Obama-linked activists have a ‘training manual’ for protesting Trump

[TalkRadio]

An Obama-tied activist group training tens of thousands of agitators to protest President Trump’s policies plans to hit Republican lawmakers supporting those policies even harder this week, when they return home for the congressional recess and hold town hall meetings and other functions.

Organizing for Action, a group founded by former President Barack Obama and featured prominently on his new post-presidency website, is distributing a training manual to anti-Trump activists that advises them to bully GOP lawmakers into backing off support for repealing ObamaCare, curbing immigration from high-risk Islamic nations and building a border wall.

In a new Facebook post, OFA calls on activists to mobilize against Republicans from now until Feb. 26, when “representatives are going to be in their home districts.”

Chicago socialist Saul Alinsky, known by the left as “the father of community organizing,” taught radicals to “rub raw the sores of discontent” and create the conditions for a “revolution.” He dedicated his book, “Rules for Radicals,” to “Lucifer.” Michelle Obama quoted from the book when she helped launch OFA in 2013.

Obama appears to be behind the anti-Trump protests. He praised recent demonstrations against Trump’s travel ban. And last year, after Trump’s upset victory, he personally rallied OFA troops to “protect” his legacy in a conference call. “Now is the time for some organizing,” he said. “So don’t mope” over the election results.

http://nypost.com/2017/02/18/obama-linked-activists-have-a-training-manual-for-protesting-trump/

 

[adrina]

Good.

Watch out for that community organizer - he's got a bigger contact list now.

 

[TalkRadio]

Good.

Watch out for that community organizer - he's got a bigger contact list now.

Thank you for confirming that Obama intends to actively interfere with Trump's presidency.

 

[adrina]

Thank you for confirming that Obama intends to actively interfere with Trump's presidency.

The loyal opposition, no?

 

[Rightguide]

This was the Democrat plan in 2014 and will be the plan in 2018:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHHzreDVYAA5tW_.jpg

 

[Hypoxia]

This was the Democrat plan in 2014 and will be the plan in 2018:

The Dums are being very much helped by Team Tromp's active elimination of civil rights, justice, protections, et cetera. DJT famously asked black voters (whilst addressing a mostly-white crowd) "What have you got to lose?" The answer is becoming clear.

 

[adrina]

The Dums are being very much helped by Team Tromp's active elimination of civil rights, justice, protections, et cetera. DJT famously asked black voters (whilst addressing a mostly-white crowd) "What have you got to lose?" The answer is becoming clear.

Nationwide voter "integrity" commission.

The Ohio voter rolls purge.

This is just the beginning. If republicans want to be seen as friends to the black communities, they might try to not actively disenfranchise them.

 

[Comshaw]

http://nypost.com/2017/02/18/obama-linked-activists-have-a-training-manual-for-protesting-trump/

And this is different from what the Tea Party did for 8 years? How? Because you disagree with one and support the other you can blind yourself to the fact that the far rabid right is more like the far rabid left then they are different. Zealots, no matter their political outlook are still Zealots.

This was the Democrat plan in 2014 and will be the plan in 2018:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHHzreDVYAA5tW_.jpg

And this is the best you can come up with? A meme for christ sake? No wonder I rarely try to engage in any kind of conversation with you or your ilk.




Comshaw

 

[TalkRadio]

And this is different from what the Tea Party did for 8 years? How? Because you disagree with one and support the other you can blind yourself to the fact that the far rabid right is more like the far rabid left then they are different. Zealots, no matter their political outlook are still Zealots.



And this is the best you can come up with? A meme for christ sake? No wonder I rarely try to engage in any kind of conversation with you or your ilk.




Comshaw

Is the Tea Party responsible for insurance premiums that are equal to or greater than a monthly mortgage payment and family deductibles that are equal to or greater than the cost of a used car?

 

[Hypoxia]

Is the Tea Party responsible for insurance premiums that are equal to or greater than a monthly mortgage payment and family deductibles that are equal to or greater than the cost of a used car?

Yeah, RomneyCare sucks, especially since Guppy congressional oath-breakers won't provide the financing they promised. Yeah, it's the bagheads' fault, since they threatened political death to any Gup who didn't try to torpedo RomneyCare. It was a Guppy program, but once they didn't own it, they couldn't allow it to live. Yet, it persists!

RomneyObamaCare enjoys greater popularity than Congress and POTUS combined. Bagheads' popularity? Somewhere around Congress'. Yeah, that low.

Pay attention. Governance requires compromise. Reactionary / alt.right media have for decades pushed the notion of dominance -- kill all liberal programs, make liberals extinct, yada yada. In that worldview, compromise is surrender -- ya can't deal with those liberal devils.

Unfortunately, the rightest agenda is hated by most USAnians; dominance don't come easy. Try the Maoist mantra: "Political power arises from the barrel of a gun." Ballots or bullets, folks. And torches, as in Charlottesville.

Bagheads, Trompistas, Guppies, Nazis, ain't interested in responsibility, only power -- without paying the price. Pathetic.

 

[TalkRadio]

Yeah, RomneyCare sucks, especially since Guppy congressional oath-breakers won't provide the financing they promised. Yeah, it's the bagheads' fault, since they threatened political death to any Gup who didn't try to torpedo RomneyCare. It was a Guppy program, but once they didn't own it, they couldn't allow it to live. Yet, it persists!

RomneyObamaCare enjoys greater popularity than Congress and POTUS combined. Bagheads' popularity? Somewhere around Congress'. Yeah, that low.

Pay attention. Governance requires compromise. Reactionary / alt.right media have for decades pushed the notion of dominance -- kill all liberal programs, make liberals extinct, yada yada. In that worldview, compromise is surrender -- ya can't deal with those liberal devils.

Unfortunately, the rightest agenda is hated by most USAnians; dominance don't come easy. Try the Maoist mantra: "Political power arises from the barrel of a gun." Ballots or bullets, folks. And torches, as in Charlottesville.

Bagheads, Trompistas, Guppies, Nazis, ain't interested in responsibility, only power -- without paying the price. Pathetic.

Obama must be pissed his signature legislation has become such an enormous political liability no one wants to own.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

*chuckle*

 

[jaF0]

Thank you for confirming that Obama intends to actively interfere with Trump's presidency.

An honorable act. Interfere with 'Rump to the point of his removal from Office in abject disgrace.