Now Egypt; again

EternalFantasies

EqualOportunity"Offender"
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Posts
4,663
Two Churches hit on Palm Sunday. Dozens killed.


It's interesting the coinciding of egypt's president WH visit.

See, there's a theory here. Obama did not give the attacks replies? Seems to have deterred further offensives.

When retaliation is offered, then the beast will get excited and seek more attention for it's cause.

The paradox of this context is cruel.
 
Please repost in English.

I think EF means that ignoring terrorism discourages the terrorists and retaliating to it encourages them, since the latter means they're getting attention and being taken seriously.
 
Two Churches hit on Palm Sunday. Dozens killed.
It's interesting the coinciding of egypt's president WH visit.
See, there's a theory here. Obama did not give the attacks replies? Seems to have deterred further offensives.
When retaliation is offered, then the beast will get excited and seek more attention for it's cause.
The paradox of this context is cruel.

Was it coincidence that terrorist made an attack while the Egyptian VP was visiting the US? The Obama government virtually ignored radical Islamic attacks in Egypt. The lack of world attention may have contributed to a low number of attacks. Terror groups thrive on public attention.
 
I think EF means that ignoring terrorism discourages the terrorists and retaliating to it encourages them, since the latter means they're getting attention and being taken seriously.


I agree with you. Sometimes cats and dogs live in harmony.
 
Was it coincidence that terrorist made an attack while the Egyptian VP was visiting the US? The Obama government virtually ignored radical Islamic attacks in Egypt. The lack of world attention may have contributed to a low number of attacks. Terror groups thrive on public attention.

You need to do a little research on ISIS in the Sinai and the ongoing violence against the Copts that exploded when President Obama decided that Mubarek was a very bad man and he had to go...


The fact that they ordered an attack with no prior planning or intent, based upon a Holy Day, shows either a disrespect for their intelligence and determination or an ignorance founded in your distaste in who the American People chose as their leader.
 
So we should have ignored Pearl Harbor and the Japanese would have ceased and desisted?


People, please...
 
I mean, we've been ignoring the extermination of Christians in the region and the Jihaddi just keep attacking them and engaging in genocide...

:eek:

When we were lied to about the Christians murdering Muslims in Europe, Wesley Clark bombed the ever-loving shit out of the Christians.

So I asked you, which has worked?

Ignoring the slaughter of the Christians or the bombing that stopped the slaughter of Muslims and instead lead to their mainstreaming into nations like Sweden?
 
Last edited:
So we should have ignored Pearl Harbor and the Japanese would have ceased and desisted?


People, please...

OK that was a direct attack on the US. It should not be ignored. The middle east has been warring for centuries and not really our problem. I don't see how any of our interventions could solve the inherent problems.
 
OK that was a direct attack on the US. It should not be ignored. The middle east has been warring for centuries and not really our problem. I don't see how any of our interventions could solve the inherent problems.

And 9-11, Ambassador Steven and other actions, were only ancillary?

Maybe if we had engaged them when they were invading all of their neighbors???
 
And 9-11, Ambassador Steven and other actions, were only ancillary?

Maybe if we had engaged them when they were invading all of their neighbors???


Maybe if we quit meddling in the Middle East they wouldn't be pissied off at us. We needed the oil but times have changed. We don't really have stake over there anymore.

Again I ask has any US military intervention solved the problem. Also the wars have been going on before the US was even born.

War is a horrible thing but you see any end solution? Anything that could build a lasting peace to the region. I don't mean putting out fires. What could be done to create a lasting peace to the region?
 
Please repost in English.

Yeah, I agree...

:eek:

I didn't really 'get' any of that.


That is because your mindsets are geared toward reading things in one direction - or one point of view. And reading my usual right wing leaning, you expect that same point of view.

The others, extremists on their other side, had no issue with that one. Weird no? What r they smarter?

And i'm simply pointing to lines in between, in this case, yes, Rom's right, we have this guy's attention, let's get what we want.


What's amazing about both of you (sides), no one posted in the Pipeline Wars thread. yet, you are so keen on these little threads. Some get so affectionate towards people losing lives, kids getting gassed, etc. and come swearing and insulting.

Post them a thread worth reading and seeing what's behind much of this.

No. Not interested. :)


I'll be holding the :caning: at all corners.


Nothing but ignorance is ultimately gassing those kids. Way to set an example, hurt people.
 
You need to do a little research on ISIS in the Sinai and the ongoing violence against the Copts that exploded when President Obama decided that Mubarek was a very bad man and he had to go...


The fact that they ordered an attack with no prior planning or intent, based upon a Holy Day, shows either a disrespect for their intelligence and determination or an ignorance founded in your distaste in who the American People chose as their leader.

Get a grip, shit for brains. I was translating the Yank speak to plain English. Ya thick or summat?
 
Two Churches hit on Palm Sunday. Dozens killed.


It's interesting the coinciding of egypt's president WH visit.

See, there's a theory here. Obama did not give the attacks replies? Seems to have deterred further offensives.

When retaliation is offered, then the beast will get excited and seek more attention for it's cause.

The paradox of this context is cruel.

The intellectually impaired country man of yours thinks you need to do some extra reading.

You need to do a little research on ISIS in the Sinai and the ongoing violence against the Copts that exploded when President Obama decided that Mubarek was a very bad man and he had to go...


The fact that they ordered an attack with no prior planning or intent, based upon a Holy Day, shows either a disrespect for their intelligence and determination or an ignorance founded in your distaste in who the American People chose as their leader.
 
Get a grip, shit for brains. I was translating the Yank speak to plain English. Ya thick or summat?

No 4est is right. This is in response to your quote and statements. This was not in reply to your clarification of my OP post.
 
Maybe if we quit meddling in the Middle East they wouldn't be pissied off at us. We needed the oil but times have changed. We don't really have stake over there anymore.

Again I ask has any US military intervention solved the problem. Also the wars have been going on before the US was even born.

War is a horrible thing but you see any end solution? Anything that could build a lasting peace to the region. I don't mean putting out fires. What could be done to create a lasting peace to the region?

I see an end solution as many people here have been pointing out. Abandon our ally Israel and force them to nuke, murder and kill or accept a second genocide in less than the span of one century. But, as simple as that sounds, it would not stop the clash of cultures any more than the election of President Obama solved our own domestic culture clash...

And yes, some of our interventions did have positive effects, but because of our own internecine battle over the course of our culture and reemergence of the "its none of our business" mindset, we abandoned several Muslim allies and left them friendless in their own internecine battle for the heart of their culture.
 
That is because your mindsets are geared toward reading things in one direction - or one point of view. ...

That's fucking bullshit.

It's just incoherent, poorly written and perhaps not well thought out.

I was to the point of asking you if you had been drinking absinthe and as to your pipeline thread, it's not interesting and I didn't see it as any more consequential that say, the topic of what do we do about the Kurds creating a great tension in the same region in the name of not being occupied by traditional enemies...
 
Did you really use "internecine" twice in one sentence??? Really???


Injun, please!!!


I'm over the top offended this time. I bet that Laurel has Writing Police to answer my gripe.


And this shit has been going on over there for millennia, not mere centuries. If we let them wipe out Israel, they'll just go back to killing each other, as usual, about 20 minutes after the dust settles, when they get bored again. Insh'Allah!!!
 
That's fucking bullshit.

It's just incoherent, poorly written and perhaps not well thought out.

Oreo & Rom got it though; so while it may be unclear, it still made sense depending on who's reading.

I was to the point of asking you if you had been drinking absinthe and as to your pipeline thread, it's not interesting and I didn't see it as any more consequential that say, the topic of what do we do about the Kurds creating a great tension in the same region in the name of not being occupied by traditional enemies...

That thread, no one's touching. it is interesting. I posted proof that people in Syria want Assad to remain. in fact, it is only the continued fighting by ISIL and int'l pressure, that's making people in Syria start wondering, maybe if assad stepped down, they'd leave us alone. But, 'normal' majority people in Syria want assad to remain.

Also, the Syria ally, Hizbolla, which is Iran's ally too, has gone against their own interest, sent troops to go defend old Christian landmarks in Syria from being destroyed by ISIL like they did those in Iraq. And they defended Christian villages from slaughter.

No one here has been able to explain that. Not even you :)
 
I've stated repeatedly that Assad kept all of the religions safe and his country stable until the wrecking ball known as President Obama made his mark on the region. I don't need a story about a pipeline to make my point.


And being right-wing or left-wing doesn't alter the English language.
 
Back
Top