt, and I've been told not to masturbate by my current Sir, without his permission first... and when I do masturbate, I am to tell him all the details of thought and action in a PM.

Asking her to flaunt herself like that at a job is rather unrealistic, and I agree about it being expensive.

The other thing that I have something of a problem with in your post is that you are saying how things SHOULD be, as if you believe every Dominant/submissive situation should have that kind of behaviour in it. Any Dom/me will tailor his/her requirements to his/her submissive, realizing that not every submissive is capable of the things that other submissives are capable of.

It's like saying that every submissive should be able to bend themselves like a pretzel, when clearly some people are incapable of it. Some people are just not capable of wandering around with no undergarments on.
 
writtenword said:
Female submissives should be taught to obey even when they are not physically tethered. The master should email or make a phone call at work that gives instructions on what the master wants to see. For example, instruct your submissive to go the womens bathroom and remove her bra and panties and throw them in the garbage. Force her to walk around all day being stared at by her coworkers. When she is at her desk, instruct her to allow her skirt to ride up her waist. Let her blush and feel embarassed when men realize they can see what's between her legs. Let her become excited as she walks around braless. Each step causes her breasts to sway. When she is safely in her bindings have her recount the days events.

Hello, i just could not resist this one.....

i have 'disciplines' that i do everyday, alot of them i do in public, but in a private way. For instance, i wear a butt plug to the grocery store, or my panties harnessed up my ass and 'cunt' when visiting my parents. These are things i do for Him, to please Him, but He would never want me to feel humiliated in front of my family, or make me lose my job to please Him.

i mean no disrespect, and if Your submissive is willing to do this for You, and take the risk of losing her job, or being personally attacked for doing something that society would deem offensive or even illegal, more power to You, and her, it is just not for me. And though i will not speak for Master, i am certain that He would never do anything that would hurt me or tramatize me in any way, such as inviting such open and public ridicule, or the lose of my job.

It is like FungiUg said a great fantasy, but no very practical as it applies to real life.
 
vixenshe said:
oh, and PS: Why only FEMALE submissives?

Actually, I know someone from the Auckland BDSM group who has similar requirements. For example, instead of wearing no underwear while at work, he has to wear womens underwear. Things like that.

So it's not just a female only thing.
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Obedience at Work

FungiUg said:
Okay, I think you're in fantasy zone here. Firstly, that would be rather expensive in terms of underwear. Secondly, submissive or not, she probably still needs to keep her job.

I am happy with the idea of instructing a submissive to go to work with no underwear and a skirt, or to wear something in her cunt and/or arse while she's there, or to ensure she cums every two hours... all of that can be done discreetly without challenging her job.

I agree...although I am submissive my job is very conservative. Master does email me and give me instructions I am to carry out throughout the day.
 
Great, another reason why I can never get good customer service.

It explains a lot, actually. I think the people I deal with on a regular basis are at their desks playing with themselves all day.
 
Netzach said:
Great, another reason why I can never get good customer service.

It explains a lot, actually. I think the people I deal with on a regular basis are at their desks playing with themselves all day.

eh, i'd always wondered about that

"please hold", my round-womanly-ass mutter...mutter..
 
T has had me go to work braless--but I'm a waitress at a restaurant where such things will only get me appreciation, not fired. He took this into account before issuing the command and would not have asked it of me in any situation where I would not be completely safe. Because I know this of him, I know I can trust him enough to obey such commands in the future. If I were put into a perilous situation like the one you described, even if I obeyed that once, it would be much harder for me to trust T and obey him in future commands. He would not be showing his concern for my well-being and there is no reason to obey someone like that.

I do enjoy being given random and challenging tasks similar to the one you described, but I'm heavily into humiliation. Many submissives are not, and such a scene might push them into a seriously uncomfortable mental place where their dominant would not be there to ease them through it. I find this unfair. In short, this is not a fantasy that all dominants "should" employ--in fact, I would opt for the opposite to be safe. Which is why we're all here, right?
 
writtenword said:
Female submissives should be taught to obey even when they are not physically tethered. The master should email or make a phone call at work that gives instructions on what the master wants to see. For example, instruct your submissive to go the womens bathroom and remove her bra and panties and throw them in the garbage. Force her to walk around all day being stared at by her coworkers. When she is at her desk, instruct her to allow her skirt to ride up her waist. Let her blush and feel embarassed when men realize they can see what's between her legs. Let her become excited as she walks around braless. Each step causes her breasts to sway. When she is safely in her bindings have her recount the days events.

Umm.. right.... This assumes a lot. It assumes that all submissives are female or that male subs are exempt from such training. It assumes that such behavior would not result in termination or punitive action.

*remaining reply is censored due to excessive sarcasm and extreme rudeness*
 
FungiUg said:
Actually, I know someone from the Auckland BDSM group who has similar requirements. For example, instead of wearing no underwear while at work, he has to wear womens underwear. Things like that.

So it's not just a female only thing.

No, it is not just a female thing.

I have my submissive do things on his lunch break, often in the restroom, and report details back to me. I would never consider placing him in a position of job loss. That is unacceptable. It would be going against my oath to protect him.

We have not had the opportunity to put our skills to the test, but we intend to appear straight vanilla when around his business partners and certain members of my family. If he does a bit more for me than other men do for their women, it is praised because he is just doting over his disabled woman. Men should dote, disabled woman or not.
 
Netzach said:
Great, another reason why I can never get good customer service.

It explains a lot, actually. I think the people I deal with on a regular basis are at their desks playing with themselves all day.

LOL....sorry that was just too funny, had to laugh. :)

:rose:~His Flower~:rose:
 
Well, let's be honest - it does serve a purpose.


A recently unemployed female submissive who has permanently lost her license to practice (numerous careers if we are to consider that not all female subs work customer service or answer telephones) is going to have a whole lot of time to serve as Master's vaginal fishing pole holder. ;)
 
lark sparrow said:
Well, let's be honest - it does serve a purpose.


A recently unemployed female submissive who has permanently lost her license to practice (numerous careers if we are to consider that not all female subs work customer service or answer telephones) is going to have a whole lot of time to serve as Master's vaginal fishing pole holder. ;)


LMAO-- just spit diet sprite all over the pc screen, but well worth it!! :D
 
y'all missed my point about my "only FEMALE submissives" comment.

I meant that the originator of this thread excluded males, and so I was asking whether he/she/it believed that ONLY women should be subjected to such training, or that men should endure it as well.

My point was the oversight that men are submissives as well.
 
vixenshe said:

My point was the oversight that men are submissives as well.

I agree.

I was simply stating the submissive's gender doesn't matter. The dominant would logically not jeopardize the sub's job. It is not a part of sane.
 
A mixed bag

As the originator of the thread I like to say thanks to all of you for your responses. I can see your point about risking your submissives job. However, there are already women who don't wear any undergarments at work and probably not engaged in bondage at all. As for specifying only female submissives, I'm not interested in being a submissive in a relationship. I see things from a dominant's perspective. And since I'm not gay, I don't fantasize about being a dominant to a guy.
 
Re: A mixed bag

writtenword said:
As the originator of the thread I like to say thanks to all of you for your responses. I can see your point about risking your submissives job. However, there are already women who don't wear any undergarments at work and probably not engaged in bondage at all.

Yup, too true. There's quite a difference between not wearing underwear and deliberately flashing though.

writtenword said:
As for specifying only female submissives, I'm not interested in being a submissive in a relationship. I see things from a dominant's perspective. And since I'm not gay, I don't fantasize about being a dominant to a guy.

Er, it's also possible for a guy to be submissive to a woman. Quite possible! Chuckle.
 
writtenword said:
This is true..but I rather wield the whip than taste the sting.

You and me both, buddy! I just can't take it seriously... end up laughing my head off. Which somehow I suspect isn't the desired response.
 
writtenword said:
For example, instruct your submissive to go the womens bathroom and remove her bra and panties and throw them in the garbage. Force her to walk around all day being stared at by her coworkers. When she is at her desk, instruct her to allow her skirt to ride up her waist. Let her blush and feel embarassed when men realize they can see what's between her legs.

Oh yeah. I'm sooooo with you there! But...

Along with your fantasty is your sub's fantasy. That you should totally support her financially and the "job" is just to be able to carry out your fantasy. Of course, you SHOULD work there too (perhaps in housekeeping?) to ensure her safety. You also SHOULD be making her car payments, housing arrangements, covering child care costs while she is living out your fantasies, food costs, health insurance/copays, and entertainment outside of your personal sex fantasies. You SHOULD also provide her with the tools for her personal hobbies that don't involve you as well as any other typical needs for people in our society.
Oh, and I am thinking that your janatorial job would be your 2nd job since it is just for fantasy, right?
 
vixenshe said:
oh, and PS: Why only FEMALE submissives?

I can answer that one.

Cause a Domme would never be so gauche as to have her submissive risk his livelihood for bullshit.

My subs are successful and in some cases affluent men. I would be crazy to have them do something detrimental to themselves and to Me because my subs' success(es) reflects on Me (and my good taste/sense) also.
 
Back
Top