Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its Obama
So its OK!
Or how about the FBI wanting a backdoor into ALL software?
Ishmael
All you conservatives clearly have something to hide...
We lib'rals are not afraid of a little snooping because it makes us feel secure that conservatives are being watched and monitored for the threat of violence and revolution against the Glorious State and our Dear Leader!
:kbate:
But stay out of my bedroom, you fascist pig!
FISA court activities were a good idea under Bush though, right?
FISA court activities were a good idea under Bush though, right?
The order, signed by Judge Roger Vinson of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in April, directs a Verizon Communications subsidiary, Verizon Business Network Services, to turn over “on an ongoing daily basis” to the National Security Agency all call logs “between the United States and abroad” or “wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls.”
This comment was inevitable
The simple answer is this
Under Bush, most of the country BELIEVED that the calls listened to were TERROR related
Under Obama, we ALL KNOW, most of the calls are those that are ANTI OBAMA......TEA PARTY etc
Obama cant be trusted!
The libs truly believe that it is still terror related...
ALL TEA GUYS etc etc are TERRORISTS!
Truth is the left embraces this kind of totalitarianism, unless there's a Pub in office.
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's seizure of millions of phone Verizon phone records under a secret court order is "alarming" and "beyond Orwellian," an American Civil Liberties Union official said Wednesday.
The Guardian's Glenn Greenwald reported on a secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order that required Verizon to turn over information on all telephone calls both within the U.S. and between the U.S. and other countries on an "ongoing, daily basis" until July 19. The order was issued on April 25.
“From a civil liberties perspective, the program could hardly be any more alarming," Jameel Jaffer, the deputy legal director of the ACLU, said in a statement. "It’s a program in which some untold number of innocent people have been put under the constant surveillance of government agents. It is beyond Orwellian, and it provides further evidence of the extent to which basic democratic rights are being surrendered in secret to the demands of unaccountable intelligence agencies.”
Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) said in a statement he could not comment on the details in the Guardian's report, but reiterated that he felt Americans would be taken aback by the way courts have interpreted the government's spying powers.
"This sort of widescale surveillance should concern all of us and is the kind of government overreach I've said Americans would find shocking," Udall said. "As a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, it's why I will keep fighting for transparency and appropriate checks on the surveillance of Americans."
Michelle Richardson, legislative counsel at the ACLU Washington legislative office, called on the government to end the surveillance effort and to disclose its full scope.
“This disclosure also highlights the growing gap between the public’s and the government’s understandings of the many sweeping surveillance authorities enacted by Congress," Richardson said. "Since 9/11, the government has increasingly classified and concealed not just facts, but the law itself. Such extreme secrecy is inconsistent with our democratic values of open government and accountability.”
"The Patriot Act’s incredibly broad surveillance provision purportedly authorizes an order of this sort, though its constitutionality is in question and several senators have complained about it," the Center for Constitutional Rights said in a statement. "The Patriot Act provision requires the FBI to notify Congress about the number of such warrants, but this single order covering millions of people is a deceptive end-run around that disclosure requirement."
.
Gotta love John Ashcroft's Patriot Act, though, don't you?