Not so current events

[OldJourno]

How many people here are aware that the creation of the "Russian dossier" was actually paid for by Hillary and the DNC?

How many people here are aware that then-FBI director James Comey knew the dossier information was bogus when he brought it to President Trump's attention the first time, but didn't reveal it?

Just wondering.

 

[mark_j]

So?

It didn't fit the narrative that was being pushed.

 

[Hypoxia]

This shit is really old. The dossier, more verified all the time, was originally financed by Gups opposed to Tromp. Try again with a different distraction.

 

[FeNomm]

How many people here are aware that the creation of the "Russian dossier" was actually paid for by Hillary and the DNC?

How many people here are aware that then-FBI director James Comey knew the dossier information was bogus when he brought it to President Trump's attention the first time, but didn't reveal it?

Just wondering.

nor did he share that info with Congress

and

used it to get FISA warrants

LOCK

HIM

UP

 

[nowisthetime]

Irrelevant shit.

At least W was incompetent but not inherently malicious.

Now, we have the RWJC defending someone who is both incompetent and EVIL.

But go ahead and stand by your old racist Fuhrer. You rightist folks mirror him.

 

[richard_daily]

Fake news.

 

[EternalFantasies]

How many people here are aware that the creation of the "Russian dossier" was actually paid for by Hillary and the DNC?

How many people here are aware that then-FBI director James Comey knew the dossier information was bogus when he brought it to President Trump's attention the first time, but didn't reveal it?

Just wondering.

It's all gonna come to a conclusion in trump's favor, right when trump's about to go to war.

Then, he'll be re-elected with even higher numbers.

 

[phrodeau]

At least the dossier wasn't compiled by The Onion, then passed off as genuine.

 

[Hypoxia]

At least the dossier wasn't compiled by The Wall Street Journal editorial staff, then passed off as genuine.

Fixed for ya.

 

[Liar]

It's all gonna come to a conclusion in trump's favor, right when trump's about to go to war.

Then, he'll be re-elected with even higher numbers.

Well, it would take some serious electoral contortionism to get re-eelected with lower numbers.

 

[WoundedKnee]

It's all gonna come to a conclusion in trump's favor, right when trump's about to go to war.

Then, he'll be re-elected with even higher numbers.

I told you before, there would be no war, that the Russians would sputter a bit for home consumption rattle some sabers and that would be about it. As I pointed out prior to the strike, they didn't even turn off their missile systems out of two fears, one that we might discover their actual capabilities and the second being that they might not work as advertised.

You said I was talking out of my ass, but neither you or Hypoxia got the war you wished for.

 

[EternalFantasies]

Well, it would take some serious electoral contortionism to get re-eelected with lower numbers.

Creative sidetracking there, but i'm glad we agree.

I told you before, there would be no war, that the Russians would sputter a bit for home consumption rattle some sabers and that would be about it. As I pointed out prior to the strike, they didn't even turn off their missile systems out of two fears, one that we might discover their actual capabilities and the second being that they might not work as advertised.

You said I was talking out of my ass, but neither you or Hypoxia got the war you wished for.

what on earth are you talking about?

1st, I don't recall ever us discussing the middle defense. Which, btw, worked very well.

Second, I'm not sure you made sense: you said they didn't turn them off for [/I]fear of them not working[/I]. ??

Third, I never said the war is here. I said, its a major possibility, and two, yes, I now am certain this was the first sign of what's to come.


This is why i like bumping thread where a discussion was happening, it's easier to keep a 'thread' (pun unintended - however appropriate) of conversation going for better understanding; let alone quoting.

There: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1474128&page=8

 

[JohnnySavage]

A private investigative firm, Fusion GPS, provided political opposition research against Trump in two distinct phases, with completely separate funders. Fusion GPS was first contracted by a conservative political website, The Washington Free Beacon, and Steele was not involved in that research. When Trump became the presumptive nominee on May 3, 2016, The Free Beacon stopped their backing. Separately, in April 2016, attorney Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Fusion GPS later subcontracted Steele to research and compile the dossier.[7] Following Trump's election as president, funding from Clinton and the DNC ceased, but Steele continued to work, and was reportedly paid directly by Glenn R. Simpson, a co-founder of Fusion GPS.[8] The completed dossier was then handed to British and American intelligence services.[9]

 

[zipman]

This shit is really old. The dossier, more verified all the time, was originally financed by Gups opposed to Tromp. Try again with a different distraction.

The right wing is all about repeating a lie long enough until they believe it.

That's Trump's entire communication strategy.

 

[Liar]

How many people here are aware that the creation of the "Russian dossier" was actually paid for by Hillary and the DNC?

Most, I'd gather. It's pretty common info that they took it over from Republicans after they failed to stop Trump, and financed it for a while until they too failed to stop Trump. But only a moron would think that's controversial. A candidate paying a consulting firm for oppo reserarch? Oh noes. Fetch the smelling salts.

How many people here are aware that then-FBI director James Comey knew the dossier information was bogus when he brought it to President Trump's attention the first time, but didn't reveal it?

Probably fewer, since that's not accurate.

Just wondering.

...or throwing out FUD.

 

[JaxsonPrice31]

It's hard to know what's going on now. People from both sides exaggerate issues so much now and you can't really rely on the news anymore to give you true information. I just don't know where things stand anymore.

 

[WoundedKnee]

It's hard to know what's going on now. People from both sides exaggerate issues so much now and you can't really rely on the news anymore to give you true information. I just don't know where things stand anymore.

On a foundation of sand.