Obama the warmonger.

underguy1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Posts
2,857
But as President, Obama was, regardless of how many Nobel Peace Prizes he was awarded, anything but the peacenik he had campaigned as. In fact, when he exits office, he will do so as the only President to ever be at war for every minute of his two terms. He approved military action in no less than 7 countries, overseeing a cumulative military budget that not only exceeded President Bush, but was the largest since World War Two. And in ushering in the drone attack era, authorizing twice as many of these attacks in his first year as President Bush did over his entire presidency, he brought the reality of a daily life of unimaginable terror to countless civilians across the globe. It is not preposterous to assert that President Obama is not only a more prodigious warmonger than President Bush, but than any President in history.

President Obama’s “Now Watch This Drive” Moment



Frightening to think that La Clinton will almost certainly be worse.
 
You hush Bush is the most evil white man of all time, Obama is perfect, he's (D) AND black.

Say you love him or you're a RACIST!! :mad::mad:
 
But as President, Obama was, regardless of how many Nobel Peace Prizes he was awarded, anything but the peacenik he had campaigned as. In fact, when he exits office, he will do so as the only President to ever be at war for every minute of his two terms. He approved military action in no less than 7 countries, overseeing a cumulative military budget that not only exceeded President Bush, but was the largest since World War Two. And in ushering in the drone attack era, authorizing twice as many of these attacks in his first year as President Bush did over his entire presidency, he brought the reality of a daily life of unimaginable terror to countless civilians across the globe. It is not preposterous to assert that President Obama is not only a more prodigious warmonger than President Bush, but than any President in history.

President Obama’s “Now Watch This Drive” Moment



Frightening to think that La Clinton will almost certainly be worse.
So NATO had nothing to do with the Libyan Civil War?
 
So NATO had nothing to do with the Libyan Civil War?

Of course, France and Italy wanted to get the oil and couldn't afford the fuel to bomb in Libya or over come the air defenses so they convinced Hillary to "Help the poor people of Libya" by kicking Mumar to the curb. Obama went a long because Hillary knows more Foreign stuff that he did, right? Of course she does/ Ha Ha Ha.
 
Yesterday, Obama was NATO's lapdog. Today, he's a warrior mastermind. Stupid game is correct.

Well obviously I've said neither of these things so you're just being dishonest again.

I don't understand the sort of mind that plays the strawman game.

What is it that you think is worth winning that you'll debase yourself with silly lies?

I honestly don't get the mindset.
 
Obama and Maya Angelou made the Nobel a joke.

But, Jim, when Maya Angelou died, you declared she's be forgotten and never mentioned again within a week, and here you are both remembering her and mentioning her long after she's gone. :D
 
Obama doesn't holda match to that murderer LBJ. LBJ not only sent massive amounts of troops into Vietnam while Kennedy was only sending in advisors, but he and McNamara lied to Congress and the American people to get Congress to allow him to send troops into Vietnam. LBJ's wife's family got richer while we were in Vietnam as they owned interests in the company that build part of our naval and air bases.
 
Well obviously I've said neither of these things so you're just being dishonest again.

I don't understand the sort of mind that plays the strawman game.

What is it that you think is worth winning that you'll debase yourself with silly lies?

I honestly don't get the mindset.
You did say that Obama has sent US military into seven countries without providing any details, like who they were fighting (ISIL).
 
Nah I'm pretty sure UG1 is right....this is just the kinda dishonesty you libertarians engage in.
 
You did say that Obama has sent US military into seven countries without providing any details, like who they were fighting (ISIL).

So, you're already walking your lie backwards.

The 'detail' is irrelevant to whether or not you are a dishonest strawman builder.

And as if the US is fighting ISIL/ISIS/Whatever Langley is calling their boys this week.

Let's face it, you're carrying water for one warmonger and war criminal after another.

While pretending to be a progressive.

As I said, I don't get the mindset.
 
But as President, Obama was, regardless of how many Nobel Peace Prizes he was awarded, anything but the peacenik he had campaigned as. In fact, when he exits office, he will do so as the only President to ever be at war for every minute of his two terms. He approved military action in no less than 7 countries, overseeing a cumulative military budget that not only exceeded President Bush, but was the largest since World War Two. And in ushering in the drone attack era, authorizing twice as many of these attacks in his first year as President Bush did over his entire presidency, he brought the reality of a daily life of unimaginable terror to countless civilians across the globe. It is not preposterous to assert that President Obama is not only a more prodigious warmonger than President Bush, but than any President in history.

President Obama’s “Now Watch This Drive” Moment



Frightening to think that La Clinton will almost certainly be worse.

I see now. You aren't actually standing by these words. You just post what you read or listen to.

You don't believe that Obama attacked seven countries. You only posted what others believe, like an idiot parrot.
 
I see now. You aren't actually standing by these words. You just post what you read or listen to.

You don't believe that Obama attacked seven countries. You only posted what others believe, like an idiot parrot.



funny how your kind fails to see how that obama destroyed the middle east with it's ignorant and inept leadership. clearly, Iraq needs to be studied so that no future potus makes the same fucked up moves as that obama. what an ignorant power hungry war monger slut the obama is. clearly, intelligent people know that obama doesn't care or value the military
 
I see now. You aren't actually standing by these words. You just post what you read or listen to.

You don't believe that Obama attacked seven countries. You only posted what others believe, like an idiot parrot.

You're a nasty little piece of shit, aren't you.

You obviously couldn't win an honest argument so you just build strawmen like your mirror image Botany Boy.

Obama attacked more than 7 countries and I don't care what they tell you to believe in the prole feed that you parrot.
 
You're a nasty little piece of shit, aren't you.

You obviously couldn't win an honest argument so you just build strawmen like your mirror image Botany Boy.

Obama attacked more than 7 countries and I don't care what they tell you to believe in the prole feed that you parrot.


the obama slaves are very hostile and violent. this is why Chicago has so many murders
 
You're a nasty little piece of shit, aren't you.

You obviously couldn't win an honest argument so you just build strawmen like your mirror image Botany Boy.

Obama attacked more than 7 countries and I don't care what they tell you to believe in the prole feed that you parrot.
Obama waged war with more than seven countries? Which ones won and which lost?
 
Good Info but it doesn't support your allegation. It would have been easier to just list, Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, Sudan, and the others.

The problem is that there has been a certain Orwellian linguistic re-definition of what a "war" is. This article provides a thoughtful analysis -- if you define "war" as one where the congress issues a formal declaration of war, the US has been at peace during your entire lifetime. If you define "war" as the US bombing and killing people in some other country, I believe that the "7 countries" figure is correct. However, if you count all the countries where SOCOM has US military personal carrying out little sneaky acts of violence, the figure is apparently a staggering 134 nations. And the OP is completely correct in his denunciation of Obama. Rather than trying to figure out what a "war" is, we could instead look at violations of international law, and Obama orders those on a more or less daily basis. He wasn't the first POTUS to make the US a rogue nation, but he has sort of perfected it.
 
The problem is that there has been a certain Orwellian linguistic re-definition of what a "war" is. This article provides a thoughtful analysis -- if you define "war" as one where the congress issues a formal declaration of war, the US has been at peace during your entire lifetime. If you define "war" as the US bombing and killing people in some other country, I believe that the "7 countries" figure is correct. However, if you count all the countries where SOCOM has US military personal carrying out little sneaky acts of violence, the figure is apparently a staggering 134 nations. And the OP is completely correct in his denunciation of Obama. Rather than trying to figure out what a "war" is, we could instead look at violations of international law, and Obama orders those on a more or less daily basis. He wasn't the first POTUS to make the US a rogue nation, but he has sort of perfected it.

I wasn't saying UG was wrong, only that his argument didn't support his allegation. As much as I like a lot of Obama, he is a criminal deluded by the perifidity of his predecessors and incapable of using his education to actually apply American root principles to his own actions. I voted for him twice, but only as the least evil.
 
The problem is that there has been a certain Orwellian linguistic re-definition of what a "war" is. This article provides a thoughtful analysis -- if you define "war" as one where the congress issues a formal declaration of war, the US has been at peace during your entire lifetime. If you define "war" as the US bombing and killing people in some other country, I believe that the "7 countries" figure is correct. However, if you count all the countries where SOCOM has US military personal carrying out little sneaky acts of violence, the figure is apparently a staggering 134 nations. And the OP is completely correct in his denunciation of Obama. Rather than trying to figure out what a "war" is, we could instead look at violations of international law, and Obama orders those on a more or less daily basis. He wasn't the first POTUS to make the US a rogue nation, but he has sort of perfected it.
Suppose we'll ever see ISIL taking the US to The Hague for prosecution?
 
Back
Top